Abstract
ABSTRACT
Background and Purpose
Robot‐assisted gait training (RAGT) is well established for post‐stroke gait rehabilitation, but its potential effects on psychological and behavioral outcomes are less clear. This study investigated the effects of adding RAGT to conventional rehabilitation on balance, gait, kinesiophobia, and movement confidence in individuals with post‐stroke hemiparesis.
Methods
This single‐blind, parallel‐group randomized controlled trial included 60 individuals with post‐stroke hemiparesis (50–75 years), randomly allocated to an RAGT group (
n
= 30) or control group (
n
= 30). Ethical approval was obtained from the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Istanbul Yeni Yüzyıl University (Approval No. 20.01.2022/05; approval date: 20 January 2022). Both groups received conventional rehabilitation for 8 weeks; the RAGT group additionally received 24 sessions of RAGT. Kinesiophobia was a prespecified study outcome assessed using the Kinesiophobia Causes Scale (KCS); balance, gait, and balance confidence were also assessed. All 60 randomized participants completed follow‐up and were analyzed in their assigned groups.
Results
Significant group × time interactions were observed for several outcomes, including BBS, TUG duration, 10MWT walking speed, ABC, and KCS total score (
p
p
Discussion
Adding RAGT to conventional rehabilitation was associated with greater improvements in several balance, mobility, walking‐speed, balance‐confidence, and kinesiophobia outcomes compared with conventional rehabilitation alone. These findings suggest potential additional physical and psychological benefits of incorporating RAGT into post‐stroke rehabilitation. However, because the RAGT group received greater overall treatment exposure, the observed between‐group differences cannot be attributed solely to the robotic component. The principal contribution of this study is the concurrent evaluation of kinesiophobia and movement confidence alongside physical outcomes.