Abstract
Alexander Maas, A.A. Trujillo Barrera, Susmita Chowdhury
Abstract
Authors
Institutions
Provenance
crossref
Confidence 100%
openalex
Confidence 95%
datacite
Confidence 0%
No local reference links have been materialized yet.
No local citing links have been materialized yet.
Preferences for alternative water supplies in the Pacific northwest: A discrete choice experiment
10.1061/(asce)wr.1943-5452.0001342 · 2021
Cross-cultural consumer valuation of precision fermentation Milk: Effects of information, individual traits, and labelling preferences
10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105570 · 2025
The effects of multiple health and nutrition labels on consumer food choices
10.1111/j.1477-9552.2010.00247.x · 2010
Can you ever be certain? Reducing hypothetical bias in stated choice experiments via respondent reported choice certainty
10.1016/j.trb.2016.04.004 · 2016
Unresolved referenced work
2001
What is it about organic Milk? An experimental analysis
10.1111/j.1467-8276.2009.01258.x · 2009
Consumer stated preferences for dairy products with carbon footprint labels in Italy
10.1186/s40100-019-0149-1 · 2020
The effects of improved performance in the U.S. dairy cattle industry on environmental impacts between 2007 and 2017
10.1093/jas/skz291 · 2020
A new baseline model for estimating willingness to pay from discrete choice models
10.1016/j.jeem.2019.03.003 · 2019
Unresolved referenced work
2018
Higher status, more actions but less sacrifice: The SES paradox in pro-environmental Behaviors
10.3390/su17156948 · 2025
On linking socioeconomic status to consumer willingness to buy and pay for organic food
10.1007/s13197-020-04618-9 · 2020
A willingness-to-purchase comparison of integrated Pest management and conventional produce
10.1002/(sici)1520-6297(199809/10)14:5<403::aid-agr6>3.0.co;2-7 · 1998
Statistical methods for the analysis of discrete choice experiments: A report of the ISPOR conjoint analysis good research practices task force
10.1016/j.jval.2016.04.004 · 2016
Choice experiments
2017
Examining consumers’ willingness to pay premium price for organic food (Humanities and Social Sciences Communications)
10.1057/s41599-024-03789-6 · 2024
Do Labeled versus Unlabeled treatments of alternatives’ names influence stated choice outputs? Results from a mode choice study
10.1371/journal.pone.0178826 · 2017
Behavioral framing and consumer acceptance of new food technologies: Factors influencing consumer demand for active packaging
10.1002/agr.21778 · 2023
Conducting discrete choice experiments to inform healthcare decision making: A user??S guide
10.2165/00019053-200826080-00004 · 2008
Will consumers pay a premium for eco-Labeled apples?
10.1111/j.1745-6606.2002.tb00430.x · 2002
Evaluating the effect of conservation motivations on residential water demand
10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.03.008 · 2017
Consumer preferences and willingness to pay for food Labeling: A discussion of empirical studies
2003
Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior
1973
Strategic bias in discrete choice experiments
10.1016/j.jeem.2018.08.010 · 2021
Unresolved referenced work
2015
Symposium review: Defining a pathway to climate neutrality for US dairy cattle production
10.3168/jds.2021-21413 · 2022
The effects of environmental sustainability labels on selection, purchase, and consumption of food and drink products: A systematic review
10.1177/0013916521995473 · 2021
Discrete choice experiment to evaluate factors that influence preferences for antibiotic prophylaxis in Pediatric oncology
10.1371/journal.pone.0047470 · 2012
Consumers’ perception of organic product characteristics. A review
10.1016/j.appet.2013.08.020 · 2013
Estimating organic premiums in the US fluid Milk market
10.1017/s1742170509002579 · 2009
Preferences for distributional impacts of climate policy
10.1007/s10640-019-00386-z · 2020
Using choice experiments to estimate the value of differentiated cow’s milk in Puerto Rico
10.3389/fsufs.2021.671049 · 2021
Greenhouse gas emissions from milk production and consumption in the United States: A cradle-to-grave life cycle assessment circa 2008
10.1016/j.idairyj.2012.08.013 · 2013
Unresolved referenced work
2020
Unresolved referenced work
2020
Unresolved referenced work
2024
Willingness to pay for the ‘green food’ in China
10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.01.003 · 2014
Willingness to pay for the ‘green food’ in China
10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.01.003 · doi-reference
Greenhouse gas emissions from milk production and consumption in the United States: A cradle-to-grave life cycle assessment circa 2008
10.1016/j.idairyj.2012.08.013 · doi-reference
Using choice experiments to estimate the value of differentiated cow’s milk in Puerto Rico
10.3389/fsufs.2021.671049 · doi-reference
Preferences for distributional impacts of climate policy
10.1007/s10640-019-00386-z · doi-reference
Estimating organic premiums in the US fluid Milk market
10.1017/s1742170509002579 · doi-reference
Consumers’ perception of organic product characteristics. A review
10.1016/j.appet.2013.08.020 · doi-reference
Discrete choice experiment to evaluate factors that influence preferences for antibiotic prophylaxis in Pediatric oncology
10.1371/journal.pone.0047470 · doi-reference
The effects of environmental sustainability labels on selection, purchase, and consumption of food and drink products: A systematic review
10.1177/0013916521995473 · doi-reference
Symposium review: Defining a pathway to climate neutrality for US dairy cattle production
10.3168/jds.2021-21413 · doi-reference
Strategic bias in discrete choice experiments
10.1016/j.jeem.2018.08.010 · doi-reference
Evaluating the effect of conservation motivations on residential water demand
10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.03.008 · doi-reference
Will consumers pay a premium for eco-Labeled apples?
10.1111/j.1745-6606.2002.tb00430.x · doi-reference
Conducting discrete choice experiments to inform healthcare decision making: A user??S guide
10.2165/00019053-200826080-00004 · doi-reference
Behavioral framing and consumer acceptance of new food technologies: Factors influencing consumer demand for active packaging
10.1002/agr.21778 · doi-reference
Do Labeled versus Unlabeled treatments of alternatives’ names influence stated choice outputs? Results from a mode choice study
10.1371/journal.pone.0178826 · doi-reference
Examining consumers’ willingness to pay premium price for organic food (Humanities and Social Sciences Communications)
10.1057/s41599-024-03789-6 · doi-reference
Statistical methods for the analysis of discrete choice experiments: A report of the ISPOR conjoint analysis good research practices task force
10.1016/j.jval.2016.04.004 · doi-reference
A willingness-to-purchase comparison of integrated Pest management and conventional produce
10.1002/(sici)1520-6297(199809/10)14:5<403::aid-agr6>3.0.co;2-7 · doi-reference
On linking socioeconomic status to consumer willingness to buy and pay for organic food
10.1007/s13197-020-04618-9 · doi-reference
Higher status, more actions but less sacrifice: The SES paradox in pro-environmental Behaviors
10.3390/su17156948 · doi-reference
A new baseline model for estimating willingness to pay from discrete choice models
10.1016/j.jeem.2019.03.003 · doi-reference
The effects of improved performance in the U.S. dairy cattle industry on environmental impacts between 2007 and 2017
10.1093/jas/skz291 · doi-reference
Consumer stated preferences for dairy products with carbon footprint labels in Italy
10.1186/s40100-019-0149-1 · doi-reference
What is it about organic Milk? An experimental analysis
10.1111/j.1467-8276.2009.01258.x · doi-reference
Can you ever be certain? Reducing hypothetical bias in stated choice experiments via respondent reported choice certainty
10.1016/j.trb.2016.04.004 · doi-reference
The effects of multiple health and nutrition labels on consumer food choices
10.1111/j.1477-9552.2010.00247.x · doi-reference
Cross-cultural consumer valuation of precision fermentation Milk: Effects of information, individual traits, and labelling preferences
10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105570 · doi-reference
Preferences for alternative water supplies in the Pacific northwest: A discrete choice experiment
10.1061/(asce)wr.1943-5452.0001342 · doi-reference