Reply to the Letter to the Editor: Concordant breast-density measurement does not guarantee concordant risk classification—a downstream caveat for planning supplemental screening

Jim Peters; Daniëlle van der Waal; Carla H. van Gils; Mireille J. M. Broeders

doi:10.1007/s00330-026-12883-z

Enriched record

Reply to the Letter to the Editor: Concordant breast-density measurement does not guarantee concordant risk classification—a downstream caveat for planning supplemental screening

Jim Peters, Daniëlle van der Waal, Carla H. van Gils, Mireille J. M. Broeders

European Radiology2026doi:10.1007/s00330-026-12883-z

Citation graph

Abstract

No public abstract is available from the verified source records.

Authors

Jim Peters#1 Daniëlle van der Waal#2 Carla H. van Gils#3 Mireille J. M. Broeders#4

Institutions

Radboud University Nijmegen Radboud University Medical Center University Medical Center Utrecht Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences

Referenced works

View all references →

Letter to the Editor: Concordant breast-density measurement does not guarantee concordant risk classification—a downstream caveat for planning supplemental screening

2026 · 1 citations

Cited by

View all cited-by records →

No local citing links have been materialized yet.

External reference records

10.1007/s00330-026-12882-0

10.1007/s00330-022-08617-6

10.1007/s00330-022-08617-6 · 2022

10.1056/nejmoa1903986

10.1056/nejmoa1903986 · 2019

10.1016/j.ejca.2025.115220

10.1016/j.ejca.2025.115220 · 2025

10.1007/s00330-026-12593-6

10.1186/s13058-017-0859-9

10.1186/s13058-017-0859-9 · 2017

10.1016/0895-4356(93)90018-v

10.1016/0895-4356(93)90018-v · 1993

External cited-by records

10.1016/0895-4356(93)90018-v

10.1016/0895-4356(93)90018-v · doi-reference

10.1186/s13058-017-0859-9

10.1186/s13058-017-0859-9 · doi-reference

10.1007/s00330-026-12593-6

10.1007/s00330-026-12593-6 · doi-reference