Abstract
No public abstract is available from the verified source records.
Hans Stubbe Solgaard, Wolfgang Haider
Abstract
Authors
Institutions
No ROR-resolved institution is linked to this work yet.
Provenance
crossref
Confidence 100%
unpaywall
Confidence 95%
datacite
Confidence 0%
No local citing links have been materialized yet.
Unresolved referenced work
2011
Unresolved referenced work
2005
What are we doing here? Analyzing fifteen years of energy scholarship and proposing a social science research agenda
10.1016/j.erss.2014.02.003 · 2014
Unresolved referenced work
2004
Market segmentation
2008
Rediscovering market segmentation
2006
Unresolved referenced work
1996
Unresolved referenced work
1996
Unresolved referenced work
2000
Unresolved referenced work
2011
Consumers in the green electricity market in Finland
10.1016/j.enpol.2005.08.008 · 2006
Choice experiment study on the willingness to pay to improve electricity services
10.1016/j.enpol.2010.04.012 · 2010
Willingness to pay for renewable energy: evidence from a contingent valuation survey in Kenya
10.1016/j.rser.2011.03.016 · 2011
Italian households’ willingness to pay for green electricity
10.1016/j.rser.2014.03.002 · 2014
Consumers’ willingness to pay for electricity from renewable energy sources, Queensland, Australia
2012
Willingness to pay for renewable electricity: a contingent valuation study in Beijing, China
10.1016/j.enpol.2013.11.032 · 2014
En klimaplan til Danmark
2009
Grøn el fra vindmøller
2007
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Unresolved referenced work
2012
Households’ switching behavior between electricity suppliers in Sweden
10.1016/j.jup.2008.04.005 · 2008
Consumers’ switching inertia in a fictitious electricity market
10.1111/j.1470-6431.2008.00728.x · 2008
Do consumers switch to the best supplier?
10.1093/oep/gpq006 · 2010
Consumer attitudes towards switching supplier in three deregulated markets
10.1016/j.socec.2009.05.002 · 2009
Understanding customer switching behavior in a liberalizing service market: an exploratory study
10.1177/1094670507306686 · 2007
Understanding household switching behavior in the retail electricity market
10.1016/j.enpol.2014.03.009 · 2014
Unresolved referenced work
2004
Whatever the customer wants, the customer gets? Exploring the gap between consumer preferences and default electricity products in Germany
10.1016/j.enpol.2012.10.061 · 2013
Unresolved referenced work
2009
Unresolved referenced work
2011
Understanding heterogeneous preferences in random utility models: a latent class approach
10.1023/a:1021351721619 · 2002
Unresolved referenced work
2002
Stated preference approaches for measuring passive use values: choice experiments and contingent valuation
10.2307/3180269 · 1998
Choice modelling approaches: a superior alternative for environmental valuation?
10.1111/1467-6419.00145 · 2001
Unresolved referenced work
2005
Unresolved referenced work
2012
Unresolved referenced work
2009
A latent class model for discrete choice analysis: contrasts with mixed logit
10.1016/s0191-2615(02)00046-2 · 2003
Mixed MNL models for discrete response
10.1002/1099-1255(200009/10)15:5<447::aid-jae570>3.0.co;2-1 · 2000
Preference heterogeneity for renewable energy technology
10.1016/j.eneco.2013.12.007 · 2014
Does willingness to pay for green energy differ by source?
10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.009 · doi-reference
The early adoption of green power by Dutch households – an empirical exploration of factors influencing the early adoption of green electricity for domestic purposes
10.1016/s0301-4215(03)00209-x · doi-reference
Norms and economic motivation in the Swedish green electricity market
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.02.013 · doi-reference
Determinants of green electricity adoption among residential customer in Germany
10.1111/j.1470-6431.2010.00896.x · doi-reference
Contingent valuation and real economic commitments: evidence from electric utility green pricing programmes
10.1080/09640569911190 · doi-reference
Behavioral frontiers in choice modeling
10.1007/s11002-008-9038-1 · doi-reference
Design techniques for stated preference methods in health economics
10.1002/hec.729 · doi-reference
Conditional Akaike information for mixed-effects models
10.1093/biomet/92.2.351 · doi-reference
The Akaike likelihood ratio index
10.1287/trsc.20.2.133 · doi-reference
Trading off health, environmental and genetic modification attributes in food
10.1093/erae/31.3.389 · doi-reference
Consumers and green electricity: profiling potential purchasers
10.1002/bse.346 · doi-reference
Consumer preference for a no-choice option
10.1086/209506 · doi-reference
Anomalies – the endowment effect, loss aversion, and status-quo bias
10.1257/jep.5.1.193 · doi-reference
Status quo bias in decision making
10.1007/bf00055564 · doi-reference
The importance of utility balance in efficient choice designs
10.2307/3152127 · doi-reference
Design efficiency for non-market valuation with choice modelling: how to measure it, what to report and why
10.1111/j.1467-8489.2007.00436.x · doi-reference
Designs with a priori information for nonmarket valuation with choice experiments: a Monte Carlo study
10.1016/j.jeem.2006.10.007 · doi-reference
Optimal design for multinomial choice experiments
10.1509/jmkr.39.2.214.19080 · doi-reference
Designs of discrete-choice set experiments for estimating both attribute and availability cross effects
10.2307/3152224 · doi-reference
Efficient experimental-design with marketing-research applications
10.2307/3151882 · doi-reference
Conducting discrete choice experiments to inform healthcare decision making: a user's guide
10.2165/00019053-200826080-00004 · doi-reference
How much are customers willing to pay for improvements in health and environmental quality?
10.1016/1040-6190(95)90038-1 · doi-reference
US consumers’ willingness to pay for green electricity
10.1016/s0301-4215(01)00006-4 · doi-reference
Customers’ choice among retail energy suppliers: the willingness-to-pay for service attributes
10.5547/issn0195-6574-ej-vol21-no4-1 · doi-reference
The link between green purchasing decisions and measures of environmental consciousness
10.1108/03090569610118740 · doi-reference
Motivational complexity of green consumerism
10.1111/j.1470-6431.2007.00586.x · doi-reference
Green buying: the influence of environmental concern on consumer behavior
10.1080/00224549709595430 · doi-reference
Diffusion of green power products in Switzerland
10.1016/s0301-4215(02)00147-7 · doi-reference
Adopting sustainable innovation: what makes consumers sign up to green electricity?
10.1002/bse.650 · doi-reference
The prediction of occupation using multiple logit models
10.2307/2525826 · doi-reference
A probabilistic choice model for market-segmentation and elasticity structure
10.2307/3172759 · doi-reference
On using demographic-variables to determine segment membership in logit mixture-models
10.2307/3151952 · doi-reference
A comparison of segment retention criteria for finite mixture logit models
10.1509/jmkr.40.2.235.19225 · doi-reference
Accounting for varying setting preferences among moose hunters
10.1080/01490400590930943 · doi-reference
A structural equation model of latent segmentation and product choice for cross-sectional revealed preference choice data
10.1016/0969-6989(94)90002-7 · doi-reference
A multi-attribute trade-off approach for advancing the management of marine wildlife tourism: a quantitative assessment of heterogeneous visitor preferences
10.1002/aqc.990 · doi-reference
Hierarchical Bayes versus finite mixture conjoint analysis models: a comparison of fit, prediction, and partworth recovery
10.1509/jmkr.39.1.87.18936 · doi-reference
Modeling interdependent consumer preferences
10.1509/jmkr.40.3.282.19240 · doi-reference
Bayesian statistics and marketing
10.1287/mksc.22.3.304.17739 · doi-reference
Revealing additional dimensions of preference heterogeneity in a latent class mixed multinomial logit model
10.1080/00036846.2011.650325 · doi-reference