Abstract
Scarlett Desclaux, Narong Chitchongyingcharoen, Chanatat Threeratanah, Chavalwit Soonthronsuk, Sorawut Thamyongkit, Chagriya Kitiyakara, Natnaree Siriwon
Abstract
Authors
Institutions
No ROR-resolved institution is linked to this work yet.
Provenance
crossref
Confidence 100%
No local reference links have been materialized yet.
No local citing links have been materialized yet.
Bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cell treatment in patients with osteoarthritis results in overall improvement in pain and symptoms and reduces synovial inflammation
10.1002/sctm.18-0183 · 2019
Intramyocardial bone marrow stem cells in patients undergoing cardiac surgical revascularization
10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.07.093 · 2020
Current understanding of the immunosuppressive properties of mesenchymal stromal cells
10.1007/s00109-019-01776-y · 2019
Mesenchymal stromal cells and the innate immune response
10.1016/j.imlet.2015.05.004 · 2015
Current good manufacturing practice considerations for mesenchymal stromal cells as therapeutic agents
2021
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Quality by design to define critical process parameters for mesenchymal stem cell expansion
10.1016/j.biotechadv.2021.107765 · 2021
Validation of an automated cell counting method for cGMP manufacturing of human induced pluripotent stem cells
2022
Utility investigation of automated techniques in hematopoietic progenitor cell count and viability assessment in the Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) setting
europepmc
Confidence 96%
unpaywall
Confidence 95%
doaj
Confidence 92%
datacite
Confidence 0%
10.30714/j-ebr.2020463606 · 2020
Development of robust cell therapy manufacturing processes largely depends on the choice of cell counting method considering cell type, precision, and accuracy requirements
2022
Tips and tricks for validation of quality control analytical methods in good manufacturing practice mesenchymal stromal cell production
10.1155/2018/3038565 · 2018
Comparison of trypan blue dye exclusion and fluorometric assays for mammalian cell viability determinations
10.1021/bp00024a017 · 1993
Assessment and comparison of viability assays for cellular products
10.1016/j.jcyt.2023.11.008 · 2024
Unresolved referenced work
2009
Unresolved referenced work
2019
Quality control assays for clinical-grade Human mesenchymal stromal cells: methods for ATMP release
10.1007/978-1-4939-3584-0_19 · 2016
Validation of cell density and viability assays using Cedex automated cell counter
10.1016/j.biologicals.2010.01.009 · 2010
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Quality cell therapy manufacturing by design
10.1038/nbt.3525 · 2016
Cell cytometry: review and perspective on biotechnological advances
10.3389/fbioe.2019.00147 · 2019
Validation of three viable-cell counting methods: manual, semi-automated, and automated
10.1016/j.btre.2015.04.004 · 2015
NucleoCounter-an efficient technique for the determination of cell number and viability in animal cell culture processes
10.1007/s10616-006-9012-9 · 2006
Automated cell counting for Trypan blue-stained cell cultures using machine learning
10.1371/journal.pone.0291625 · 2023
U-net deep-learning-based 3D cell counter for the quality control of 3D cell-based assays through seed cell measurement
10.1177/24726303211017532 · 2021
Defining quality attributes to enable measurement assurance for cell therapy products
10.1016/j.jcyt.2016.07.002 · 2016
Unresolved referenced work
2020
Validation of an automated viable cell counting assay for GMP manufacturing of human induced pluripotent stem cells
10.1016/j.bej.2023.108953 · 2023
Effects of diluents on cell culture viability measured by automated cell counter
2017
Observation and quantification of the morphological effect of trypan blue rupturing dead or dying cells
10.1371/journal.pone.0227950 · 2020
Trypan blue exclusion test of cell viability
2015
No additional external references are available.