Abstract
Álvaro Pérez‐Gómez, Fernando Ojeda, Oscar Godoy
Abstract
Authors
Institutions
Provenance
crossref
Confidence 100%
openalex
Confidence 95%
datacite
Confidence 0%
No local reference links have been materialized yet.
No local citing links have been materialized yet.
Effects of afforestation with pines on woody plant diversity of Mediterranean heathlands in southern Spain
10.1023/a:1016850708890 · 2002
Nesting habitat of ground-nesting bees: a review
10.1111/een.12986 · 2021
Diversity and composition of fruit-feeding butterflies in tropical Eucalyptus plantations
10.1007/s10531-007-9240-0 · 2008
The global tree restoration potential
10.1126/science.aax0848 · 2019
A meta-analytical global comparison of aboveground biomass accumulation between tropical secondary forests and monoculture plantations
10.1016/j.foreco.2012.11.024 · 2013
Guidance for successful tree planting initiatives
10.1111/1365-2664.13725 · 2020
Moving biodiversity from an afterthought to a key outcome of forest restoration
10.1038/s44358-025-00032-1 · 2025
Does plantation forestry restore biodiversity or create green deserts? A synthesis of the effects of land-use transitions on plant species richness
10.1007/s10531-010-9936-4 · 2010
Plantation forests and biodiversity: oxymoron or opportunity?
10.1007/s10531-008-9380-x · 2008
Positive forestry: the effect of rubber tree plantations on fruit feeding butterfly assemblages in the Brazilian Atlantic forest
10.1016/j.foreco.2017.04.043 · 2017
Different-aged Pinus afforestation does not support typical Atlantic Forest fruit-feeding butterfly assemblages
10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120279 · 2022
Symbiotic bacteria and fungi proliferate in diapause and may enhance overwintering survival in a solitary bee
10.1093/ismejo/wrae089 · 2024
Regard and protect ground-nesting pollinators as part of soil biodiversity
2022
Evaluation of Nest-site selection of ground-nesting bees and wasps (Hymenoptera) using emergence traps
10.4039/tce.2019.3 · 2019
Plant species traits are the predominant control on litter decomposition rates within biomes worldwide
10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01219.x · 2008
Pollination partial recovery across monospecific plantations of a native tree (Inga vera, Leguminosae) in the Atlantic forest: lessons for restoration
10.1016/j.foreco.2018.06.023 · 2018
Ten golden rules for reforestation to optimize carbon sequestration, biodiversity recovery and livelihood benefits
10.1111/gcb.15498 · 2021
A global-scale expert assessment of drivers and risks associated with pollinator decline
10.1038/s41559-021-01534-9 · 2021
Trees for bees
10.1016/j.agee.2018.10.024 · 2019
Small clear-cuts in managed forests support trap-nesting bees, wasps and their parasitoids
10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120076 · 2022
Unresolved referenced work
2021
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Stand stage affects wild bee communities in working pine forests
10.1016/j.foreco.2023.121247 · 2023
What do we know about the effects of landscape changes on plant–pollinator interaction networks?
10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.07.025 · 2013
Functional traits and nesting habitats distinguish the structure of bee communities in clearcut and managed hardwood and pine forests in southeastern USA
10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119351 · 2021
The contribution of open spaces to the maintenance of hoverfly (Diptera, Syrphidae) biodiversity in Irish plantation forests
10.1016/j.foreco.2006.09.052 · 2006
Leaf litter traits of invasive species slow down decomposition compared to Spanish natives: a broad phylogenetic comparison
10.1007/s00442-009-1512-9 · 2010
Afforestation falls short as a biodiversity strategy
10.1126/science.abd3064 · 2020
Moving towards the ecological intensification of tree plantations
10.1016/j.tplants.2021.12.009 · 2022
Combined effects of global change pressures on animal-mediated pollination
10.1016/j.tree.2013.05.008 · 2013
Managing monarch butterfly overwintering groves: making room among the eucalyptus
2015
High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change
10.1126/science.1244693 · 2013
Honey bee foragers balance colony nutritional deficiencies
10.1007/s00265-016-2067-5 · 2016
Functional group diversity of bee pollinators increases crop yield
10.1098/rspb.2008.0405 · 2008
Tree planting is not a simple solution
10.1126/science.aba8232 · 2020
Agroforestry can enhance foraging and nesting resources for pollinators with focus on solitary bees at the landscape scale
10.1007/s10457-019-00400-9 · 2020
Unresolved referenced work
2006
Land-use changes as drivers of pollinator declines
10.7818/ecos.1378 · 2018
Understory plant diversity and phenolic allelochemicals across a range of Eucalyptus grandis plantation ages
10.1007/s11676-023-01606-5 · 2023
Fauna conservation in Australian plantation forests – a review
10.1016/j.biocon.2003.10.028 · 2004
Fantastic bees and where to find them: locating the cryptic overwintering queens of a western bumble bee
10.1002/ecs2.2949 · doi-reference
Spring understory herbs flower later in intensively managed forests
10.1002/eap.2332 · doi-reference
Land-use impacts on plant–pollinator networks: interaction strength and specialization predict pollinator declines
10.1890/13-0436.1 · doi-reference
A global meta-analysis of the impacts of tree plantations on biodiversity
10.1111/geb.13440 · doi-reference
Bee nutrition and floral resource restoration
10.1016/j.cois.2015.05.008 · doi-reference
The role of Eucalyptus planted forests for fruit-feeding butterflies’ conservation in fragmented areas of the Brazilian Atlantic forest
10.1016/j.foreco.2018.09.017 · doi-reference
Effects of Pinus pinea litter on seed germination and seedling performance of three Mediterranean shrub species
10.1007/s10725-011-9652-4 · doi-reference
Bees in the trees: diverse spring fauna in temperate forest edge canopies
10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118903 · doi-reference
The value of forests to pollinating insects varies with forest structure, composition, and age
10.1007/s40725-024-00224-6 · doi-reference
Forests are critically important to global pollinator diversity and enhance pollination in adjacent crops
10.1111/brv.12947 · doi-reference
Thinning of loblolly pine plantations in subtropical Argentina: impact on microclimate and understory vegetation
10.1016/j.foreco.2016.10.040 · doi-reference
Fragmentation of forest-steppe predicts functional community composition of wild bee and wasp communities
10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01988 · doi-reference
Phenology of farmland floral resources reveals seasonal gaps in nectar availability for bumblebees
10.1111/1365-2664.13403 · doi-reference
Responses of community structure, diversity, and abundance of understory plants and insect assemblages to thinning in plantations
10.1016/j.foreco.2009.11.019 · doi-reference
Succession of bee communities on fallows
10.1034/j.1600-0587.2001.240110.x · doi-reference
The effects of shade on the plant communities of rides in plantation woodland and implications for butterfly conservation
10.1016/0378-1127(95)03639-3 · doi-reference
Effects of afforestation on plant diversity and soil quality in semiarid SE Spain
10.3390/f12121730 · doi-reference
The winners and losers of land use intensification: pollinator community disassembly is non-random and alters functional diversity
10.1111/ddi.12221 · doi-reference
Urbanisation and agricultural intensification modulate plant–pollinator network structure and robustness
10.1111/1365-2435.14503 · doi-reference
Responses of insect pollinators and understory plants to silviculture in northern hardwood forests
10.1007/s10531-012-0272-8 · doi-reference
Afforestation and abandonment of semi-natural grasslands lead to biodiversity loss and a decline in ecosystem services and functions
10.1111/1365-2664.14375 · doi-reference
Linking bees and flowers: how do floral communities structure pollinator communities?
10.1890/02-0136 · doi-reference
Global pollinator declines: trends, impacts and drivers
10.1016/j.tree.2010.01.007 · doi-reference
Host and floral communities shape parasite prevalence and reproduction in intensively managed forests
10.1002/ecs2.4709 · doi-reference
Direct and indirect effects of land use on microbiomes of trap-nesting solitary bee larvae and nests
10.3389/fmicb.2024.1513096 · doi-reference
Poor communication jeopardizes biodiversity
10.1111/cobi.14181 · doi-reference
Beyond the forest-centric bias: rethinking extensive pine plantations in mediterranean landscapes
10.1016/j.tfp.2026.101301 · doi-reference
Canopy thinning, not agricultural history, determines early responses of wild bees to longleaf pine savanna restoration
10.1111/rec.13043 · doi-reference
Spatial heterogeneity regulates plant-pollinator networks across multiple landscape scales
10.1371/journal.pone.0123628 · doi-reference
Forests do not limit bumble bee foraging movements in a montane meadow complex
10.1111/een.12868 · doi-reference
Global effects of land-use intensity on local pollinator biodiversity
10.1038/s41467-021-23228-3 · doi-reference
A review of the energetics of pollination biology
10.1007/s00360-013-0760-5 · doi-reference
People plant trees for utility more often than for biodiversity or carbon
10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109224 · doi-reference
The impacts of bioenergy pine plantation management practices on bee communities
10.1111/1365-2664.13586 · doi-reference
Understory plant diversity and phenolic allelochemicals across a range of Eucalyptus grandis plantation ages
10.1007/s11676-023-01606-5 · doi-reference
Land-use changes as drivers of pollinator declines
10.7818/ecos.1378 · doi-reference
Agroforestry can enhance foraging and nesting resources for pollinators with focus on solitary bees at the landscape scale
10.1007/s10457-019-00400-9 · doi-reference
Tree planting is not a simple solution
10.1126/science.aba8232 · doi-reference
Functional group diversity of bee pollinators increases crop yield
10.1098/rspb.2008.0405 · doi-reference
Honey bee foragers balance colony nutritional deficiencies
10.1007/s00265-016-2067-5 · doi-reference