Abstract
Maëlig Jacquet
Abstract
Authors
Institutions
No ROR-resolved institution is linked to this work yet.
Provenance
crossref
Confidence 100%
unpaywall
Confidence 95%
datacite
Confidence 0%
No local reference links have been materialized yet.
No local citing links have been materialized yet.
Unresolved referenced work
2004
Unresolved referenced work
2014
Improving the accuracy of automated facial age estimation to aid CSEM investigations
10.1016/j.diin.2019.01.024 · 2019
DeepUAge: improving underage age estimation accuracy to aid CSEM investigation
2020
Unresolved referenced work
2020
Unresolved referenced work
2019
Using computed similarity of distinctive digital traces to evaluate non-obvious links and repetitions in cyber-investigations
10.1016/j.diin.2018.01.002 · 2018
Unresolved referenced work
2017
Standardization of forming and expressing preliminary evaluative opinions on digital evidence
2020
Design tradeoffs for developing fragmented video carving tools
10.1016/j.diin.2014.05.010 · 2014
Standardization of file recovery classification and authentication
10.1016/j.diin.2019.06.004 · 2019
ENFSI guideline for evaluative reporting in forensic science: a primer for legal practitioners
2016
Unresolved referenced work
2017
Every shred helps: assembling evidence from orphaned JPEG fragments
10.1109/tifs.2019.2897912 · 2019
Unresolved referenced work
2009
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Explaining explanations: an overview of interpretability of machine learning
2018
Unresolved referenced work
2019
Unresolved referenced work
2016
Explainable artificial intelligence (xai)
2017
Unresolved referenced work
2019
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Automated face recognition in forensic science: review and perspectives
10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.110124 · 2020
Facing imbalanced data recommendations for the use of performance metrics
2013
Assessing AI output in legal decision-making with nearest Neighbors
2020
Machine learning & forensic science
10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.02.045 · 2019
Discussion on how to implement a verbal scale in a forensic laboratory: benefits, pitfalls and suggestions to avoid misunderstandings
10.1016/j.scijus.2016.05.009 · 2016
Unresolved referenced work
2020
Unresolved referenced work
2000
A guideline for the validation of likelihood ratio methods used for forensic evidence evaluation
10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.03.048 · 2017
Unresolved referenced work
2015
Forensic file carving
2017
Unresolved referenced work
2019
Digital orange juice
10.1080/15567280701721921 · 2008
A framework for harmonizing forensic science practices and digital/multimedia evidence
2018
Forensic-by-Design framework for cyber-physical cloud systems
10.1109/mcc.2016.5 · 2016
Reliable support: measuring calibration of likelihood ratios
10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.04.014 · 2013
A practitioner survey exploring the value of forensic tools, AI, filtering, & safer presentation for investigating child sexual abuse material (CSAM)
10.1016/j.diin.2019.04.005 · 2019
3.3. Metrics and scoring: quantifying the quality of predictions
2019
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
“Commentary: a ‘source’ of error: computer code, criminal defendants, and the constitution
10.3389/fgene.2017.00033 · doi-reference