Abstract
Abstract
Authors
Institutions
No ROR-resolved institution is linked to this work yet.
Provenance
crossref
Confidence 100%
pubmed
Confidence 98%
europepmc
Confidence 96%
unpaywall
Confidence 95%
doaj
Confidence 92%
datacite
Confidence 0%
No local reference links have been materialized yet.
No local citing links have been materialized yet.
Comparison of drug approval process in United States and Europe
2013
Contrasting clinical evidence for market authorisation of cardio-vascular devices in Europe and the USA: a systematic analysis of 10 devices based on Austrian pre-reimbursement assessments
10.1186/1471-2261-14-154 · 2014
Regulation of medical devices in the United States and European Union
10.1056/nejmhle1113918 · 2012
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Regulation of medicines and medical devices: contrasts and similarities
10.7861/clinmedicine.14-1-6 · 2014
Drugs, devices and the FDA: an overview of approval processes. Part 1 FDA approval processes for drugs
2016
Drugs, devices and the FDA: an overview of approval processes. Part 2 FDA approval of medical devices
2016
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Unresolved referenced work
2006
Regulatory review of novel therapeutics—comparison of three regulatory agencies
10.1056/nejmsa1200223 · 2012
Despite criticism of the FDA review process, new cancer drugs reach patients sooner in the United States than in Europe
10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0231 · 2011
Publication bias: a problem in interpreting medical data
10.2307/2982993 · 1988
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
How useful are unpublished data from the Food and Drug Administration in meta-analysis?
10.1016/s0895-4356(02)00520-6 · 2003
Opening up data at the European Medicines Agency
10.1136/bmj.d2686 · 2011
Regulation and safe adoption of new medical devices and procedures
10.1093/bmb/ldt022 · 2013
European medical device regulatory law and product liability
10.1016/s0195-6701(99)90083-x · 1999
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Improving medical device regulation: the United States and Europe in perspective
10.1111/1468-0009.12043 · 2014
Registration and regulation of medical devices used in diabetes in Europe: need for radical reform
10.1016/s2213-8587(13)70178-5 · 2013
The regulation of medical devices and the role of the Medical Devices Agency
10.1046/j.0306-5251.2001.01416.x · 2001
Understanding the medical device directive changes
10.2345/0899-8205-43.4.319 · 2009
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
EU and member state medical device regulation
10.1017/s0266462303000217 · 2003
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
How a fake hip showed up failings in the European device regulation
10.1136/bmj.e7090 · 2012
Medical device development: from prototype to regulatory approval
10.1161/01.cir.0000134695.65733.64 · 2004
The US Food and Drug Administration-European Medicines Agency collaboration in pharmacovigilance: common objectives and common challenges
10.1007/s40264-014-0259-3 · doi-reference
Assessment of cardiovascular and noncardiovascular medical device recalls
10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.03.024 · doi-reference
Medical-device recalls in the UK and the device regulation process: retrospective review of safety notices and recalls
10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000155 · doi-reference
Here we go again—another failure of postmarketing device surveillance
10.1056/nejmp1114695 · doi-reference
Deaths caused by failure of Riata and Riata ST implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads
10.1016/j.hrthm.2012.03.048 · doi-reference
Class I recall of defibrillator leads: a comparison of the Sprint Fidelis and Riata families
10.1016/j.hrthm.2012.04.003 · doi-reference
In search of the shocking truth
10.1016/j.hrthm.2012.05.005 · doi-reference
Medical device regulation: time to improve performance
10.1371/journal.pmed.1001277 · doi-reference
The saga of Poly Implant Prosthèse breast implants
10.1136/bmj.e306 · doi-reference
The Poly Implant Prosthèse breast prosthesis scandal: embodied risk and social suffering
10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.10.068 · doi-reference
Post marketing surveillance and vigilance for medical devices: the European approach
10.2165/00002018-200124120-00001 · doi-reference
Approvals of drugs with uncertain benefit-risk profiles in Europe
10.1016/j.ejim.2015.08.008 · doi-reference
Paying for drug approval—who's using whom?
10.1056/nejmp078041 · doi-reference
Balancing early market access to new drugs with the need for benefit/risk data: a mounting dilemma
10.1038/nrd2664 · doi-reference
Can the pharmaceutical industry reduce attrition rates?
10.1038/nrd1470 · doi-reference
Trial watch: phase II and submission failures 2007-2010
10.1038/nrd3375 · doi-reference
The epidemiology of drug recalls in the United States
10.1001/archinternmed.2012.2013 · doi-reference
Medical devices–balancing regulation and innovation
10.1056/nejmp1109094 · doi-reference
The 501(k) ancestry of a metal-on-metal hip implant
10.1056/nejmp1211581 · doi-reference
Medical device recalls and the FDA approval process
10.1001/archinternmed.2011.30 · doi-reference
Review of the processes for FDA oversight of drugs, medical devices and combination products
10.18553/jmcp.2011.17.1.40 · doi-reference
The FDA approval process for medical devices: an inherently flawed system or a valuable pathway for innovation?
10.1136/neurintsurg-2012-010400 · doi-reference
Medical devices and the approval processes: United States vs. France
10.1001/archinternmed.2010.454 · doi-reference
Commentary: the risk of over-regulation
10.1136/bmj.d3021 · doi-reference
Only 3 in 20 new drugs approved in Germany in 2011 were an improvement, report says
10.1136/bmj.g2657 · doi-reference
Patient access to medical devices—a comparison of U.S. and European review processes
10.1056/nejmp1204170 · doi-reference
Postmarketing surveillance of medical devices—filling in the gaps
10.1056/nejmp1114865 · doi-reference
How does medical device approval regulation perform in the United States and the European Union? A systematic review
10.1371/journal.pmed.1001276 · doi-reference
Devices and desires: industry fights toughening of medical device regulation in Europe
10.1136/bmj.f6204 · doi-reference
The truth behind “made in Europe” labels on medical devices
10.1136/bmj.e7193 · doi-reference
The EU's system for regulating medical devices: now is the time for radical change
10.1136/bmj.e7126 · doi-reference
Europeans are left to their own devices
10.1136/bmj.d2748 · doi-reference