Abstract
Nick Fitzpatrick, Livia Fritz, Benjamin Sovacool
Abstract
Authors
Institutions
Provenance
crossref
Confidence 100%
No local reference links have been materialized yet.
No local citing links have been materialized yet.
Mitigation pathways compatible with long-term goals (chapter 3)
2022
Over-reliance on land for carbon dioxide removal in net-zero climate pledges
10.1038/s41467-024-53466-0 · 2024
Climate change 2023: synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II
2023
Unresolved referenced work
2024
Negative emissions—Part 2: costs, potentials and side effects
10.1088/1748-9326/aabf9f · 2018
“Fixing” climate change by mortgaging the future: negative emissions, spatiotemporal fixes, and the political economy of delay
10.1111/anti.12532 · 2019
Unresolved referenced work
2025
Carbon dioxide removal policy in the making: assessing developments in 9 OECD cases
10.3389/fclim.2021.638805 · 2021
Taking stock of carbon dioxide removal policy in emerging economies: developments in Brazil, China, and India
10.1080/14693062.2024.2353148 · 2024
A spatial overview of the global importance of Indigenous lands for conservation
10.1038/s41893-018-0100-6 · 2018
openalex
Confidence 95%
datacite
Confidence 0%
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Long-term national climate strategies bet on forests and soils to reach net-zero
10.1038/s43247-022-00636-x · 2022
An inter-model assessment of the role of direct air capture in deep mitigation pathways
10.1038/s41467-019-10842-5 · 2019
Clarifying what is meant by greenhouse gas ‘removals’ and categorising types of ‘removal-related activities’
2026
Governance of carbon dioxide removal: an AI-enhanced systematic map of the scientific literature
10.3389/fclim.2024.1425971 · 2024
Scientific literature on carbon dioxide removal revealed as much larger through AI-enhanced systematic mapping
10.1038/s41467-025-61485-8 · 2025
Rising to the challenge: funding CDR research, development & innovation for a net zero competitive EU
2025
Negative emissions—Part 1: research landscape and synthesis
10.1088/1748-9326/aabf9b · 2018
Governing carbon dioxide removal in the UK: lessons learned and challenges ahead
10.3389/fclim.2021.673859 · 2021
Incentivizing BECCS—A Swedish case study
10.3389/fclim.2021.685227 · 2021
Integrating carbon dioxide removal into European emissions trading
10.3389/fclim.2021.690023 · 2021
Fairness and feasibility in deep mitigation pathways with novel carbon dioxide removal considering institutional capacity to mitigate
10.1088/1748-9326/acd8d5 · 2023
The distortionary effects of unconstrained for-profit carbon dioxide removal and the need for early governance intervention
2023
Making the climate malleable? “Weak” and “Strong” governance objects and the transformation of international climate politics
10.1093/isagsq/ksae062 · 2024
Effective control mechanisms of research on climate engineering techniques for the public good—The London protocol regulatory approach as a role model
10.3389/fclim.2024.1474993 · 2024
The intangible technological innovation system: the role and influence of voluntary and compliance carbon markets on carbon dioxide removal in the European Union
10.1016/j.erss.2024.103851 · 2025
Resistance to market interventionism: an analysis of the European industrial carbon management strategy consultation
10.1080/14693062.2024.2398163 · 2025
Grappling with a sea change: tensions in expert imaginaries of marine carbon dioxide removal
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2024.102806 · 2024
Contestation in social acceptance of direct air capture (DAC) technologies in Korea by differing framings over governance principles
2024
Actors, legitimacy, and governance challenges facing negative emissions and solar geoengineering technologies
10.1080/09644016.2023.2210464 · 2024
Motivations and challenges for carbon dioxide removal development: empirical evidence from market practitioners
10.1088/1748-9326/adcad4 · 2025
Between inflated expectations and inherent distrust: how publics see the role of experts in governing climate intervention technologies
10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104005 · 2025
Who cares about carbon dioxide removal? Assessing actors, policy positions, and participation modes within European and United Nations public consultation processes
2025
Drivers and attitudes of public support for technological solutions to climate change in 30 countries
10.1088/1748-9326/ad7c67 · 2024
Public attitudes and emotions toward novel carbon removal methods in alternative sociotechnical scenarios
10.1088/1748-9326/ad5dd0 · 2024
Climate beliefs, climate technologies and transformation pathways: contextualizing public perceptions in 22 countries
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2024.102880 · 2024
Public engagement for inclusive and sustainable governance of climate interventions
10.1038/s41467-024-48510-y · 2024
Public perceptions on carbon removal from focus groups in 22 countries
10.1038/s41467-024-47853-w · 2024
Carbon dioxide removal through ecosystem restoration: public perceptions and political participation
10.1007/s13280-024-02063-y · 2025
Carbon farming: are soil carbon certificates a suitable tool for climate change mitigation?
10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.117142 · 2023
Unequal exchange of labour in the world economy
10.1038/s41467-024-49687-y · doi-reference
The economics of carbon dioxide removal
10.1146/annurev-resource-010224-094505 · doi-reference
Governing carbon dioxide removal
10.3389/fclim.2021.816346 · doi-reference
The public use of early-stage scientific advances in carbon dioxide removal: a science-technology-policy-media perspective
10.1088/1748-9326/ad7479 · doi-reference
The technological and economic prospects for CO2 utilization and removal
10.1038/s41586-019-1681-6 · doi-reference
Negative emissions—Part 3: innovation and upscaling
10.1088/1748-9326/aabff4 · doi-reference
Controversies of carbon dioxide removal
10.1038/s43017-023-00493-y · doi-reference
Three decades of climate mitigation: why haven't we bent the global emissions curve?
10.1146/annurev-environ-012220-011104 · doi-reference
The trouble with negative emissions
10.1126/science.aah4567 · doi-reference
Incumbent firms in sustainability transitions–different conceptions, heterogeneous roles and ideal types
10.1016/j.eist.2025.101010 · doi-reference
Incumbency, trust and the Monsanto effect: stakeholder discourses on greenhouse gas removal
10.3197/096327119x15678473650947 · doi-reference
A progressive framework for green industrial policy
10.1080/13563467.2025.2506655 · doi-reference
Asymmetry in the climate–carbon cycle response to positive and negative CO2 emissions
10.1038/s41558-021-01061-2 · doi-reference
Little big: sizing up the risk of mitigation deterrence from carbon removal
10.1007/s10584-025-03984-7 · doi-reference
Carbon dioxide removal: a source of ambition or of delays? Examining expectations for CDR in Swiss climate policy
10.1016/j.envsci.2023.103659 · doi-reference
How incumbent cultural and cognitive path dependencies constrain the ‘scenario cone’: reliance on carbon dioxide removal due to techno-bias
10.5547/2160-5890.9.1.ibra · doi-reference
Beyond ‘doing both’—framing carbon removal carefully
10.3389/fclim.2026.1744296 · doi-reference
Global patterns of ecologically unequal exchange: implications for sustainability in the 21st century
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106824 · doi-reference
Climate fraud and carbon colonialism: the new trade in greenhouse gases
10.1080/1045575042000287299 · doi-reference
Peatland restoration in Norway–evaluation of ongoing monitoring and identification of plant indicators of restoration success
10.1111/njb.03988 · doi-reference
Forest ecosystem services in Norway: trends, condition, and drivers of change (1950–2020)
10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101491 · doi-reference
The role and deployment timing of direct air capture in Saudi Arabia's net-zero transition
10.1088/1748-9326/ad4a8f · doi-reference
Climate strategies for oil and gas production under the lens of an integrated assessment model: the case of Brazil
10.1016/j.ijggc.2024.104231 · doi-reference
The path to 2060: saudi Arabia's long-term pathway for GHG emission reduction
10.1016/j.esr.2024.101537 · doi-reference
A good life for all within planetary boundaries
10.1038/s41893-018-0021-4 · doi-reference
Biochar from agricultural wastes: environmental sustainability, economic viability and the potential as a negative emissions technology in Malaysia
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170266 · doi-reference
Amazonia as a carbon source linked to deforestation and climate change
10.1038/s41586-021-03629-6 · doi-reference
The social shortfall and ecological overshoot of nations
10.1038/s41893-021-00799-z · doi-reference
A prudent planetary limit for geologic carbon storage
10.1038/s41586-025-09423-y · doi-reference
Building Eora: a global multi-region input–output database at high country and sector resolution
10.1080/09535314.2013.769938 · doi-reference
Energy cultures and national decarbonisation pathways
10.1016/j.rser.2020.110592 · doi-reference
The political economy of national climate policy: architectures of constraint and a typology of countries
10.1016/j.erss.2020.101429 · doi-reference
A factor of two: how the mitigation plans of ‘climate progressive’ nations fall far short of Paris-compliant pathways
10.1080/14693062.2020.1728209 · doi-reference
Carbon removal as carbon revival? Bioenergy, negative emissions, and the politics of alternative energy futures
10.3389/fclim.2021.678031 · doi-reference
The international politics of carbon dioxide removal: pathways to cooperative global governance
10.1162/glep_a_00643 · doi-reference
Undoing equivalence: rethinking carbon accounting for just carbon removal
10.3389/fclim.2021.664130 · doi-reference
Quantifying national responsibility for climate breakdown: an equality-based attribution approach for carbon dioxide emissions in excess of the planetary boundary
10.1016/s2542-5196(20)30196-0 · doi-reference
Imperialist appropriation in the world economy: drain from the global South through unequal exchange, 1990–2015
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102467 · doi-reference
Mining the air: political ecologies of the circular carbon economy
10.1177/25148486211061452 · doi-reference
Seize the means of carbon removal: the political economy of direct air capture
10.1163/1569206x-29012021 · doi-reference