Abstract
Purpose
To evaluate the effectiveness of various graft options for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using network meta‐analysis.
Methods
A medical literature search was conducted of PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, SCOPUS, and Web of Science from their inception through March 1, 2019. The outcomes, including International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) form, Lachman test, Lysholm score, Pivot shift test, and Tegner score, were evaluated among graft options. Data extraction was carried out according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, and a network meta‐analysis was performed using STATA 14.0.
Results
A total of 45 trials with 3992 patients were included. The forest plots revealed no significant differences in IKDC, Lysholm, or Tegner score among the grafts. In Lachman score, a significant difference was found in the comparisons of hamstring tendon allograft (HT‐AL) versus patellar tendon autograft (PT‐AU) and HT‐AL versus hamstring tendon autograft (HT‐AU). In pivot shift test, PT‐AU was superior to all the other grafts, and quadriceps tendon autograft (QT‐AU) was superior to HT‐AL and artificial ligament (Art‐L) in the number of cases with negative results. According to surface under the cumulative ranking area (SUCRA), PT‐AU had the highest probability to be the best intervention in Lachman test and Tegner score; tibialis anterior tendon allograft (TA‐AL) in IKDC and Lysholm score; and QT‐AU in pivot shift test. Based on the cluster analysis of SUCRA, PT‐AU was considered the most appropriate intervention by IKDC and Lachman test.
Conclusion
This study suggests that PT‐AU may be the most appropriate graft for ACL reconstruction according to IKDC and Lachman test results.
Level of Evidence
Level I, network meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials.