Abstract
Ma'mon M. Hatmal, Omar Abuyaman, Mutasem Taha
Abstract
Authors
Institutions
No ROR-resolved institution is linked to this work yet.
Provenance
crossref
Confidence 100%
pubmed
Confidence 98%
europepmc
Confidence 96%
unpaywall
Confidence 95%
doaj
Confidence 92%
datacite
Confidence 0%
No local citing links have been materialized yet.
10.1093/bib/bbp023
10.1093/bib/bbp023
Binding Affinity via Docking: Fact and Fiction
10.3390/molecules23081899 · 2018
10.1021/ar800236t
10.1021/ar800236t
10.3390/ijms20184331
10.3390/ijms20184331
Task-Specific Scoring Functions for Predicting Ligand Binding Poses and Affinity and for Screening Enrichment
10.1021/acs.jcim.7b00309 · 2017
10.1039/d0ob02273j
10.1039/d0ob02273j
10.1021/jm001044l
10.1021/jm001044l
High-Throughput Docking Using Quantum Mechanical Scoring
10.3389/fchem.2020.00246 · 2020
Virtual Screening with AutoDock: Theory and Practice
10.1517/17460441.2010.484460 · 2010
10.1023/a:1007996124545
10.1023/a:1007996124545
10.1023/a:1011115820450
10.1023/a:1011115820450
Reduced Dimensionality in Ligand—Protein Structure Prediction: Covalent Inhibitors of Serine Proteases and Design of Site-Directed Combinatorial Libraries
10.1021/bk-1999-0719.ch019 · 1999
10.1006/jmbi.1999.3371
10.1006/jmbi.1999.3371
10.1021/jm030644s
10.1021/jm030644s
10.1007/bf00124474
10.1007/bf00124474
LigScore: a novel scoring function for predicting binding affinities
10.1016/j.jmgm.2004.11.007 · 2005
10.1007/s10822-020-00329-7
10.1007/s10822-020-00329-7
An Overview of Scoring Functions Used for Protein-Ligand Interactions in Molecular Docking
2019
Prediction of ligand binding mode among multiple cross-docking poses by molecular dynamics simulations
10.1007/s10822-020-00340-y · 2020
10.1007/s10822-010-9363-3
10.1007/s10822-010-9363-3
10.1007/0-306-46883-2_7
10.1007/0-306-46883-2_7
Effect of ligand volume correction on PMF scoring
10.1002/1096-987x(200103)22:4<418::aid-jcc1012>3.0.co;2-3 · 2001
PMF Scoring Revisited
10.1021/jm050038s · 2006
10.1021/jm980536j
10.1021/jm980536j
Protein-ligand Docking: A Review of Recent Advances and Future Perspectives
10.2174/157341208783497597 · 2008
Validation Studies of the Site-Directed Docking Program LibDock
10.1021/ci6004299 · 2007
10.1006/jmbi.1996.0477
10.1006/jmbi.1996.0477
10.2142/biophysico.13.0_181
10.2142/biophysico.13.0_181
Advances in Docking
10.2174/0929867325666180904115000 · 2020
SCORE: A New Empirical Method for Estimating the Binding Affinity of a Protein-Ligand Complex
10.1007/s008940050096 · 1998
10.1023/a:1007999920146
10.1023/a:1007999920146
Ranking poses in structure-based lead discovery and optimization: current trends in scoring function development
2007
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Prediction of Protein−Ligand Interactions. Docking and Scoring: Successes and Gaps
10.1021/jm060999m · 2006
Impact of Scoring Functions on Enrichment in Docking-Based Virtual Screening: An Application Study on Renin Inhibitors†
10.1021/ci0342728 · 2004
10.1016/j.drudis.2006.05.012
10.1016/j.drudis.2006.05.012
10.1002/jcc.21303
10.1002/jcc.21303
Docking-Based Comparative Intermolecular Contacts Analysis as New 3-D QSAR Concept for Validating Docking Studies and in Silico Screening: NMT and GP Inhibitors as Case Studies
10.1021/ci100368t · 2011
Combining docking-based comparative intermolecular contacts analysis and k-nearest neighbor correlation for the discovery of new check point kinase 1 inhibitors
10.1007/s10822-015-9848-1 · 2015
The use of docking-based comparative intermolecular contacts analysis to identify optimal docking conditions within glucokinase and to discover of new GK activators
10.1007/s10822-014-9740-4 · 2014
10.1007/s12551-016-0247-1
10.1007/s12551-016-0247-1 · doi-reference
Effects of Variable Docking Conditions and Scoring Functions on Corresponding Protein-Aligned Comparative Molecular Field Analysis Models Constructed from Diverse Human Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase 1B Inhibitors
10.1021/jm058047o · doi-reference
Validation of Molecular Docking Programs for Virtual Screening against Dihydropteroate Synthase
10.1021/ci800293n · doi-reference
Applicability Domain: A Step Toward Confident Predictions and Decidability for QSAR Modeling
10.1007/978-1-4939-7899-1_6 · doi-reference
SCRAMBLE 'N' GAMBLE: a tool for fast and facile generation of random data for statistical evaluation of QSAR models
10.1007/s11696-017-0215-7 · doi-reference
4D- quantitative structure–activity relationship modeling: making a comeback
10.1080/17460441.2019.1664467 · doi-reference
10.1016/j.cbi.2019.06.028
10.1016/j.cbi.2019.06.028 · doi-reference
10.2307/2529310
10.2307/2529310 · doi-reference
10.1021/ci500118s
10.1021/ci500118s · doi-reference
10.1007/s11222-016-9696-4
10.1007/s11222-016-9696-4 · doi-reference
Applications of machine learning techniques to predict filariasis using socio-economic factors
10.1017/s0950268819001481 · doi-reference
Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic
10.11613/bm.2012.031 · doi-reference
Pharmacophore features for machine learning in pharmaceutical virtual screening
10.1007/s11030-019-09961-4 · doi-reference
Evaluation of the performance of 3D virtual screening protocols: RMSD comparisons, enrichment assessments, and decoy selection–what can we learn from earlier mistakes?
10.1007/s10822-007-9163-6 · doi-reference
10.1021/jm049092j
10.1021/jm049092j · doi-reference
Development of novel in silico prediction model for drug-induced ototoxicity by using naive Bayes classifier approach
10.1016/j.tiv.2020.104812 · doi-reference
10.1016/j.compbiomed.2009.11.014
10.1016/j.compbiomed.2009.11.014 · doi-reference
Probabilistic neural network for evaluating seismic liquefaction potential
10.1139/t01-073 · doi-reference
Bioactive Molecule Prediction Using Extreme Gradient Boosting
10.3390/molecules21080983 · doi-reference
10.1038/s41598-017-09654-8
10.1038/s41598-017-09654-8 · doi-reference
10.1093/bioinformatics/btz828
10.1093/bioinformatics/btz828 · doi-reference
10.1093/nar/gkw1132
10.1093/nar/gkw1132 · doi-reference
10.1016/j.drudis.2006.03.009
10.1016/j.drudis.2006.03.009 · doi-reference
10.1016/s1093-3263(01)00125-5
10.1016/s1093-3263(01)00125-5 · doi-reference
Detailed analysis of grid-based molecular docking: A case study of CDOCKER-A CHARMm-based MD docking algorithm
10.1002/jcc.10306 · doi-reference
LigandFit: a novel method for the shape-directed rapid docking of ligands to protein active sites
10.1016/s1093-3263(02)00164-x · doi-reference
10.1002/1097-0134(20010501)43:23.0.co;2-t
10.1002/1097-0134(20010501)43:2<113::aid-prot1023>3.0.co;2-t · doi-reference
Structure validation by Cα geometry: ϕ, ψ and Cβ deviation
10.1002/prot.10286 · doi-reference
10.1002/pro.3330
10.1002/pro.3330 · doi-reference
10.1002/elps.200900140
10.1002/elps.200900140 · doi-reference
10.1093/nar/gky427
10.1093/nar/gky427 · doi-reference
10.1038/nmeth.1818
10.1038/nmeth.1818 · doi-reference
Crystal Structure of Serine protease Hepsin in complex with Inhibitor
10.2210/pdb5ce1/pdb · doi-reference
The Kinetic and Structural Characterization of the Reaction of Nafamostat with Bovine Pancreatic Trypsin
10.1016/s0049-3848(00)00206-1 · doi-reference
Molecular mechanism of inhibiting the SARS-CoV-2 cell entry facilitator TMPRSS2 with camostat and nafamostat
10.1039/d0sc05064d · doi-reference
10.1016/s0969-2126(03)00148-5
10.1016/s0969-2126(03)00148-5 · doi-reference
Synthesis and structure-activity relationships of small-molecular di-basic esters, amides and carbamates as flaviviral protease inhibitors
10.1016/j.ejmech.2019.05.025 · doi-reference
Active site conformational changes of prostasin provide a new mechanism of protease regulation by divalent cations
10.1002/pro.118 · doi-reference
10.1021/ja5112964
10.1021/ja5112964 · doi-reference
A new general synthesis of functionally substituted pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidines
10.1016/j.mencom.2019.07.025 · doi-reference