Abstract
No public abstract is available from the verified source records.
Eoghan Casey
Abstract
Authors
Institutions
No ROR-resolved institution is linked to this work yet.
Provenance
crossref
Confidence 100%
unpaywall
Confidence 95%
datacite
Confidence 0%
No local reference links have been materialized yet.
No local citing links have been materialized yet.
Unresolved referenced work
2012
Unresolved referenced work
2004
Standards for the formulation of evaluative forensic science expert opinion
10.1016/j.scijus.2009.07.004 · 2009
Fundamentals of probability and statistical evidence in criminal proceedings (Practitioner guide No. 1), Guidance for Judges, Lawyers, Forensic Scientists and Expert Witnesses
2010
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Criminalistics course
2019
The LR does not exist
10.1016/j.scijus.2016.06.005 · 2016
Digital evidence, ‘absence’ of data and ambiguous patterns of reasoning
2016
Standardised nomenclature in forensic science
10.1016/s0015-7368(87)72787-x · 1987
The chequered past and risky future of digital forensics
10.1080/00450618.2018.1554090 · 2019
Error, uncertainty and loss in digital evidence
2002
Computers, and the Internet
2011
Unresolved referenced work
2013
Digital stratigraphy: contextual analysis of file system traces in forensic science
10.1111/1556-4029.13722 · 2018
Clearly conveying digital forensic results
10.1016/j.diin.2018.03.001 · 2018
The Kodak syndrome: risks and opportunities created by decentralization of forensic capabilities
2019
Unresolved referenced work
2020
Standardization of file recovery classification and authentication
10.1016/j.diin.2019.06.004 · 2019
A model for case assessment and interpretation
10.1016/s1355-0306(98)72099-4 · 1998
Unresolved referenced work
1983
Unresolved referenced work
2015
Unresolved referenced work
2017
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Case Assessment and Interpretation of Expert Evidence (Practitioner guide No. 4), Guidance for Judges, Lawyers, Forensic Scientists and Expert Witnesses
2015
The nature of forensic science opinion—a possible framework to guide thinking and practice in investigation and in court proceedings
10.1016/s1355-0306(06)71565-9 · 2006
Information evaluation: how one group of intelligence analysts go about the task
2011
Unresolved referenced work
2004
Discussion on how to implement a verbal scale in a forensic laboratory: Benefits, pitfalls and suggestions to avoid misunderstandings
10.1016/j.scijus.2016.05.009 · 2016
Unresolved referenced work
2019
History, historiography, and the hermeneutics of the hard drive
2013
Unresolved referenced work
2018
Interpretation of scientific evidence
10.1016/s1355-0306(96)72587-x · 1996
Context effects in forensic science: A review and application of the science of science to crime laboratory practice in the United States
10.1016/s1355-0306(03)71747-x · 2003
Unresolved referenced work
2019
Cognitive and human factors in digital forensics: problems, challenges, and the way forward
10.1016/j.diin.2019.03.011 · 2019
How should forensic scientists present source conclusions?
2018
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Unresolved referenced work
2019
Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases
1974
No additional external references are available.