Abstract
Contact and support
Need help, have a question, or want to contact the ResearchHub team?
© 2026 ResearchHub. Built for responsible scholarly connection.
Yiqian Zhang, Jonathan Haines
Abstract
Authors
Institutions
No ROR-resolved institution is linked to this work yet.
Provenance
crossref
Confidence 100%
pubmed
Confidence 98%
europepmc
Confidence 96%
unpaywall
Confidence 95%
doaj
Confidence 92%
datacite
Confidence 0%
No local reference links have been materialized yet.
No local citing links have been materialized yet.
10.3390/nu14122426
10.3390/nu14122426
The human microbiome and its impacts on health
2020
10.1038/nrrheum.2011.121
10.1038/nrrheum.2011.121
Why our microbiome is important to our physiology and diseases
2017
Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome
10.1038/nature11234 · 2012
Microbiome research is becoming the key to better understanding health and nutrition
10.3389/fgene.2018.00212 · 2018
10.1042/bcj20160510
10.1042/bcj20160510
Gut microbiota-dependent trimethylamine n-oxide (tmao) pathway contributes to both development of renal insufficiency and mortality risk in chronic kidney disease
10.1161/circresaha.116.305360 · 2015
10.1016/j.cell.2019.07.008
10.1016/j.cell.2019.07.008
Compositional analysis: a valid approach to analyze microbiome high-throughput sequencing data
10.1139/cjm-2015-0821 · 2016
10.1038/nature08821
10.1038/nature08821
Estimating coverage in metagenomic data sets and why it matters
10.1038/ismej.2014.76 · 2014
Normalization and microbial differential abundance strategies depend upon data characteristics
10.1186/s40168-017-0237-y · 2017
10.1038/nmeth.2658
10.1038/nmeth.2658
Perfect: permutation filtering test for microbiome data
10.1093/biostatistics/kxy020 · 2019
10.1016/j.csbj.2020.09.014
10.1016/j.csbj.2020.09.014
It's all relative: analyzing microbiome data as compositions
10.1016/j.annepidem.2016.03.003 · 2016
Microbiome datasets are compositional: and this is not optional
10.3389/fmicb.2017.02224 · 2017
Comparison of the effectiveness of different normalization methods for metagenomic cross-study phenotype prediction under heterogeneity
10.1038/s41598-024-57670-2 · 2024
Evaluation of statistical methods for normalization and differential expression in mrna-seq experiments
2010
To transform or not to transform: that is the dilemma in the statistical analysis of plant volatiles
10.4161/psb.6.1.14191 · 2011
The statistical analysis of compositional data
10.1111/j.2517-6161.1982.tb01195.x · 1982
Compositional data and their analysis: an introduction
10.1144/gsl.sp.2006.264.01.01 · 2006
Analysis of compositions of microbiomes with bias correction
10.1038/s41467-020-17041-7 · 2020
Microbiome differential abundance methods produce different results across 38 datasets
10.1038/s41467-022-28034-z · 2022
A comprehensive evaluation of microbial differential abundance analysis methods: current status and potential solutions
10.1186/s40168-022-01320-0 · 2022
Analysis of microbial compositions: a review of normalization and differential abundance analysis
10.1038/s41522-020-00160-w · 2020
10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8
10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8
edger: a bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data
10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616 · 2010
Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation
2011
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Unifying the analysis of high-throughput sequencing datasets: characterizing rna-seq, 16s rrna gene sequencing and selective growth experiments by compositional data analysis
2014
Analysis of composition of microbiomes: a novel method for studying microbial composition
2015
A phylogenetic transform enhances analysis of compositional microbiota data
2017
Marine benthic diversity: a comparative study
10.1086/282541 · 1968
Proportion statistics to detect differentially expressed genes: a comparison with log-ratio statistics
2011
Proportionality: a valid alternative to correlation for relative data
2015
The nonconcept of species diversity: a critique and alternative parameters
10.2307/1934145 · 1971
To rarefy or not to rarefy: robustness and efficiency trade-offs of rarefying microbiome data
10.1093/bioinformatics/btac127 · 2022
10.1016/b978-0-323-85455-9.00014-x
10.1016/b978-0-323-85455-9.00014-x
10.1093/biomet/asu031
10.1093/biomet/asu031 · doi-reference
10.1038/s41564-021-01050-3
10.1038/s41564-021-01050-3 · doi-reference
10.1093/bioinformatics/bts342
10.1093/bioinformatics/bts342 · doi-reference
10.1002/9781119976462
10.1002/9781119976462 · doi-reference
10.1007/978-3-642-36809-7
10.1007/978-3-642-36809-7 · doi-reference
Zero-inflated Poisson regression, with an application to defects in manufacturing
10.2307/1269547 · doi-reference
Logratio transformation of compositional data: a resolution of the constant sum constraint
10.1016/s0377-8398(97)00047-9 · doi-reference
A folded model for compositional data analysis
10.1111/anzs.12289 · doi-reference
The helmert matrices
10.1080/00029890.1965.11970483 · doi-reference
10.1093/bioinformatics/bty175
10.1093/bioinformatics/bty175 · doi-reference
Improved classification for compositional data using the α-transformation
10.1007/s00357-016-9207-5 · doi-reference
Box–Cox transformations in the analysis of compositional data
10.1002/cem.1180050310 · doi-reference
Isometric logratio transformations for compositional data analysis
10.1023/a:1023818214614 · doi-reference
A chemo-ecologists' practical guide to compositional data analysis
10.1007/s00049-016-0227-8 · doi-reference
10.1109/sitis.2016.119
10.1109/sitis.2016.119 · doi-reference
Groups of parts and their balances in compositional data analysis
10.1007/s11004-005-7381-9 · doi-reference
Compositional data analysis of the microbiome: fundamentals, tools, and challenges
10.1016/j.annepidem.2016.03.002 · doi-reference
10.1002/9781119003144
10.1002/9781119003144 · doi-reference
10.1111/biom.13335
10.1111/biom.13335 · doi-reference
10.1007/978-3-031-13971-0_10
10.1007/978-3-031-13971-0_10 · doi-reference
Proportion-based normalizations outperform compositional data transformations in machine learning applications
10.1186/s40168-023-01747-z · doi-reference
Compositional data analysis
10.1146/annurev-statistics-042720-124436 · doi-reference
10.1214/lnms/1215463786
10.1214/lnms/1215463786 · doi-reference
10.1007/978-3-319-96422-5
10.1007/978-3-319-96422-5 · doi-reference
Robust differential abundance analysis of microbiome sequencing data
10.3390/genes14112000 · doi-reference
On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other
10.1214/aoms/1177730491 · doi-reference
Accommodating multiple potential normalizations in microbiome associations studies
10.1186/s12859-023-05147-w · doi-reference
Cauchy combination test: a powerful test with analytic p-value calculation under arbitrary dependency structures
10.1080/01621459.2018.1554485 · doi-reference
The inverse hyperbolic sine transformation and retransformed marginal effects
10.1177/1536867x221124553 · doi-reference
10.1111/obes.12325
10.1111/obes.12325 · doi-reference
Optimal inversion of the anscombe transformation in low-count Poisson image denoising
10.1109/tip.2010.2056693 · doi-reference
The transformation of Poisson, binomial and negative-binomial data
10.1093/biomet/35.3-4.246 · doi-reference
10.1214/20-sts778
10.1214/20-sts778 · doi-reference
Estimating Box-Cox power transformation parameter via goodness-of-fit tests
10.1080/03610918.2014.957839 · doi-reference
An analysis of transformations
10.1111/j.2517-6161.1964.tb00553.x · doi-reference
The arcsine is asinine: the analysis of proportions in ecology
10.1890/10-0340.1 · doi-reference
10.1201/b16654
10.1201/b16654 · doi-reference
10.1002/9781119976462.ch14
10.1002/9781119976462.ch14 · doi-reference
10.1126/science.79.2037.38
10.1126/science.79.2037.38 · doi-reference
10.1016/j.shpsc.2004.09.003
10.1016/j.shpsc.2004.09.003 · doi-reference