Abstract
No public abstract is available from the verified source records.
Contact and support
Need help, have a question, or want to contact the ResearchHub team?
© 2026 ResearchHub. Built for responsible scholarly connection.
Privacy-aware community infrastructureE. J. E. de Bock, B. Stoelinga, F. I. Kandi, C. D. Fernandes, M. Mischi, W. Froyman, Dirk Timmerman, J. A. F. Huirne, L. J. M. Juffermans, N. B. Burger
Abstract
Authors
No local reference links have been materialized yet.
No local citing links have been materialized yet.
Increased angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis in adenomyosis visualized by multiplex immunohistochemistry
10.3390/ijms23158434 · 2022
Role of angiogenesis in adenomyosis‐associated abnormal uterine bleeding and subfertility: a systematic review
10.1093/humupd/dmz024 · 2019
Tumorigenesis and the angiogenic switch
10.1038/nrc1093 · 2003
Contrast‐enhanced ultrasound imaging of uterine disorders: a systematic review
10.1177/01617346211017462 · 2021
Therapeutic response assessment of high intensity focused ultrasound therapy for uterine fibroid: utility of contrast‐enhanced ultrasonography
10.1016/j.ejrad.2006.11.039 · 2007
Imaging manifestation of conventional and contrast‐enhanced ultrasonography in percutaneous microwave ablation for the treatment of uterine fibroids
10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.12.037 · 2012
Safety and efficacy of US‐guided high‐intensity focused ultrasound for treatment of submucosal fibroids
10.1007/s00330-012-2517-z · 2012
Predictive value of quantitative uterine fibroid perfusion parameters from contrast‐enhanced ultrasound for the therapeutic effect of high‐intensity focused ultrasound ablation
10.1002/jum.14838 · 2019
Contrast‐enhanced ultrasound is better than magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating the short‐term results of microwave ablation treatment of uterine fibroids
Institutions
No ROR-resolved institution is linked to this work yet.
Provenance
crossref
Confidence 100%
pubmed
Confidence 98%
unpaywall
Confidence 95%
datacite
Confidence 0%
2017
Contribution of contrast‐enhanced ultrasound with Sonovue to describe the microvascularization of uterine fibroid tumors before and after uterine artery embolization
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.07.030 · 2014
The diagnostic value of superb microvascular imaging in prediction of uterine artery embolization treatment response in uterine leiomyomas
10.1002/jum.15647 · 2021
Uterine contrast‐enhanced ultrasound (ceus): new insights into adenomyosis using an innovative technique
10.1016/j.wfumbo.2025.100095 · 2025
The EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations for the clinical practice of contrast‐enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in non‐hepatic applications: update 2017 (long version)
10.1055/a-0586-1107 · 2018
Ultrasound contrast agent modeling: a review
10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2020.04.014 · 2020
Contrast‐enhanced US of the liver and kidney: a problem‐solving modality
10.1148/radiol.211347 · 2022
Use of contrast‐enhanced ultrasound in the assessment of uterine fibroids: a feasibility study
10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2018.03.030 · 2018
Applying contrast‐enhanced ultrasound model to distinguish atypical focal adenomyosis from uterine leiomyomas
10.21037/atm-22-4460 · 2022
Surgical innovation and evaluation 3 no surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations
10.1016/s0140-6736(09)61116-8 · 2009
Terms, definitions and measurements to describe sonographic features of myometrium and uterine masses: a consensus opinion from the morphological uterus sonographic assessment (MUSA) group
10.1002/uog.14806 · 2015
Consensus on revised definitions of morphological uterus sonographic assessment (MUSA) features of adenomyosis: results of modified Delphi procedure
10.1002/uog.24786 · 2022
Simple ultrasound‐based rules for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer
10.1002/uog.5365 · 2008
An EFSUMB introduction into dynamic contrast‐enhanced ultrasound (DCE‐US) for quantification of tumour perfusion
10.1055/s-0032-1313026 · 2012
Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for contrast‐enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the liver‐update 2020 WFUMB in cooperation with EFSUMB, AFSUMB, AIUM, and FLAUS
10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2020.04.030 · 2020
The EFSUMB guidelines on the non‐hepatic clinical applications of contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS): a new dawn for the escalating use of this ubiquitous technique
10.1055/s-0031-1299141 · 2012
New insights into uteroplacental perfusion: quantitative analysis using Doppler and contrast‐enhanced ultrasound imaging
10.1016/j.placenta.2013.01.019 · 2013
Negrao de Figueiredo G, et al. SonoVue(R) does not appear to cross the placenta as observed during an examination aimed at confirming a diagnosis of liver echinococcosis in a pregnant woman
10.1055/a-0837-0791 · 2020
Safety of contrast‐enhanced ultrasound using microbubbles in human pregnancy: a scoping review
2024
How to perform contrast‐enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)
10.1055/s-0043-123931 · 2018
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Artifacts and pitfalls in contrast‐enhanced ultrasound of the liver
10.1055/s-0033-1355872 · 2014
Conditionally increased acoustic pressures in nonfetal diagnostic ultrasound examinations without contrast agents: a preliminary assessment
10.7863/ultra.34.7.15.13.0001 · 2015
Acoustic cavitation
10.1016/0370-1573(80)90115-5 · 1980
Ultrasound imaging with SonoVue: low mechanical index real‐time imaging
10.1016/s1076-6332(03)80204-0 · 2002
10.1088/978-0-7503-2552-3
10.1088/978-0-7503-2552-3 · 2021
Artifacts and technical considerations at contrast‐enhanced US
10.1148/rg.220093 · 2023
Contrast‐enhanced ultrasound for quantification of tissue perfusion in humans
10.1111/micc.12588 · 2020
Ultrasound localization microscopy and super‐resolution: a state of the art
10.1109/tuffc.2018.2850811 · doi-reference