Neighborhood sustainability assessment tools: Research trends and forecast for the built environment

Ayotunde Dawodu; Jumoke Mojisola Oladejo

doi:10.1016/j.sftr.2022.100064

Neighborhood sustainability assessment tools: Research trends and forecast for the built environment | ResearchHub

Abstract

Rapid urbanization, environmental concerns and demand for sustainable cities contributed to the development of Neighbourhood Sustainability Assessment Tools (NSATs) such as LEED-ND and BREEAM-Communities. Whilst their success in increasing sustainability outcomes within the built environment is evident, there are unnoticed gaps in NSAT frameworks that might hinder their future suitability for sustainable urban planning and design. Therefore, to remain pertinent, NSATs must address the constantly evolving sustainability issues. To determine the gaps in NSATs frameworks and identify trends in sustainable communities, this study utilised a bibliometric exploration of NSAT-related publications. A total of 117 research articles over the last decade were reviewed to inform and provide insights on the research and development needs as well as areas of enhancing NSATs efficacy. The results revealed that research methods used to evaluate NSATs in journal articles are predominantly qualitative. This significantly limits the precision of research outcomes and highlights the need to increase quantitative (experiential and experimental) performance-based investigations which provide context and practically relevant outcomes. Furthermore, an upsurge in research themes related to big data and climate change, focused on smartness and resilience, was revealed. This indicates the suitability of NSATs for addressing existing societal concerns.To build on this achievement, tools may need to incorporate more health-based dynamics while considering issues of climate justice in order to remain effective and relevant. Another observation is the low research contribution from developing regions and lack of research from African regions. The observations and recommendations given in this study are pertinent to various stakeholders, including developers, and industry experts and consider the role of researchers in enhancing the performance of NSATs.

Open public full text

Rights: ALLOWED · cc-by · Source: journal-auto-sync:external:CROSSREF_ISSN

External reference records

10.1080/09613218.2019.1627179

Comprehensive assessment method for sustainable urban development (CAMSUD) - a new multi-criteria system for planning, evaluation and decision-making

2019

A critical review of environmental assessment tools for sustainable urban design

2015

The criticality of growth, urbanization, electricity and fossil fuel consumption to environment sustainability in Africa

10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136376 · 2020

The idea of weak sustainability is illegitimate

10.1007/s10668-016-9878-4 · 2018

Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed research methods in engineering education

10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01005.x · 2009

Unresolved referenced work

2018

Inclusion of social indicators in decision support tools for the selection of sustainable site remediation options

10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.07.035 · 2016

Sustainable urban development in the age of climate change: People: The cure or curse

2018

An introduction to neighborhood sustainability assessment tool (NSAT) study for China from comprehensive analysis of eight asian tools

2020

Developing sustainable neighbourhoods

10.1016/j.habitatint.2007.06.007 · 2008

Sustainability science: toward a synthesis

10.1146/annurev-environ-012420-043621 · 2020

Qualitative research methods overview

2011

Slum health: arresting COVID-19 and improving well-being in urban informal settlements

10.1007/s11524-020-00438-6 · 2020

10.1007/s11069-015-1993-2

Comparative study of city-level sustainability assessment standards in China and the United States

2020

A conceptual re-visualization of the adoption and utilization of the pillars of sustainability in the development of neighbourhood sustainability assessment tools

10.1016/j.scs.2016.11.001 · 2017

10.1080/09613218.2020.1806701

Expert-initiated integrated approach to the development of sustainability indicators for neighbourhood sustainability assessment tools: an African perspective

10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117759 · 2019

Expert-initiated integrated approach to the development of sustainability indicators for neighbourhood sustainability assessment tools: an African perspective

10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117759 · 2019

The illusion of participation: Are participatory indicators truly effective in neigborhood sustainability assessment tools

10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127538 · 2021

Eco-development in China

2018

Assessment of sustainable neighbourhoods: From standards to cultural practices

10.2495/sdp-v12-n3-368-378 · 2017

10.1007/s12273-018-0463-7

Form-based codes for downtown redevelopment: insights from Southern California

10.1177/0739456x17692653 · 2018

Zoning reform for advancing sustainability: insights from Denver's form-based code

10.1080/13574809.2017.1337495 · 2017

Sustainable transportation according to certification systems: a viability analysis based on neighborhood size and context relevance

10.1016/j.eiar.2016.10.005 · 2017

Reconciling “weak” and “strong” sustainability

10.1108/03068299910245859 · 1999

Urban sustainability assessment tools: a review

10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.009 · 2019

10.1016/j.scs.2015.05.004

Selection of sustainability indicators for planning: combining stakeholders’ participation and data reduction techniques

10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.01.005 · 2015

The future of sustainability science: a solutions-oriented research agenda

10.1007/s11625-013-0224-6 · 2014

Local sustainability indicators in Portugal: assessing implementation and use in governance contexts

10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.002 · 2015

Readiness for sustainable community: a case study of green star communities

10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.190 · 2018

Integration of BREEAM-NOR in construction projects: utilizing the last planner system

10.1016/j.egypro.2016.09.110 · 2016

Energy and sustainable development in Nigeria: the way forward

10.1186/2192-0567-2-15 · 2012

Do green neighbourhood ratings cover sustainability?

10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.09.005 · 2015

BACnet® for net zero

2008

Neighborhood sustainability assessment tools: a review of success factors

10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125912 · 2021

A critical review of selected tools for assessing community resilience

10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.05.023 · 2016

Additional external references

Neighborhood sustainability assessment tools and a comparative analysis of five different assessment tools

10.14744/planlama.2016.05914 · doi-reference

Comparison of sustainable community rating tools in Australia

10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.016 · doi-reference

Certification systems for sustainable neighbourhoods: what do they really certify?

10.1016/j.eiar.2015.10.003 · doi-reference

Sustainable neighborhoods in Brazil: a comparison of concepts and applications

10.1007/s10668-019-00439-9 · doi-reference

Green neighbourhood: Review on the international assessment systems

10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.083 · doi-reference

Lessons for LEED® for neighborhood development, social equity, and affordable housing

10.1080/01944363.2015.1110709 · doi-reference

Neighborhood design, connectivity assessment and obstruction

10.1057/udi.2011.14 · doi-reference

Towards indicators for institutional sustainability: Lessons from an analysis of Agenda 21

10.1016/s1470-160x(02)00050-x · doi-reference

Tourism and COVID-19: Impacts and implications for advancing and resetting industry and research

10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.06.015 · doi-reference

On the suitability of assessment tools for guiding communities towards disaster resilience

10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.06.006 · doi-reference

Neighborhood sustainability assessment tools: Research trends and forecast for the built environment

Read manuscript

Read manuscript

Referenced works

Cited by

Read manuscript

External reference records

Additional external references