Abstract
Introduction
Patients considering total knee arthroplasty (TKA) frequently seek online guidance on indications, risks, recovery, rehabilitation, and precautions. While authoritative sources exist, generative AI chatbots are increasingly used for rapid answers, yet their quality, usability, and transparency may vary.Methods
In this cross-sectional comparative study, five common TKA patient FAQs were selected using clinic FAQs, AAOS OrthoInfo, search trends, and Delphi panel validation. Nine chatbots were accessed on 21 March 2026 using free public interfaces, in incognito sessions with cleared cookies. Queries were zero-shot, using only each question text. Each chatbot's five answers were pooled into a single "5-answer packet." Seven orthopaedic specialists, blinded to model identity, scored each packet using QUEST, DISCERN, PEMAT-Understandability/Actionability (PEMAT-U/A), JAMA Benchmarks, Trust (1-5), and Global Quality Score (GQS, 1-5). Inter-rater reliability was assessed via ICC (two-way random effects, absolute agreement, average measures). Model differences were tested using one-way ANOVA with Tukey HSD, reporting η2 effect sizes (α = 0.05).Results
ICC-average ranged 0.765-0.941. All scales differed significantly by model (ANOVA: QUEST F = 5.931; DISCERN F = 4.182; PEMAT-U F = 6.394; PEMAT-A F = 4.948; JAMA F = 17.083; Trust F = 4.031; GQS F = 4.477; all p ≤ 0.001; η2 0.374-0.717). DeepSeek had the highest DISCERN mean (70.57 ± 2.64), ChatGPT-4o the highest PEMAT-U/A (86.62 ± 4.45; 83.38 ± 9.81), and Microsoft Copilot the highest JAMA mean (2.00 ± 0.00).Conclusion
AI chatbot performance for TKA FAQs is domain-dependent across quality, usability, and transparency. These findings have direct implications for orthopedic practice, particularly in preoperative patient counseling and shared decision-making in TKA.