Abstract
E. Keith Smith, Thomas Bernauer
Abstract
Authors
Institutions
Provenance
crossref
Confidence 100%
openalex
Confidence 95%
doaj
Confidence 92%
datacite
Confidence 0%
No local reference links have been materialized yet.
No local citing links have been materialized yet.
Food waste index report 2024. Think Eat Save: Tracking Progress to Halve Global Food Waste
2024
Survey research in environmental politics: why it is important and what the challenges are
10.1080/09644016.2020.1789337 · 2020
Policy framing, design and feedback can increase public support for costly food waste regulation
10.1038/s43016-022-00460-8 · 2022
What explains public support for climate policies? A review of empirical and experimental studies
10.1080/14693062.2015.1058240 · 2016
Could revenue recycling make effective carbon taxation politically feasible?
10.1126/sciadv.aax3323 · 2019
Policy packaging can make food system transformation feasible
10.1038/s43016-020-0047-4 · 2020
Public support for carbon pricing policies and revenue recycling options: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the survey literature
10.1038/s44168-024-00153-x · 2024
How to design publicly acceptable road pricing? Experimental insights from Switzerland
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.108102 · 2024
Policy mixes for sustainable development pathways: representation in integrated assessment models
10.1088/1748-9326/ad993a · 2025
Policy feedback effects on mass publics: a quantitative review
10.1111/psj.12280 · 2019
Does private regulation preempt public regulation?
10.1017/s0003055418000679 · 2019
Voluntary business initiatives can reduce public pressure for regulating firm behaviour abroad
10.1080/13501763.2020.1751244 · 2021
Convincing conservatives: private sector action can bolster support for climate change mitigation in the United States
10.1016/j.erss.2021.101947 · 2021
Cross-national public acceptance of sustainable global supply chain policy instruments
10.1038/s41893-022-00984-8 · 2023
Voter perceptions and the politics of hidden costs in unilateral sustainable supply chain regulations
10.1017/s1475676525100212 · 2025
The means and end of greenwash
10.1177/1086026615575332 · 2015
Greenwashing and public demand for government regulation
10.1017/s0143814x22000277 · 2023
‘Bluewashing’ the Firm? Voluntary regulations, program design and member compliance with the United Nations Global Compact
10.1111/psj.12085 · 2015
Unresolved referenced work
2006
Process sequencing policy dynamics: beyond homeostasis and path dependency
10.1017/s0143814x09990158 · 2009
The role of policy design in policy continuation and ratcheting-up of policy ambition
10.1093/polsoc/puad027 · 2023
An experimental test of the crowding out hypothesis: the nature of beneficent behavior
10.1016/s0167-2681(98)00091-2 · 1998
An experimental test of the crowding out hypothesis
10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.05.012 · 2005
Policy sequencing can increase public support for ambitious climate policy
10.1093/polsoc/puad030 · 2023
Unresolved referenced work
1992
Unresolved referenced work
2023
How to encourage pro-environmental behaviors without crowding out public support for climate policies
10.1177/237946152100700209 · 2021
Food waste and loss
2024
Swiss adopt nationwide food waste reduction plan
2022
National pathway for food systems transformation in support of the 2030 Agenda: Switzerland
2021
Schweizer umweltpanel. zwölfte erhebungswelle: lebensmittelverluste in der schweiz. Befragungszeitraum: November 2023 - Februar 2024
2025
A word on standardization in longitudinal studies: don’t
10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01389 · 2015
Nudging out support for a carbon tax
10.1038/s41558-019-0474-0 · 2019
The evidence for motivated reasoning in climate change preference formation
10.1038/s41558-018-0360-1 · 2019
Replication material for paper “Smith and Bernauer. (2026): Do Voluntary Industry Measures Shift Support for Stronger Environmental Governance”
10.5281/zenodo.22875474 · 2026
Replication material for paper “Smith and Bernauer. (2026): Do Voluntary Industry Measures Shift Support for Stronger Environmental Governance”
10.5281/zenodo.22875474 · doi-reference
The evidence for motivated reasoning in climate change preference formation
10.1038/s41558-018-0360-1 · doi-reference
Nudging out support for a carbon tax
10.1038/s41558-019-0474-0 · doi-reference
A word on standardization in longitudinal studies: don’t
10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01389 · doi-reference
How to encourage pro-environmental behaviors without crowding out public support for climate policies
10.1177/237946152100700209 · doi-reference
Policy sequencing can increase public support for ambitious climate policy
10.1093/polsoc/puad030 · doi-reference
An experimental test of the crowding out hypothesis
10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.05.012 · doi-reference
An experimental test of the crowding out hypothesis: the nature of beneficent behavior
10.1016/s0167-2681(98)00091-2 · doi-reference
The role of policy design in policy continuation and ratcheting-up of policy ambition
10.1093/polsoc/puad027 · doi-reference
Process sequencing policy dynamics: beyond homeostasis and path dependency
10.1017/s0143814x09990158 · doi-reference
‘Bluewashing’ the Firm? Voluntary regulations, program design and member compliance with the United Nations Global Compact
10.1111/psj.12085 · doi-reference
Greenwashing and public demand for government regulation
10.1017/s0143814x22000277 · doi-reference
The means and end of greenwash
10.1177/1086026615575332 · doi-reference
Voter perceptions and the politics of hidden costs in unilateral sustainable supply chain regulations
10.1017/s1475676525100212 · doi-reference
Cross-national public acceptance of sustainable global supply chain policy instruments
10.1038/s41893-022-00984-8 · doi-reference
Convincing conservatives: private sector action can bolster support for climate change mitigation in the United States
10.1016/j.erss.2021.101947 · doi-reference
Voluntary business initiatives can reduce public pressure for regulating firm behaviour abroad
10.1080/13501763.2020.1751244 · doi-reference
Does private regulation preempt public regulation?
10.1017/s0003055418000679 · doi-reference
Policy feedback effects on mass publics: a quantitative review
10.1111/psj.12280 · doi-reference
Policy mixes for sustainable development pathways: representation in integrated assessment models
10.1088/1748-9326/ad993a · doi-reference
How to design publicly acceptable road pricing? Experimental insights from Switzerland
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.108102 · doi-reference
Public support for carbon pricing policies and revenue recycling options: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the survey literature
10.1038/s44168-024-00153-x · doi-reference
Policy packaging can make food system transformation feasible
10.1038/s43016-020-0047-4 · doi-reference
Could revenue recycling make effective carbon taxation politically feasible?
10.1126/sciadv.aax3323 · doi-reference
What explains public support for climate policies? A review of empirical and experimental studies
10.1080/14693062.2015.1058240 · doi-reference
Policy framing, design and feedback can increase public support for costly food waste regulation
10.1038/s43016-022-00460-8 · doi-reference
Survey research in environmental politics: why it is important and what the challenges are
10.1080/09644016.2020.1789337 · doi-reference