Abstract
No public abstract is available from the verified source records.
Tuğba Songül Tat, Seda Altıner
Abstract
Authors
Institutions
No ROR-resolved institution is linked to this work yet.
Provenance
crossref
Confidence 100%
openalex
Confidence 95%
datacite
Confidence 0%
No local reference links have been materialized yet.
No local citing links have been materialized yet.
Drug allergy
10.1186/s13223-018-0289-y · 2018
Epidemiology of hypersensitivity drug reactions
10.1097/01.all.0000173785.81024.33 · 2005
Frequency of self-reported drug allergy
10.1016/j.anai.2017.07.009 · 2017
Identifying the most at-risk age-group and longitudinal trends of drug allergy labeling amongst 7.3 million individuals in Hong Kong
10.1186/s12916-024-03250-0 · 2024
Drug-Related hypersensitivity reactions leading to emergency department: original data and systematic review
10.3390/jcm11102811 · 2022
Endotypes in immune mediated drug reactions: present and future of relevant biomarkers. An EAACI task Force report
10.1111/all.16576 · 2025
How accurate are ChatGPT-4 responses in chronic urticaria? A critical analysis with information quality metrics
10.1016/j.waojou.2025.101071 · 2025
Evaluating large language models for WAO/EAACI guideline compliance in hereditary angioedema management
10.15586/aei.v53i4.1353 · 2025
Evaluating chatgpt's performance in answering questions about allergic rhinitis and chronic rhinosinusitis
10.1002/ohn.832 · 2024
Artificial intelligence-based ChatGPT chatbot responses for patient and parent questions on vernal keratoconjunctivitis
10.1007/s00417-023-06078-1 · 2023
In ChatGpt we trust? Assessment of atopic dermatitis information presented by artificial intelligence versusu guidelines
10.1016/j.anai.2024.08.320 · 2024
Evaluating the scientific reliability of ChatGPT as a source of information on asthma
2024
Consulting the digital doctor: Google versus ChatGPT as sources of information on breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma and breast implant illness
10.1007/s00266-023-03713-4 · 2024
Examining the effectiveness of ChatGPT responses to frequently asked questions by individuals with postural disorders
10.1590/1806-9282.20250750 · 1992
ChatGPT can provide satisfactory answers to patient questions regarding biceps tenodesis
10.1016/j.jseint.2025.04.013 · 2025
A framework for human evaluation of large language models in healthcare derived from literature review
10.1038/s41746-024-01258-7 · 2024
Critical values for Lawshe's content validity ratio: revisiting the original methods of calculation
10.1177/0748175613513808 · 2014
Ölçek geliştirme çalışmalarında kapsam geçerliği için kapsam geçerlik indekslerinin kullanılması
2005
Scoring rubric development: validity and reliability
2000
ChatGPT's potential to support home care for patients in the early period after orthopedic interventions and enhance public health
10.52312/jdrs.2023.1402 · 2023
Assessing the role of large language models in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis care: a comparison between ChatGPT and Google Gemini
10.5152/j.aott.2025.25279 · 2025
Testing and evaluation of health care applications of large Language models: a systematic review
10.1001/jama.2024.21700 · 2025
Large Language models in healthcare and medical domain: a review
10.3390/informatics11030057 · 2024
ChatGPT performance on 120 interdisciplinary allergology Questions—Systematic evaluation with clinical error impact assessment for critical erroneous AI-Guided chatbot advice
10.1016/j.jaip.2025.03.030 · 2025
Artificial intelligence and allergic rhinitis: does ChatGPT increase or impair the knowledge?
10.1093/pubmed/fdad219 · 2024
ChatGPT's performance in dentistry and allergyimmunology assessments: a comparative study
10.61872/sdj-2024-06-01 · 2023
Letter to the Editor concerning “Evaluating ChatGPT-4.0's accuracy and potential in idiopathic scoliosis conservative treatment: a preliminary study on clarity, validity, and expert perceptions” by negrini F, et al.
10.1007/s00586-025-09347-1 · 2025
No additional external references are available.