Abstract
No public abstract is available from the verified source records.
Contact and support
Need help, have a question, or want to contact the ResearchHub team?
© 2026 ResearchHub. Built for responsible scholarly connection.
Privacy-aware community infrastructureNina Sunde
Abstract
Authors
Institutions
No ROR-resolved institution is linked to this work yet.
Provenance
crossref
Confidence 100%
unpaywall
Confidence 95%
datacite
Confidence 0%
No local reference links have been materialized yet.
No local citing links have been materialized yet.
Forensic psychiatry: the need for self-regulation
1992
Unresolved referenced work
2018
Bias: fejl og faldgruber i efterforskning
2013
Unresolved referenced work
2006
Peer review in forensic science
10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.05.020 · 2017
A perspective on errors, bias, and interpretation in the forensic sciences and direction for continuing advancement
10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01081.x · 2009
Unresolved referenced work
2011
Error and its meaning in forensic science
10.1111/1556-4029.12275 · 2014
Toward a science of digital forensic evidence examination
2010
The potential and Problems of peer evaluation in higher education and research
2007
Unresolved referenced work
2019
Cognitive and human factors in expert decision making: six fallacies and the eight sources of bias
10.1021/acs.analchem.0c00704 · 2020
Human expert performance in forensic decision making: seven different sources of bias
10.1080/00450618.2017.1281348 · 2017
Unresolved referenced work
2015
Unresolved referenced work
2019
Unresolved referenced work
2004
Forensic assessment
2004
Problems with peer review
10.1136/bmj.c1409 · 2010
“I couldn't find it your honour, it mustn't be there!”–Tool errors, tool limitations and user error in digital forensics
10.1016/j.scijus.2018.04.001 · 2018
Tool testing and reliability issues in the field of digital forensics
10.1016/j.diin.2019.01.009 · 2019
Part 1:-quality assurance mechanisms for digital forensic investigations: introducing the Verification of Digital Evidence (VODE) framework
2020
Unresolved referenced work
2017
Unresolved referenced work
2015
Unresolved referenced work
2013
Unresolved referenced work
2012
Accreditation and standardization in forensic science - present and future reliability of forensics examination and expertise
2019
The meaning of Daubert and what that means for forensic science
1993
Unresolved referenced work
2003
Cognitive bias and blindness: a global survey of forensic science examiners
10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.09.001 · 2017
Computer forensics: the need for standardization and certification
2004
February. Digital forensics: meeting the challenges of scientific evidence
2005
Cognitive bias in forensic anthropology: visual assessment of skeletal remains is susceptible to confirmation bias
10.1016/j.scijus.2013.11.003 · 2014
The value of 100% retrospective peer review in a forensic pathology practice
10.1016/j.jflm.2013.09.033 · 2013
A review of quality procedures in the UK forensic sciences: what can the field of digital forensics learn?
10.1016/j.scijus.2018.09.006 · 2019
January. Applying traditional forensic taxonomy to digital forensics
2008
An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU
10.1056/nejmoa061115 · 2006
Unresolved referenced work
2019
An approach to peer review in forensic pathology
10.1016/j.jflm.2013.02.010 · 2013
A systematic analysis of misleading evidence in unsafe rulings in England and Wales
10.1016/j.scijus.2017.09.005 · 2018
Research Policy: Problems with peer review and alternatives
10.1136/bmj.296.6624.774 · 1988
Peer-reviewed forensic consultation in practice: multidisciplinary oversight in common expertise
10.1111/1556-4029.12470 · doi-reference
Peer-reviewed forensic consultation: safeguarding expert testimony and protecting the uninformed court
10.1080/15228932.2011.588526 · doi-reference