Abstract
No public abstract is available from the verified source records.
Zehua Zhang, Parisa Izadpanahi, Lee Roberts
Abstract
Authors
Institutions
No local reference links have been materialized yet.
No local citing links have been materialized yet.
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Active transport research priorities for Australia
2022
Developing urban cycling typologies: quantifying the complex interactions of bicycle ridership, bicycle network and built environment characteristics
10.1177/23998083221100827 · 2023
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Modeling and analyzing urban networks and amenities with OSMnx
Provenance
crossref
Confidence 100%
openalex
Confidence 95%
datacite
Confidence 0%
10.1111/gean.70009 · 2025
A systematic review of economic analyses of active transport interventions that include physical activity benefits
10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.10.003 · 2016
Why isn’t Australia a cycling mecca
2018
Modern urban transport infrastructure solutions to improve the safety of children as pedestrians and cyclists
10.3390/infrastructures6070102 · 2021
Which cycling environment appears safer? Learning cycling safety perceptions from pairwise image comparisons
10.1109/tits.2024.3507639 · 2025
Do tourists value different levels of cycling infrastructure?
10.1016/j.tourman.2014.06.012 · 2015
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Cyclability in London: associations between the quality of the local cycling environment, cycling participation, and perceptions of the cycling environment
2026
Incorporating equity into active commuting to school infrastructure projects: a case study
2022
Subjectively safe cycling infrastructure: new insights for urban designs
2022
Towards a comprehensive safety evaluation of cycling infrastructure including objective and subjective measures
10.1016/j.jth.2017.12.003 · 2018
Bikeability in Basel
10.1177/0361198119839982 · 2019
Inequalities in access to bike-and-ride opportunities: findings for the city of Malmö
10.1016/j.tra.2019.09.062 · 2019
Can providing safe cycling infrastructure encourage people to cycle more when it rains? The use of crowdsourced cycling data (Strava)
10.1016/j.tra.2020.01.008 · 2020
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Assessing bikeability with street view imagery and computer vision
2021
Assessment of communitywide bikeability with bicycle level of service
10.3141/2314-06 · 2012
Gdverse: an R package for spatial stratified heterogeneity family
10.1111/tgis.70032 · 2025
Critical factors for active transportation to school among low-income and minority students: evidence from the 2001 National Household Travel Survey
10.1016/j.amepre.2008.01.004 · 2008
Bikeability and the 20-min neighborhood: how infrastructure and destinations influence bicycle accessibility
10.3141/2247-07 · 2011
Getting more children walking and cycling to school: insights from parents in three Australian cities
2017
Bikeability – urban structures supporting cycling. Effects of local, urban and regional scale urban form factors on cycling from home and workplace locations in Denmark
10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.04.015 · 2018
School bikeability – what is it, and why is it important? An overview of key indicators and measurement
10.1080/01441647.2024.2405218 · 2025
School bikeability index: a case study of primary schools in Stockholm
2025
The potential for bike riding across entire cities: quantifying spatial variation in interest in bike riding
2022
The link between socioeconomic position, access to cycling infrastructure and cycling participation rates: an ecological study in Melbourne, Australia
10.1016/j.jth.2014.09.011 · 2014
Spatial disparity of urban performance from a scaling perspective: a study of industrial features associated with economy, infrastructure, and innovation
10.1080/15481603.2023.2167567 · doi-reference
Spatial big data and analysis strategies supporting geographic information system for transportation (GIS-T) in conceptual design, modelling, and decision-making: a review
10.5194/isprs-annals-x-4-2024-461-2024 · doi-reference
Are there safe cycleways for school travel? Where are more cycleways needed?
10.1016/j.tranpol.2024.06.005 · doi-reference
Policies to promote active travel: evidence from reviews of the literature
10.1007/s40572-017-0148-x · doi-reference
A measure of spatial stratified heterogeneity
10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.02.052 · doi-reference
The effect of sharrows, painted bicycle lanes and physically protected paths on the severity of bicycle injuries caused by motor vehicles
10.3390/safety2040026 · doi-reference
Estimating the safety benefit of separated cycling infrastructure adjusted for behavioral adaptation among drivers; an application of agent-based modelling
10.1016/j.trf.2017.05.006 · doi-reference
Common ground: eight factors that influence walking and cycling to school
10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.06.016 · doi-reference
Walking and bicycling to school: a review
10.1177/1559827608320127 · doi-reference
Choosing safe and suitable bicycle routes to integrate cycling and public transport systems
10.1016/j.jth.2018.05.011 · doi-reference
Benefits of shift from car to active transport
10.1016/j.tranpol.2011.09.008 · doi-reference
Cycling down under: a comparative analysis of bicycling trends and policies in Sydney and Melbourne
10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.02.007 · doi-reference
Bikeability: assessing the objectively measured environment in relation to recreation and transportation bicycling
10.1177/0013916518825289 · doi-reference
The link between socioeconomic position, access to cycling infrastructure and cycling participation rates: an ecological study in Melbourne, Australia
10.1016/j.jth.2014.09.011 · doi-reference
School bikeability – what is it, and why is it important? An overview of key indicators and measurement
10.1080/01441647.2024.2405218 · doi-reference
Bikeability – urban structures supporting cycling. Effects of local, urban and regional scale urban form factors on cycling from home and workplace locations in Denmark
10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.04.015 · doi-reference
Bikeability and the 20-min neighborhood: how infrastructure and destinations influence bicycle accessibility
10.3141/2247-07 · doi-reference
Critical factors for active transportation to school among low-income and minority students: evidence from the 2001 National Household Travel Survey
10.1016/j.amepre.2008.01.004 · doi-reference
Gdverse: an R package for spatial stratified heterogeneity family
10.1111/tgis.70032 · doi-reference
Assessment of communitywide bikeability with bicycle level of service
10.3141/2314-06 · doi-reference
Can providing safe cycling infrastructure encourage people to cycle more when it rains? The use of crowdsourced cycling data (Strava)
10.1016/j.tra.2020.01.008 · doi-reference
Inequalities in access to bike-and-ride opportunities: findings for the city of Malmö
10.1016/j.tra.2019.09.062 · doi-reference
Bikeability in Basel
10.1177/0361198119839982 · doi-reference
Towards a comprehensive safety evaluation of cycling infrastructure including objective and subjective measures
10.1016/j.jth.2017.12.003 · doi-reference
Do tourists value different levels of cycling infrastructure?
10.1016/j.tourman.2014.06.012 · doi-reference
Which cycling environment appears safer? Learning cycling safety perceptions from pairwise image comparisons
10.1109/tits.2024.3507639 · doi-reference
Modern urban transport infrastructure solutions to improve the safety of children as pedestrians and cyclists
10.3390/infrastructures6070102 · doi-reference
A systematic review of economic analyses of active transport interventions that include physical activity benefits
10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.10.003 · doi-reference
Modeling and analyzing urban networks and amenities with OSMnx
10.1111/gean.70009 · doi-reference
Developing urban cycling typologies: quantifying the complex interactions of bicycle ridership, bicycle network and built environment characteristics
10.1177/23998083221100827 · doi-reference