Translation of the shortened dental arch research into clinical practice: a stakeholder mapping approach

Abstract Aim To identify key participants that can ensure implementation of the SDA or PRDA as a prosthodontic management option using a stakeholder mapping approach. Methods A stakeholder mapping approach is employed which is a strategic method to identify, rate the importance of input and the influence, highlighting how clinical implementation can be ensured. A stakeholder map was used as the research tool. Stakeholders were classified according to their level of influence in either assisting with change or obstructing progress as well as the impact of their input within the dental organization and the broader South African environment. Results Several stakeholders were identified and were classified in two ways: Primary or secondary and according to their affiliation with the organization where change needs to occur. Initially, a lecture on the shortened dental arch was included in 4th year of undergraduate study, after consultation with the head of the department. This was abandoned as students misunderstood the use of the concept related to clinical requirements; thus, the location of where this concept must be taught, was reconsidered. The role of other key stakeholders that could effect change was also highlighted with this approach. Conclusion This strategic analysis allowed identification of key stakeholders and their roles that can assist with implementation of the SDA or PRDA, some of whom should be addressed further to ensure alignment of practices to health policies. Key points Knowledge translation consists of multiple stages from design to implementation which includes diffusion, dissemination (such as publishing) and implementation of evidence into clinical practice (application of concepts or procedures to improve patient care). Only quality research, as stipulated on the evidence pyramid, can be used to change curricula and clinical practices. The strategic approach with stakeholder mapping allows identification of key stakeholders in prosthodontics (knowledge brokers or communities of practice) that have the interest and influence to change curricula and clinical practice; including a combined approach with researchers which may enable easier application of quality care to patients.