Abstract
Contact and support
Need help, have a question, or want to contact the ResearchHub team?
© 2026 ResearchHub. Built for responsible scholarly connection.
Robert L. Taylor Jr, Paul B. Siegel, Christopher M. Ashwell, Christa F. Honaker, Henk K. Parmentier, Anna Wolc, Amy M. McCarron, Ashlee R. Lund, Janet E. Fulton
Abstract
Authors
Institutions
No ROR-resolved institution is linked to this work yet.
Provenance
crossref
Confidence 100%
pubmed
Confidence 98%
europepmc
Confidence 96%
unpaywall
Confidence 95%
doaj
Confidence 92%
datacite
Confidence 0%
No local reference links have been materialized yet.
No local citing links have been materialized yet.
Genetic variation of blood groups in inbred lines of Leghorns, derived from a common base population
10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a109481 · 1981
Influence of the major histocompatibility complex on disease resistance and productivity
10.3382/ps.0660802 · 1987
Genetic regulation of immunoresponsiveness in relation to resistance against infectious diseases
1982
Selection of lines of mice with high and low antibody responses to complex immunogens
1975
Artificial selection for antibody production in mice
1968
Non-major histocompatibility complex alloantigen genes affecting immunity
10.1093/ps/83.4.606 · 2004
Using Drosophila melanogaster as a model for genotoxic chemical mutational studies with a new program
2012
H-2 typing of mice genetically selected for high or low antibody production
10.1007/bf01561433 · 1979
Avian blood groups
1992
Allelic frequencies in eight alloantigen systems of chickens selected for high and low response to sheep red blood cells
10.3382/ps.0631470 · 1984
Antibody responses to combinations of antigens in white Leghorn chickens of different background genomes and major histocompatibility complex genotypes
10.3382/ps.0711801 · 1992
Antibody responses to sheep erythrocytes for White Leghorn chickens differing in haplotypes of the major histocompatibility complex (B)
10.1111/j.1365-2052.1989.tb00859.x · 1989
Resistance to Marek’s disease in chickens selected for high and low antibody response to sheep erythrocytes
1986
Age and body weight at sexual maturity in female White Leghorn chickens
10.3382/ps.0630828 · 1984
Effect of MHC haplotype on mortality due to Marek’s disease in commercial laying hens
10.3390/ani15111647 · 2025
The chicken A and E blood group systems are due to variation in proteins encoded by genes within the chicken RCA syntenic gene region
10.4049/jimmunol.2101010 · 2022
CD99 and the chicken alloantigen D blood system
10.3390/genes14020402 · 2023
The RHCE gene encodes the chicken blood system I
10.1186/s12711-024-00911-9 · 2024
A high-density SNP panel reveals extensive diversity, frequent recombination and multiple recombination hotspots within the chicken major histocompatibility complex B region between BG2 and CD1A1
10.1186/s12711-015-0181-x · 2016
Production and persistence of antibodies in chickens to sheep erythrocytes. 2. Resistance to infectious diseases
10.3382/ps.0590205 · 1980
The effect of selection and genetic factors on resistance to disease in fowls: a review
10.1079/wps19850002 · 1985
Growth of white Leghorn chicken immune organs after long-term divergent selection for high or low antibody response to sheep red blood cells
10.3390/ani14101487 · 2024
Phagocytic activity of two lines of chickens divergently selected for antibody production
10.1016/0165-2427(94)05304-b · 1995
On individual differences of the blood of chickens and ducks
10.3181/00379727-22-52 · 1924
Co-evolution of the humoral immune and serotonergic systems in chickens selected for high or low blood antibody titer response to sheep red blood cells
10.1016/j.psj.2024.104699 · 2025
CD99: a key regulator in immune response and tumor microenvironment
10.3390/biom15050632 · 2025
Marek’s disease and major histocompatibility complex haplotypes in chickens selected for high or low antibody response
10.1111/j.1365-2052.1989.tb00896.x · 1989
Production traits and alloantigen systems in lines of chickens selected for high or low antibody response to sheep erythrocytes
10.3382/ps.0690871 · 1990
Inheritance of antibody response to sheep erythrocytes in lines of chickens divergently selected for fifty-six-day body weight and their crosses
10.3382/ps.0710047 · 1992
Brief review of the chicken major histocompatibility complex – the genes, their distribution on chromosome 16 and their contribution to disease resistance
10.3382/ps/pev379 · 2016
Interaction of H-2 and non H-2 linked genes in the regulation of antibody response to a threshold dose of sheep erythrocytes
10.1007/bf01561457 · 1979
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
The chicken major histocompatibility complex (MHC-B) and alloantigen systems A, D, E, and I impact resistance to coccidiosis
10.1016/j.psj.2025.105151 · 2025
Differences in the microbiome of the small intestine of Leghorn lines divergently selected for antibody titer to sheep erythrocytes suggest roles for commensals in host humoral response
2025
Immune responses and resistance to Eimeria acervulina of chickens divergently selected for antibody responses to sheep red blood cells
10.1093/ps/80.7.894 · 2001
Different levels of natural antibodies in chickens divergently selected for specific antibody responses
10.1016/s0145-305x(03)00087-9 · 2004
Cutaneous hypersensitivity responses in chickens divergently selected for antibody responses to sheep red blood cells
10.3382/ps.0721679 · 1993
Immune responses to bovine serum albumin in chicken lines divergently selected for antibody responses to sheep red blood cells
10.3382/ps.0730825 · 1994
Antibody responses and body weights of chicken lines selected for high and low humoral responsiveness to sheep red blood cells. 1. Effect of Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide
10.1093/ps/77.2.248 · 1998
Effect of divergent selection for immune responsiveness and of major histocompatibility complex on resistance to Marek's disease in chickens
10.3382/ps.0720391 · 1993
Chicken MHC class I and II gene effects on antibody response kinetics in adult chickens
10.1007/s00251-003-0566-9 · doi-reference
Phenotypic responses of chickens to long-term selection for high or low antibody titers to sheep red blood cells
10.3382/ps.2011-01892 · doi-reference
Genetic parameters for levels of natural antibodies in chicken lines divergently selected for specific antibody response
10.3382/ps.2009-00064 · doi-reference
An inadequate pulmonary vascular capacity and susceptibility to pulmonary arterial hypertension in broilers
10.1093/ps/86.5.984 · doi-reference
Immune effects of chicken non-Mhc alloantigens
10.3382/ps/pev331 · doi-reference
Identifying chicken alloantigens to understand their influence on disease and production traits
10.1016/j.psj.2025.106020 · doi-reference
Selection for pro-inflammatory mediators produces chickens more resistant to Eimeria tenella
10.3382/ps/peu053 · doi-reference
Selection for pro-inflammatory mediators yields chickens with increased resistance against Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis
10.3382/ps.2013-03559 · doi-reference
Selection for pro-inflammatory mediators produces chickens more resistant to Clostridium perfringens-induced necrotic enteritis
10.3382/ps/pev348 · doi-reference
Chickens selected for high and low antibody responses to sheep red blood cells influence cytokine and chemokine expression in peripheral blood leukocytes and splenic tissue
10.1016/j.psj.2024.103972 · doi-reference
Production and persistence of antibodies in chickens to sheep erythrocytes. 1. Directional selection
10.3382/ps.0590001 · doi-reference
Multigenerational selection for high or low antibody responses to sheep red blood cells modulates the chicken cecal microbiome and its evolutionary relationship to immune and serotonergic systems
10.1016/j.psj.2025.104943 · doi-reference
Relationship of blood type to histocompatibility in chickens
10.1126/science.134.3484.1008 · doi-reference
Current understanding of natural antibodies and exploring the possibilities of modulation using veterinary models
10.3389/fimmu.2020.02139 · doi-reference
Innovative layer genetics to handle global challenges in egg production
10.1080/00071668.2018.1401828 · doi-reference