Abstract
Contact and support
Need help, have a question, or want to contact the ResearchHub team?
© 2026 ResearchHub. Built for responsible scholarly connection.
Junhao Zheng, Xurui Ren, Liye Tao, Zefeng Shen, Qifan Zhang, Jiwei Huang, Dalong Yin
Abstract
Authors
Institutions
No ROR-resolved institution is linked to this work yet.
Provenance
crossref
Confidence 100%
unpaywall
Confidence 95%
No local reference links have been materialized yet.
No local citing links have been materialized yet.
Cancer incidence and mortality in China, 2022
2024
What has changed after the Morioka consensus conference 2014 on laparoscopic liver resection?
10.21037/hbsn.2016.03.03 · 2016
A novel model for prediction of pure laparoscopic liver resection surgical difficulty
10.1007/s00464-017-5616-8 · 2017
Difficulty of laparoscopic liver resection: proposal for a new classification
10.1097/sla.0000000000002176 · 2018
Development and validation of a difficulty score to predict intraoperative complications during laparoscopic liver resection
10.1002/bjs.10821 · 2018
Advances in the surgical treatment of liver cancer
10.5582/bst.2022.01245 · 2022
Developments and perspectives of laparoscopic liver resection in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma
10.1007/s00595-019-1765-9 · 2019
Laparoscopic liver resection of segments 7 and 8: from the initial restrictions to the current indications
10.7602/jmis.2020.23.1.5 · 2020
Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in elderly patients: systematic review and meta-analysis of propensity-score matched studies
10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106821 · 2022
datacite
Confidence 0%
Operative and hepatic function outcomes of laparoscopic vs. open liver resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
2023
Laparoscopic liver resection: indications, limitations, and economic aspects
10.1007/s00423-020-01918-8 · 2020
Impact of tumor size on the difficulty of minimally invasive liver resection
10.1016/j.ejso.2021.08.019 · 2022
Laparoscopic liver resection for large HCC: short- and long-term outcomes in relation to tumor size
10.1007/s00464-018-6225-x · 2018
Are large hepatocellular carcinomas still a contraindication for laparoscopic liver resection?
10.1089/lap.2014.0226 · 2015
Impact of tumor size on the difficulty of laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomies
10.1002/jhbp.1279 · 2023
Utilization of 3D printing technology in hepatopancreatobiliary surgery
10.1631/jzus.b2300175 · 2024
Challenging scenarios and debated indications for laparoscopic liver resections for hepatocellular carcinoma
10.3390/cancers15051493 · 2023
Risk factors and outcomes of open conversion during minimally invasive major hepatectomies: an international multicenter study on 3880 procedures comparing the laparoscopic and robotic approaches
10.1245/s10434-023-13525-0 · 2023
Impact of liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension on minimally invasive limited liver resection for primary liver malignancies in the posterosuperior segments: an international multicenter study
10.1016/j.ejso.2023.106997 · 2023
Construction and validation of a risk-prediction model for anastomotic leakage after radical gastrectomy: a cohort study in China
10.1016/j.lers.2024.02.003 · 2024
Development and validation of a predictive nomogram for the pregnancy rate after tubal anastomosis in women with tubal ligation
10.1016/j.lers.2025.05.001 · 2025
Systematic review and meta-analysis of difficulty scoring systems for laparoscopic and robotic liver resections
10.1002/jhbp.1211 · 2023
Validation and comparison of the Iwate, IMM, Southampton and Hasegawa difficulty scoring systems for primary laparoscopic hepatectomies
10.1016/j.hpb.2020.09.015 · 2021
Validation of the Iwate scoring system for the stratification of laparoscopic liver resections: an international multicenter study
10.1016/j.ejso.2025.109597 · 2025
External validation of Tampa difficulty scoring system for robotic liver resection using Americas Minimally Invasive Liver surgery registry (AMILES)
10.1007/s00464-025-12191-5 · 2025
No additional external references are available.