Abstract
Contact and support
Need help, have a question, or want to contact the ResearchHub team?
© 2026 ResearchHub. Built for responsible scholarly connection.
Yiyu Kang, Hyungwoong Ahn, Zhigang Hu
Abstract
Authors
Institutions
No ROR-resolved institution is linked to this work yet.
Provenance
crossref
Confidence 100%
unpaywall
Confidence 95%
doaj
Confidence 92%
datacite
Confidence 0%
No local reference links have been materialized yet.
No local citing links have been materialized yet.
New land-use-change emissions indicate a declining CO2 airborne fraction
10.1038/s41586-021-04376-4 · 2022
Carbon dioxide capture from open air using covalent organic frameworks
10.1038/s41586-024-08080-x · 2024
Feasible deployment of carbon capture and storage and the requirements of climate targets
10.1038/s41558-024-02104-0 · 2024
The open DAC 2023 dataset and challenges for Sorbent discovery in direct air capture
10.1021/acscentsci.3c01629 · 2024
Advanced porous framework materials for energy-efficient and technoeconomic-viable direct air capture
2025
The cost of CO2 capture and storage
10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.05.018 · 2015
Atomic/molecular layer deposition strategies for enhanced CO2 capture, utilisation and storage materials
10.1039/d3cs00759f · 2024
Near-cryogenic direct air capture using adsorbents
10.1039/d5ee01473e · 2025
Efficient capture and separation of CO2-boosted carbon neutralization enabled by tailorable metal-organic frameworks: a review
10.1002/ece2.15 · 2023
Ethylene purification by pressure swing adsorption with the paraffin selective metal–Organic Framework-DUT-8
10.1021/acs.iecr.3c02808 · 2024
CO2 capture from dry flue gas by vacuum swing adsorption: a pilot plant study
10.1002/aic.14435 · 2014
Comparison of activated carbon and Zeolite 13X for CO2 recovery from flue gas by pressure swing adsorption
10.1021/ie00041a020 · 1995
Temperature vacuum swing adsorption for post-combustion carbon capture with different process configurations
10.1016/j.energy.2025.137520 · 2025
Direct contact TSA cycle based on a hydrophobic MOF sorbent for post-combustion CO2 capture from wet flue gas
10.1016/j.ces.2024.120744 · 2025
A review on development of post-combustion CO2 capture technologies: performance of carbon-based, zeolites and MOFs adsorbents
10.1016/j.fuel.2024.132103 · 2024
System-level comparison and techno-economic evaluation of structured metal–organic framework adsorbents for post-combustion CO2 capture by vacuum/pressure swing adsorption
10.1016/j.cej.2025.159384 · 2025
Bio-engineering of carbon adsorbents to capture CO2 from industrial sources: the cement case
10.1016/j.seppur.2023.125407 · 2024
Evaluation of ammonia modified and conventionally activated biomass based carbons as CO2 adsorbents in postcombustion conditions
10.1016/j.seppur.2011.04.015 · 2011
Performance of TSA and VSA post-combustion CO2 capture processes with a biomass waste-based adsorbent
10.1016/j.jece.2022.108759 · 2022
Breakthrough adsorption study of a commercial activated carbon for pre-combustion CO2 capture
10.1016/j.cej.2011.04.027 · 2011
Simulation and optimization of a rotary temperature swing adsorption (RTSA) process for CO2 capture
10.1021/acs.iecr.4c04957 · 2025
Photoluminescent metal-organic frameworks and their composites: fundamentals, applications, and outlooks
10.1016/j.ccr.2024.216358 · 2025
Advanced porous MOF materials and technologies for high-efficiency ppm-level toxic gas separation
10.1016/j.mser.2024.100874 · 2024
The chemistry and applications of hafnium and cerium(iv) metal–organic frameworks
10.1039/d0cs00920b · 2021
Ionic liquids functionalized MOFs for adsorption
10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00248 · 2023
Water-enhanced direct air capture of carbon dioxide in metal–Organic frameworks
10.1021/jacs.3c14125 · 2024
Application of MOF-808 and its derivatives in carbon capture and CO2 catalytic conversion
10.1039/d5ta00011d · 2025
Enhanced CO2 capture potential of UiO-66-NH2 synthesized by sonochemical method: experimental findings and performance evaluation
10.1038/s41598-023-47221-6 · 2023
Effect of functional groups on low-concentration carbon dioxide capture in UiO-66-type metal–Organic frameworks
10.1021/acs.inorgchem.3c00821 · 2023
Ionized Zr-MOFs for highly efficient post-combustion CO2 capture
10.1016/j.ces.2014.09.032 · 2015
Improved structure of Zr-BTC metal organic framework using NH2 to enhance CO2 adsorption performance
10.1038/s41598-023-44076-9 · 2023
Efficient separation of carbon dioxide and methane in high-pressure and wet gas mixtures using Zr-MOF-808
10.1016/j.seppur.2024.129033 · 2025
Metal–organic frameworks for carbon dioxide capture
10.1557/mre.2020.30 · 2020
Using 13X, LiX, and LiPdAgX zeolites for CO2 capture from post-combustion flue gas
10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.01.031 · 2017
Fluorinated metal-organic framework aerogels with enhanced moisture resistance and efficient gas diffusion for CO2 capture
10.1016/j.cej.2024.155177 · 2024
Hierarchical fibrous metal–Organic framework/ionic liquid membranes for efficient CO2/N2 separation
10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c05232 · 2025
The pilot dual-reflux vacuum pressure swing adsorption unit for CO2 capture from flue gas
10.1016/j.seppur.2018.07.079 · 2019
Design and experiment of high-productivity two-stage vacuum pressure swing adsorption process for carbon capturing from dry flue gas
10.1016/j.cjche.2021.02.022 · 2022
A numerical comparison of heavy-purge and dual-reflux strategies in pressure swing adsorption for methane enrichment
10.1002/aic.18573 · 2025
Two-stage VSA/PSA for capturing carbon dioxide (CO2) and producing hydrogen (H2) from steam-methane reforming gas
10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.06.264 · 2020
CO2 capture by vacuum pressure swing adsorption from dry flue gas with a structured composite adsorption medium
10.1016/j.jece.2021.106037 · doi-reference
Multiobjective optimization of a four-step adsorption process for postcombustion CO2 capture via finite volume simulation
10.1021/ie302658y · doi-reference
Made-to-order metal-organic frameworks for trace carbon dioxide removal and air capture
10.1038/ncomms5228 · doi-reference
Metal−organic frameworks as adsorbents for hydrogen purification and precombustion carbon dioxide capture
10.1021/ja111411q · doi-reference
Amine modification of binder-containing zeolite 4A bodies for post-combustion CO2 capture
10.1021/acs.iecr.8b03958 · doi-reference
CO2 capture from dry flue gas by means of VPSA, TSA and TVSA
10.1016/j.jcou.2019.09.012 · doi-reference
CO2 Capture from flue gas in an existing coal-fired power plant by two successive pilot-scale VPSA units
10.1021/ie4009716 · doi-reference
Metal–Organic frameworks with precisely designed interior for carbon dioxide capture in the presence of water
10.1021/ja503296c · doi-reference
Low viscous aminoalkyl-phenyl-silane with π–π interaction and its optimal SO capture condition
10.1002/aic.17775 · doi-reference
Critical review on mobile direct air capture: concept expansion, characteristic description, and performance evaluation
10.1016/j.matt.2024.01.003 · doi-reference
Synthesis of hierarchical porous zeolite-Y for enhanced CO2 capture
10.1016/j.micromeso.2020.110261 · doi-reference
SSZ-45: a high-silica zeolite with small pore openings, large cavities, and unusual adsorption properties
10.1021/cm501176j · doi-reference
Post-combustion CO2 capture using solid sorbents: a review
10.1021/ie200686q · doi-reference
Adsorbent screening for postcombustion CO2 capture: a method relating equilibrium isotherm characteristics to an optimum vacuum swing adsorption process performance
10.1021/acs.iecr.5b04531 · doi-reference
Tuning the adsorption properties of UiO-66 via Ligand functionalization
10.1021/la3035352 · doi-reference
Pore engineering of metal–organic frameworks for boosting low-pressure CO2 capture
10.1039/d3ta05413f · doi-reference
High-temperature carbon dioxide capture in a porous material with terminal zinc hydride sites
10.1126/science.adk5697 · doi-reference
Polyethylenimine-modified Zeolite 13X for CO2 capture: adsorption and Kinetic studies
10.1021/acsomega.9b02047 · doi-reference
Understanding the modifications and applications of highly stable porous frameworks via UiO-66
10.1016/j.mtchem.2018.12.004 · doi-reference
De facto methodologies toward the synthesis and scale-up production of UiO-66-type metal–organic frameworks and membrane materials
10.1039/c5dt03359d · doi-reference
Reporting physisorption data for gas/solid systems with special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity (Recommendations 1984)
10.1351/pac198557040603 · doi-reference
Preparation of metal–Organic Frameworks UiO-66 for adsorptive removal of methotrexate from aqueous solution
10.1007/s10904-017-0709-3 · doi-reference
Ultra-tuning of the rare-earth fcu-MOF aperture size for selective molecular exclusion of branched paraffins
10.1002/anie.201506345 · doi-reference
Process swing adsorption with selective purge gas recirculation (PSA-SPUR): adsorption process technology optimised for separation of heavy component from a gas mixture and its design for CO2 capture through Equilibrium Theory analysis
10.1016/j.seppur.2024.130356 · doi-reference
A highly stable metal-organic framework with optimum aperture size for CO2 capture
10.1002/aic.15837 · doi-reference
Engineering CeO2 configurations to regulate the CuOx dispersion and switch pathways of preferential CO oxidation
10.1016/j.apcatb.2023.122686 · doi-reference
Reusable oxidation catalysis using metal-monocatecholato species in a robust metal–Organic framework
10.1021/ja411627z · doi-reference
Thermodynamics of mixed-gas adsorption
10.1002/aic.690110125 · doi-reference
Efficient adsorption of acetylene over CO2 in bioinspired covalent organic frameworks
10.1021/jacs.2c05309 · doi-reference
Effects of functionalization, catenation, and variation of the metal oxide and organic linking units on the low-pressure hydrogen adsorption properties of metal−organic frameworks
10.1021/ja056639q · doi-reference
Modulated synthesis of hcp MOFs for preferential CO2 capture
10.1039/d4cc01985g · doi-reference
Feasibility study of vacuum pressure swing adsorption for CO2 capture from an SMR hydrogen plant: comparison between synthesis gas capture and tail gas capture
10.3389/fceng.2021.742963 · doi-reference