Abstract
Tin M. Tunjic, Noah Weber, Michael Brunsteiner
Abstract
Authors
Institutions
No ROR-resolved institution is linked to this work yet.
Provenance
crossref
Confidence 100%
pubmed
Confidence 98%
europepmc
Confidence 96%
unpaywall
Confidence 95%
doaj
Confidence 92%
datacite
Confidence 0%
No local reference links have been materialized yet.
No local citing links have been materialized yet.
10.1073/pnas.141230798
10.1073/pnas.141230798
10.1038/s41573-021-00371-6
10.1038/s41573-021-00371-6
PROTAC technology: opportunities and challenges
10.1021/acsmedchemlett.9b00597 · 2020
Current strategies for the design of PROTAC linkers: a critical review
10.37349/etat.2020.00018 · 2020
10.1021/acsptsci.1c00118
10.1021/acsptsci.1c00118
10.1038/s41586-019-0917-9
10.1038/s41586-019-0917-9
10.1021/acscentsci.7b00512
10.1021/acscentsci.7b00512
10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00537
10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00537
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
PROTAC-DB 2.0: an updated database of PROTACs
2022
10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00839
10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00839
10.1021/acs.jcim.9b01120
10.1021/acs.jcim.9b01120
Unresolved referenced work
2020
10.1038/s42256-022-00527-y
10.1038/s42256-022-00527-y
10.26434/chemrxiv-2022-qkx9f
10.26434/chemrxiv-2022-qkx9f
10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00915
10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00915
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
10.1021/acs.jcim.2c00838
10.1021/acs.jcim.2c00838
10.26434/chemrxiv.12843137.v1
10.26434/chemrxiv.12843137.v1
10.1016/s0169-409x(00)00129-0
10.1016/s0169-409x(00)00129-0
How beyond rule of 5 drugs and clinical candidates bind to their targets
2016
10.1016/j.chembiol.2014.08.013
10.1016/j.chembiol.2014.08.013
10.1021/acs.jmedchem.8b01732
10.1021/acs.jmedchem.8b01732
Computational prediction of formulation strategies for beyond-rule-of-5 compounds
10.1016/j.addr.2016.02.005 · 2016
10.1016/j.drudis.2020.03.012
10.1016/j.drudis.2020.03.012
Optimising proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs) for oral drug delivery: a drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics perspective
10.1016/j.drudis.2020.07.013 · 2020
Designing soluble PROTACs: strategies and preliminary guidelines
10.1021/acs.jmedchem.2c00201 · 2022
Impact of dynamically exposed polarity on permeability and solubility of chameleonic drugs beyond the rule of 5
10.1021/acs.jmedchem.8b00347 · 2018
Poorly soluble marketed drugs display solvation limited solubility
10.1021/jm0706416 · 2007
Hybrid alchemical free energy/machine-learning methodology for the computation of hydration free energies
10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00600 · 2020
How big is too big for cell permeability?
10.1021/acs.jmedchem.7b00237 · 2017
10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b01483
10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b01483
Predicting the permeability of macrocycles from conformational sampling – limitations of molecular flexibility
10.1016/j.xphs.2020.10.052 · 2021
Linker-dependent folding rationalizes PROTAC cell permeability
10.1021/acs.jmedchem.2c00877 · 2022
10.26434/chemrxiv-2022-jmx90
10.26434/chemrxiv-2022-jmx90
10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00280
10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00280
Fast estimation of the blood–brain barrier permeability by pulling a ligand through a lipid membrane
10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00834 · 2020
10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00872
10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00872
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
ProsetTac: rosetta based modeling of PROTAC mediated ternary complexes
10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00589 · 2020
10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00897
10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00897 · doi-reference
10.1016/j.sbi.2020.10.009
10.1016/j.sbi.2020.10.009 · doi-reference
10.1016/j.jbc.2022.101653
10.1016/j.jbc.2022.101653 · doi-reference
DeepPROTACs is a deep learning-based targeted degradation predictor for PROTACs
10.1038/s41467-022-34807-3 · doi-reference
Protein–protein interaction-gaussian accelerated molecular dynamics (PPI-GaMD): characterization of protein binding thermodynamics and kinetics
10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00974 · doi-reference
Quantifying protein–protein interactions in molecular simulations
10.1021/acs.jpcb.9b11802 · doi-reference
10.1038/nchem.2785
10.1038/nchem.2785 · doi-reference
Protein-peptide association kinetics beyond the seconds timescale from atomistic simulations
10.1038/s41467-017-01163-6 · doi-reference
Simulation of reversible protein–protein binding and calculation of binding free energies using perturbed distance restraints
10.1021/acs.jctc.7b00706 · doi-reference
10.1073/pnas.1815431116
10.1073/pnas.1815431116 · doi-reference
Computing protein-protein association affinity with hybrid steered molecular dynamics
10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00340 · doi-reference
Computational prediction of protein–protein binding affinities
10.1002/wcms.1448 · doi-reference
Native or non-native protein-protein docking models? Molecular dynamics to the rescue
10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00336 · doi-reference
10.1038/nprot.2016.169
10.1038/nprot.2016.169 · doi-reference
10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c02155
10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c02155 · doi-reference
GroScore: accurate scoring of protein–protein binding poses using explicit-solvent free-energy calculations
10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00687 · doi-reference
Improved modeling of peptide-protein binding through global docking and accelerated molecular dynamics simulations
10.3389/fmolb.2019.00112 · doi-reference
10.1021/ja026939x
10.1021/ja026939x · doi-reference
Enhanced molecular dynamics method to efficiently increase the discrimination capability of computational protein–protein docking
10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00789 · doi-reference
Efficient refinement and free energy scoring of predicted protein–protein complexes using replica exchange with repulsive scaling
10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00853 · doi-reference
Prediction of protein–protein complexes using replica exchange with repulsive scaling
10.1002/jcc.26187 · doi-reference
Evaluation of predicted protein-protein complexes by binding free energy simulations
10.1021/acs.jctc.8b01022 · doi-reference
Refining evERdock: improved selection of good protein-protein complex models achieved by MD optimization and use of multiple conformations
10.1063/1.5055799 · doi-reference
10.1529/biophysj.108.131383
10.1529/biophysj.108.131383 · doi-reference
CLUB-MARTINI: selecting favourable interactions amongst available candidates, a coarse-grained simulation approach to scoring docking decoys
10.1371/journal.pone.0155251 · doi-reference
Inclusion of desolvation energy into protein–protein docking through atomic contact potentials
10.1021/acs.jcim.1c01483 · doi-reference
10.4155/fmc-2017-0261
10.4155/fmc-2017-0261 · doi-reference
10.1101/2022.06.03.494737
10.1101/2022.06.03.494737 · doi-reference
10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c01576
10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c01576 · doi-reference
Shape change in crystallization of biological macromolecules
10.1557/mrs.2016.87 · doi-reference
Assessment of ab initio models of protein complexes by molecular dynamics
10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006182 · doi-reference