Abstract
No public abstract is available from the verified source records.
Sylviane Chassot, Nina Hampl, Rolf Wüstenhagen
Abstract
Authors
Institutions
No ROR-resolved institution is linked to this work yet.
Provenance
crossref
Confidence 100%
unpaywall
Confidence 95%
datacite
Confidence 0%
No local reference links have been materialized yet.
No local citing links have been materialized yet.
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Unresolved referenced work
2012
Unresolved referenced work
2009
Assessing and managing regulatory risk in renewable energy: contrasts between Canada and the United States
10.1016/j.enpol.2012.03.017 · 2012
Effectiveness through risk reduction: a comparison of the renewable obligation in England and Wales and the feed-in system in Germany
10.1016/j.enpol.2004.08.004 · 2006
The price of policy risk—empirical insights from choice experiments with European photovoltaic project developers
10.1016/j.eneco.2011.08.007 · 2012
Analyzing policy support instruments and regulatory risk factors for wind energy deployment—a developer's perspective
10.1016/j.enpol.2011.06.029 · 2011
Support systems for the diffusion of renewable energy technologies—an investor perspective
10.1016/j.enpol.2004.06.014 · 2006
Take-or-pay contracts for renewables deployment
10.1016/j.enpol.2008.02.017 · 2008
Impact of public policy uncertainty on renewable energy investment: wind power and the production tax credit
10.1016/j.enpol.2010.08.021 · 2010
A behavioral model of rational choice
10.2307/1884852 · 1955
Understanding carbon lock-in
10.1016/s0301-4215(00)00070-7 · 2000
Models of decision making and residential energy use
10.1146/annurev.energy.32.053006.141137 · 2007
Strategic choices for renewable energy investment: conceptual framework and opportunities for further research
10.1016/j.enpol.2011.06.050 · 2012
Automatically green: behavioral economics and environmental protection
2014
Which renewable energy policy is a venture capitalist's best friend? Empirical evidence from a survey of international clean energy investors
10.1016/j.enpol.2009.06.071 · 2009
Effective deployment of photovoltaics in the Mediterranean countries: balancing policy risk and return
10.1016/j.solener.2010.03.014 · 2010
Unresolved referenced work
1999
Unresolved referenced work
2013
Unresolved referenced work
2007
Unresolved referenced work
2008
Picking winners or building them? Alliance, intellectual, and human capital as selection criteria in venture financing and performance of biotechnology startups
10.1016/s0883-9026(03)00038-7 · 2004
Venture capital, innovation, and economic development
10.1177/089124249000400405 · 1990
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Venture capital investment in the Greentech industries: a provocative essay
2011
Criteria for corporate venturing: importance assigned by managers
10.1016/0883-9026(87)90025-5 · 1987
Criteria used by venture capitalists to evaluate new venture proposals
10.1016/0883-9026(85)90011-4 · 1985
Criteria distinguishing successful from unsuccessful ventures in the venture screening process
10.1016/0883-9026(87)90003-6 · 1987
In pursuit of the real deal: a longitudinal study of VC decision making
10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.07.002 · 2011
A model of venture capitalist investment activity
10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1051 · 1984
How venture capital works
1998
What you are is what you like—similarity biases in venture capitalists’ evaluations of start-up teams
10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.07.001 · 2006
Venture capitalists’ evaluations of start-up teams: trade-offs, knock-out criteria, and the impact of VC experience
10.1111/j.1540-6520.2008.00236.x · 2008
Do venture capitalists really invest in good industries? Risk-return perceptions and path dependence in the emerging European energy VC market
10.1504/ijtm.2006.009448 · 2006
The structure and management of alliances: syndication in the venture capital industry
10.1046/j.1467-6486.2003.00412.x · 2003
Risk as feelings
10.1037/0033-2909.127.2.267 · 2001
Unresolved referenced work
1970
Grid-group cultural theory: an introduction
10.1023/a:1007024008646 · 1999
Choosing preferences by constructing institutions: a cultural theory of preference formation
10.2307/1960776 · 1987
Orienting dispositions in the perception of risk: an analysis of contemporary worldviews and cultural biases
10.1177/0022022191221006 · 1991
Who invests in renewable electricity production? Empirical evidence and suggestions for further research
10.1016/j.enpol.2013.01.038 · doi-reference
Free-market ideology and environmental degradation: the case of belief in global climate change
10.1177/0013916505277998 · doi-reference
Household preferences for energy-saving measures: a conjoint analysis
10.1016/s0167-4870(02)00154-x · doi-reference
Estimating customer utility of energy efficiency standards for refrigerators
10.1016/s0167-4870(03)00072-2 · doi-reference
Willingness to pay for energy-saving measures in residential buildings
10.1016/j.eneco.2006.06.001 · doi-reference
Estimation on stated-preference experiments constructed from revealed-preference choices
10.1016/j.trb.2007.04.012 · doi-reference
Hypothetical bias, choice experiments and willingness to pay
10.1016/j.trb.2009.12.012 · doi-reference
Stated preferences analysis of travel choices—the state of practice
10.1007/bf01098788 · doi-reference
Using conjoint analysis to derive estimates of compensating variation
10.1006/jeem.1996.0037 · doi-reference
Marine protected areas—substantiating their worth
10.1016/j.marpol.2009.09.007 · doi-reference
Valuing watershed quality improvements using conjoint analysis
10.1016/s0921-8009(00)00153-1 · doi-reference
The random expenditure function approach to welfare in RUM: the case of hazardous waste clean-up
10.1016/j.reseneeco.2008.10.001 · doi-reference
Willingness to accept compensation for the environmental risks of oil transport on the Amazon: a choice modeling experiment
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.01.006 · doi-reference
A comparison of stated preference methods for environmental valuation
10.1016/0921-8009(96)00039-0 · doi-reference
A forecast of household ownership and use of alternative fuel vehicles: a multiple discrete-continuous choice approach
10.1016/j.eneco.2007.10.003 · doi-reference
Conjoint analysis in entrepreneurship research: a review and research agenda
10.1177/1094428109341992 · doi-reference
Conjoint analysis in marketing: new developments with implications for research and practice
10.2307/1251756 · doi-reference
Optimal investment, monitoring, and the staging of venture capital
10.1111/j.1540-6261.1995.tb05185.x · doi-reference
The development and deployment of low-carbon energy technologies: the role of economic interests and cultural worldviews on public support
10.1016/j.enpol.2014.01.018 · doi-reference
Whatever the customer wants, the customer gets? Exploring the gap between consumer preferences and default electricity products in Germany
10.1016/j.enpol.2012.10.061 · doi-reference
Exploring the link between products and service in low-income markets—evidence from solar home systems
10.1016/j.enpol.2012.10.038 · doi-reference
Willingness to pay for reduced visual disamenities from offshore wind farms in Denmark
10.1016/j.enpol.2007.01.023 · doi-reference
Using conjoint analysis to quantify public preferences over the environmental impacts of wind farms. An example from Spain
10.1016/s0301-4215(01)00063-5 · doi-reference
NASA faked the moon landing—therefore (climate) science is a hoax: an anatomy of the motivated rejection of science
10.1177/0956797612457686 · doi-reference
Renewable energy policy and public perceptions of renewable energy: a cultural theory approach
10.1016/j.enpol.2010.05.024 · doi-reference
The role of affect and worldviews as orienting dispositions in the perception and acceptance of nuclear power
10.1111/j.1559-1816.1996.tb00079.x · doi-reference