Abstract
No public abstract is available from the verified source records.
Open public full textRights: ALLOWED · cc-by · Source: journal-auto-sync:external:CROSSREF_ISSN
Atsushi Mizumoto, Masaki Eguchi
Open the manuscript using the link above. DOC files open in Word or a compatible document reader.
Abstract
Rights: ALLOWED · cc-by · Source: journal-auto-sync:external:CROSSREF_ISSN
Open the manuscript using the link above. DOC files open in Word or a compatible document reader.
Authors
Institutions
No ROR-resolved institution is linked to this work yet.
Provenance
crossref
Confidence 100%
unpaywall
Confidence 95%
datacite
Confidence 0%
No local reference links have been materialized yet.
No local citing links have been materialized yet.
Open the manuscript using the link above. DOC files open in Word or a compatible document reader.
Validity and reliability of automated essay scoring
2013
Automated essay scoring with e-rater® v.2.0
10.1002/j.2333-8504.2004.tb01972.x · 2004
Scoring with the computer: Alternative procedures for improving the reliability of holistic essay scoring
10.1177/0265532212452396 · 2013
TOEFL11: A corpus of non-native English
10.1002/j.2333-8504.2013.tb02331.x · 2013
brms: An R package for Bayesian multilevel models using Stan
10.18637/jss.v080.i01 · 2017
The e-rater® automated essay scoring system
2013
Beyond the design of automated writing evaluation: Pedagogical practices and perceived learning effectiveness in EFL writing classes
10.64152/10125/44145 · 2008
Large-scale assessment, locally-developed measures, and automated scoring of essays: Fishing for red herrings?
10.1016/j.asw.2012.11.001 · 2013
Unresolved referenced work
2014
Advancing research in second language writing through computational tools and machine learning techniques: A research agenda
10.1017/s0261444812000547 · 2013
Linguistic features in writing quality and development: An overview
10.17239/jowr-2020.11.03.01 · 2020
Assessing writing with the tool for the automatic analysis of lexical sophistication (TAALES)
10.1016/j.asw.2018.06.004 · 2018
The Tool for the automatic analysis of cohesion 2.0: Integrating semantic similarity and text overlap
10.3758/s13428-018-1142-4 · 2019
The tool for the automatic analysis of text cohesion (TAACO): Automatic assessment of local, global, and text cohesion
10.3758/s13428-015-0651-7 · 2016
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
An overview of automated scoring of essays
2006
Automated Essay Scoring feedback for second language writers: How does it compare to instructor feedback?
10.1016/j.asw.2014.03.006 · 2014
Attention-based recurrent convolutional neural network for automatic essay scoring
2017
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Complementing human judgment of essays written by English language learners with e-rater® scoring
10.1177/0265532210363144 · 2010
7 things you should know about ChatGPT
2023
R-squared for Bayesian regression models
10.1080/00031305.2018.1549100 · 2019
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Automated language essay scoring systems: A literature review
10.7717/peerj-cs.208 · 2019
Lexical sophistication as a multidimensional phenomenon: Relations to second language lexical proficiency, development, and writing quality
10.1111/modl.12447 · 2018
Student engagement with automated written corrective feedback (AWCF) provided by Grammarly: A multiple case study
10.1016/j.asw.2020.100450 · 2020
Explainable automated essay scoring: Deep learning really has pedagogical value
10.3389/feduc.2020.572367 · 2020
Automatically assessing lexical sophistication: Indices, tools, findings, and application
10.1002/tesq.194 · 2014
Assessing syntactic sophistication in L2 writing: A usage-based approach
10.1177/0265532217712554 · 2017
Measuring syntactic complexity in L2 writing using fine-grained clausal and phrasal indices
10.1111/modl.12468 · 2018
The tool for the automatic analysis of lexical sophistication (TAALES): Version 2.0
10.3758/s13428-017-0924-4 · 2018
Assessing the validity of lexical diversity indices using direct judgements
10.1080/15434303.2020.1844205 · 2021
Automated essay scoring: A review of the field
2021
The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data
10.2307/2529310 · 1977
Natural language generation using deep learning to support MOOC learners
10.1007/s40593-020-00235-x · 2021
Rethinking the role of automated writing evaluation (AWE) feedback in ESL writing instruction
10.1016/j.jslw.2014.10.004 · 2015
The role of automated writing evaluation holistic scores in the ESL classroom
10.1016/j.system.2014.02.007 · 2014
Automatic analysis of syntactic complexity in second language writing
10.1075/ijcl.15.4.02lu · 2010
The relationship of lexical richness to the quality of ESL learners’ oral narratives
10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01232_1.x · 2012
Sense-aware lexical sophistication indices and their relationship to second language writing quality
10.3758/s13428-021-01675-6 · 2022
Investigating minimum text lengths for lexical diversity indices
10.1016/j.asw.2020.100505 · doi-reference
Automated writing evaluation: Defining the classroom research agenda
10.1191/1362168806lr190oa · doi-reference
Rank-normalization, folding, and localization: An improved Ȓ for assessing convergence of MCMC (with discussion)
10.1214/20-ba1221 · doi-reference
Practical Bayesian model evaluation using leave-one-out cross-validation and WAIC
10.1007/s11222-016-9696-4 · doi-reference
The effects of computer-generated feedback on the quality of writing
10.1016/j.asw.2013.11.007 · doi-reference
The possibility of improving automated calculation of measures of lexical richness for EFL writing: A comparison of the LCA, NLTK and SpaCy tools
10.1016/j.system.2022.102770 · doi-reference
Machine translation systems and quality assessment: A systematic review
10.1007/s10579-021-09537-5 · doi-reference
Online strategy instruction for integrating dictionary skills and language awareness
10.64152/10125/44325 · doi-reference
An automated essay scoring systems: A systematic literature review
10.1007/s10462-021-10068-2 · doi-reference
How big is “big”? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research
10.1111/lang.12079 · doi-reference
Collaborating with ChatGPT: Considering the implications of generative artificial intelligence for journalism and media education
10.1177/10776958221149577 · doi-reference
Improving L2 learners’ IELTS task 2 writing: The role of model essays and noticing hypothesis
10.1186/s40468-022-00206-0 · doi-reference
Calculating the relative importance of multiple regression predictor variables using dominance analysis and random forests
10.1111/lang.12518 · doi-reference
A statistical model for the analysis of ordinal level dependent variables
10.1080/0022250x.1975.9989847 · doi-reference
MTLD, vocd-D, and HD-D: A validation study of sophisticated approaches to lexical diversity assessment
10.3758/brm.42.2.381 · doi-reference
Prompt text classifications with transformer models! An exemplary introduction to prompt-based learning with large language models
10.1080/15391523.2022.2142872 · doi-reference
More efficient processes for creating automated essay scoring frameworks: A demonstration of two algorithms
10.1177/0265532220937830 · doi-reference