Cytomegalovirus infection and cardiac allograft vasculopathy

Abstract: There is a wealth of clinical and experimental evidence indicating the interaction of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and rejection in cardiac and other solid organ allografts. A plausible explanation for this association comes from data showing that therapy with biologicals, sepsis, and rejection, all lead to the release of TNF‐α which, upon binding to its receptor, activates NF‐kB. TNF‐α is also able to stimulate the activity of the CMV‐IE enhancer/promoter region. CMV infection of several cell lines leads to NF‐kB activation. NF‐kB binding sites are present in regulatory regions of various cellular and viral genes, including the IE enhancer region of CMV. In a reciprocal situation, CMV infection, most likely via γ‐interferon, leads to upregulation of MHC antigens in the transplant and, thereby, to increased transplant immunogenicity. Thus, a vicious circle is induced. We have investigated in detail the pathobiology of CMV and allograft vasculopathy (chronic rejection) in experimental animals, using aortic and cardiac allografts as well as a trachea model. The results may be summarized as follows: Infection of the recipient with rat CMV results in an early inflammatory response in the aortic and cardiac allograft vascular adventitia and intima (endothelialitis) and in the airway wall of tracheal allografts. This early inflammatory response leads to enhanced intimal thickness in aortic and cardiac allografts and enhanced luminal occlusion of tracheal allografts. Timewise, this coincides with early activation of intragraft inflammatory leukocytes and increased mRNA of various growth factors and cytokines. When the recipients receive gancyclovir, the enhanced intimal response in aortic and cardiac allografts and luminal occlusion in tracheal allografts is entirely abolished. Gancyclovir treatment dramatically reduces the inflammatory response in the allograft, and thereby growth factor synthesis in response to injury. However, gancyclovir does not prevent the expression of IE antigen of CMV, suggested to inactivate tumor suppressor protein p53 predisposing smooth muscle cells to increased growth. Taken together, the effect of CMV infection on cardiac allograft dysfunction is bidirectional and biphasic. The bidirectional nature emerges from the observations that acute CMV infection may accelerate acute rejection, and, on the other hand, acute alloimmune response‐associated cytokine response may activate latent CMV infection. The biphasic effect of CMV on allograft dysfunction refers to its early and late detrimental effects, i.e. during the time of acute and chronic rejection. These two effects of CMV on allograft dysfunction emphasize the need for precise diagnosis of CMV infection in transplant recipients and pre‐emptive or prophylactic anti‐viral therapy. The benefits of this strategy may not be evident during the early post‐transplant period, but 5–10 years after transplantation they manifest as better graft survival Note.