Abstract
Sonika Poudel, Omkar Joshi, Andres Susaeta, Lixia H. Lambert, Ryan DeSantis
Abstract
Authors
Institutions
Provenance
crossref
No local reference links have been materialized yet.
No local citing links have been materialized yet.
Discriminant validity assessment: use of Fornell & Larcker criterion versus HTMT criterion
10.1088/1742-6596/890/1/012163 · 2017
Explaining successful and failed investments in U.S. carbon capture and storage using empirical and expert assessments
10.1088/1748-9326/abd19e · 2020
Measuring the mathematical attitudes of elementary students: the effects of a 4-point or 5-point Likert-type scale
10.1177/0013164410366694 · 2010
Landowner willingness to accept monetary compensation for managing forests for ecosystem services in the southern United States
2022
Unresolved referenced work
2022
Farmers and nature conservation: what is known about attitudes, context factors and actions affecting conservation?
10.1017/s1742170508002391 · 2009
The theory of planned behavior
10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · 1991
South Carolina forestland owners’ willingness to accept compensations for carbon sequestration
10.1186/s40663-019-0175-1 · 2019
Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys
10.1177/002224377701400320 · 1977
Confidence 100%
openalex
Confidence 95%
datacite
Confidence 0%
Unresolved referenced work
1997
Farmer perspectives on carbon markets incentivizing agricultural soil carbon sequestration
10.1038/s44168-023-00055-4 · 2023
Family-forest owner decisions, landscape context, and landscape change
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.08.023 · 2019
Unresolved referenced work
1982
Unresolved referenced work
1989
The theory of planned behavior: selected recent advances and applications
10.5964/ejop.v16i3.3107 · 2020
Forest biodiversity, ecosystem functioning and the provision of ecosystem services
10.1007/s10531-017-1453-2 · 2017
Carbon sequestration and biodiversity co-benefits of preserving forests in the western United States
10.1002/eap.2039 · 2020
Unresolved referenced work
2016
Studies of family forest owners in the USA: a systematic review of literature from 2000 through 2019
10.1007/s11842-022-09529-5 · 2023
Factors influencing farmers’ intention to participate in the voluntary carbon market: an extended theory of planned behavior
10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122367 · 2024
Methodological challenges and approaches to improving response rates in population surveys in areas of extreme deprivation
10.1017/s1463423611000466 · 2012
A focus theory of normative conduct: recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places
10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.1015 · 1990
Using the theory of planned behavior to identify key beliefs underlying pro-environmental behavior in high-school students: implications for educational interventions
10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.03.005 · 2015
Unresolved referenced work
2014
Accountable accounting: carbon-based management on marginal lands
10.3390/f5040847 · 2014
Normative influences on carbon offset behavior: insights from organic farming practices
10.3390/su17041638 · 2025
Unresolved referenced work
2011
Forest landowners’ willingness to sell carbon credits: a pilot study
10.1093/njaf/26.1.35 · 2009
Baseline studies for marine education: experiences related to marine knowledge and attitudes
10.1080/00958964.1980.9941385 · 1980
Analysis of the production and transaction costs of forest carbon offset projects in the USA
10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.06.045 · 2012
West Virginia forest landowners’ preferences for forest carbon offset programs
10.1016/j.tfp.2024.100683 · 2024
Validity and reliability study of clinician attitude towards rural health extension program in Ethiopia: exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis
10.1186/s12913-022-08470-9 · 2022
Natural climate solutions
10.1073/pnas.1710465114 · 2017
Effects of socio-structural variables in the theory of planned behavior: a mediation model in multiple samples and behaviors
10.1080/08870446.2020.1784420 · 2021
Finnish forest owners’ intentions to participate in cooperative forest management
10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103420 · 2025
Managing nature-based solutions in fire-prone ecosystems: competing management objectives in California forests evaluated at a landscape scale
10.3389/ffgc.2022.957189 · 2022
Protecting climate with forests
10.1088/1748-9326/3/4/044006 · 2008
Assessing marginal land availability based on land use change information in the contiguous United States
10.1021/acs.est.1c02236 · 2021
Carbon markets for carbon dioxide removal
2025
Accounting for natural resources and environmental sustainability: linking ecosystem services to human well-being
10.1021/es902597u · 2010
Cropland abandonment between 1986 and 2018 across the United States: Spatiotemporal patterns and current land uses
10.1088/1748-9326/ad2d12 · doi-reference
Trading off nature for nature-based solutions: the bioeconomics of forest management for wildlife, timber, and carbon
10.1002/ecs2.4963 · doi-reference
Social values and the contingent nature of public opinion and attitudes about forests
10.5558/tfc79692-3 · doi-reference
Carbon storage on non-industrial private forestland: an application of the theory of planned behavior
10.1007/s11842-013-9235-5 · doi-reference
Ecocentric and anthropocentric attitudes toward the environment
10.1016/s0272-4944(05)80168-9 · doi-reference
Factor analysis: a means for theory and instrument development in support of construct validity
10.5116/ijme.5f96.0f4a · doi-reference
Challenging perceptions about men, women, and forest product use: a global comparative study
10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.03.003 · doi-reference
Landowner attitudes and willingness to accept compensation from forest carbon offsets: application of best–worst choice modeling in Florida, USA
10.1016/j.forpol.2015.12.004 · doi-reference
Comparison of response rates and cost-effectiveness for a community-based survey: postal, internet and telephone modes with generic or personalised recruitment approaches
10.1186/1471-2288-12-132 · doi-reference
Carbon storage potential of short rotation tropical tree plantations
10.1016/0378-1127(92)90312-w · doi-reference
Soil properties following reforestation or afforestation of marginal cropland
10.1007/s11104-012-1258-8 · doi-reference
United States family forest owners’ awareness of and participation in carbon sequestration programs: Initial findings from the USDA Forest Service National Woodland Owner Survey
10.1093/forsci/fxac026 · doi-reference
Improving communications to increase nonindustrial private forest landowner participation in forest certification programs: a case study in Arkansas, USA
10.3390/f13010086 · doi-reference
Breaking down biocentrism: two distinct forms of moral concern for nature
10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00905 · doi-reference
Environmental knowledge and attitudes
10.1080/00958964.1976.9941552 · doi-reference
Guiding public policy in gray spaces: a meta-study on land ownership conflicts (1987–2022)
10.1016/j.cities.2024.104803 · doi-reference
Professional judgment in non-industrial private forestry: forester attitudes and social norms influencing biodiversity conservation
10.1016/j.forpol.2009.09.007 · doi-reference
A review of Forest ecosystem services and their spatial value characteristics
10.3390/f15060919 · doi-reference
Carbon sequestration potential by afforestation of marginal agricultural land in the midwestern U.S
10.1016/j.foreco.2005.12.044 · doi-reference
The global potential for carbon capture and storage from forestry
10.1186/s13021-016-0044-y · doi-reference
Biodiversity and ecosystem services in forest ecosystems: a research agenda for applied forest ecology
10.1111/1365-2664.12669 · doi-reference
Economic returns and the perceived obstacles to adopting active management in the forest–grassland transition ecoregion in south-Central USA
10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118225 · doi-reference
Family forest landowners’ interest in forest carbon offset programs: focus group findings from the Lake states, USA
10.1007/s00267-014-0352-5 · doi-reference
An assessment of forest landowner interest in selling forest carbon credits in the Lake states, USA
10.1016/j.forpol.2012.09.009 · doi-reference
The environmental attitudes inventory: a valid and reliable measure to assess the structure of environmental attitudes
10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.09.001 · doi-reference
Responses of soil and water-related ecosystem services to landscape dynamics in the eastern Afromontane biodiversity hotspot
10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22639 · doi-reference
Distribution and dynamics of private forests across the United States
10.1016/j.forpol.2023.103143 · doi-reference
A revised scale for the measurement of ecological attitudes and knowledge
10.1037/h0084394 · doi-reference
The effect of cap-and-trade on sectoral emissions: evidence from California
10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114066 · doi-reference
Robbing Peter to pay Paul: the impact of California’s cap-and-trade program on toxic emissions
10.1287/mnsc.2023.03560 · doi-reference
The unseen effects of deforestation: biophysical effects on climate
10.3389/ffgc.2022.756115 · doi-reference
The importance of subjective norms for people who care what others think of them
10.1080/08870440412331300002 · doi-reference
Evaluating non-industrial private forest landowner willingness to manage for forest carbon sequestration in the southern United States
10.1016/j.forpol.2016.07.004 · doi-reference
The willingness of non-industrial private forest owners to enter California’s carbon offset market
10.1007/s00267-017-0918-0 · doi-reference
Forest owners’ stand improvement decisions: applying the theory of planned behavior
10.1016/j.forpol.2014.09.009 · doi-reference
Model setting and interpretation of results in research using structural equation Modeling: a checklist with guiding questions for reporting
10.1016/j.anr.2021.06.001 · doi-reference
Forest owners’ preferences for contract-based management to enhance environmental values versus timber production
10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102587 · doi-reference
Accounting for natural resources and environmental sustainability: linking ecosystem services to human well-being
10.1021/es902597u · doi-reference
Assessing marginal land availability based on land use change information in the contiguous United States
10.1021/acs.est.1c02236 · doi-reference
Protecting climate with forests
10.1088/1748-9326/3/4/044006 · doi-reference