Comparative accuracy of three orthodontic software platforms for mesiodistal tooth-width measurements and bolton analyses in patients with mild to moderate crowding: A retrospective study

Objective The primary aim of this study was to compare mesiodistal tooth-width measurements and Bolton analysis outputs generated by three orthodontic software platforms (3Shape OrthoAnalyzer®, uDesign®, and Titan Dental Design™) against a physical caliper control. The study utilized pre- and post-treatment digital models from patients with mild to moderate crowding. The secondary aim of this study was to assess the effect of mild to moderate crowding on the accuracy of mesiodistal tooth-width measurements of these same three orthodontic software platforms.Material and methods A retrospective analysis was conducted using de-identified pre- and post-treatment digital models from 14 orthodontic patients with mild to moderate crowding treated at Louisiana State University School of Dentistry. All models were acquired via intraoral scanning and processed through each platform's automated segmentation workflow. Physical control models were 3D printed from the same STL files and measured with a digital caliper. Linear mixed-effects models with Tukey-adjusted pairwise comparisons were used for statistical analysis.Results Mesiodistal tooth-width measurements differed significantly among all three platforms (PConclusions Statistically significant but subclinical differences exist among orthodontic software platforms in mesiodistal tooth-width measurements and Bolton analyses. Clinicians are encouraged to maintain consistency in platform use and exercise informed judgment when interpreting software-generated Bolton analyses, particularly for overall ratios and posterior teeth.