Abstract
No public abstract is available from the verified source records.
Catherine Heidi Seage, Delyth Higman James
Abstract
Authors
Institutions
Provenance
crossref
Confidence 100%
pubmed
Confidence 98%
europepmc
Confidence 96%
unpaywall
Confidence 95%
openalex
Confidence 95%
No local reference links have been materialized yet.
No local citing links have been materialized yet.
Lie for a dime: when most pre-screening responses are honest but most study participants are impostors
10.1177/1948550617698203 · 2017
Detecting and preventing imposter participants: methods and recommendations for qualitative researchers
10.1177/10497323251333243 · 2025
Striking a balance: mitigating fraud while ensuring equity in online qualitative research recruitment
10.2196/68393 · 2025
Data integrity issues with web-based studies: an institutional example of a widespread challenge
10.2196/58432 · 2024
Threat of imposter participants in health research
10.1136/bmj.r2128 · 2025
Imposter participants in synchronous qualitative research: a systematic scoping review
10.1177/16094069251342542 · 2025
Behavioural insights about barriers and facilitators to returning used and expired inhalers to community pharmacies in Wales: a qualitative study
10.1093/ijpp/riaf037 · 2025
Mitigating the risk of imposter participants in qualitative research: evidence-based guidance for researchers and organisations
10.1080/14780887.2026.2661612 · 2026
Data or deception: imposter participants in online qualitative research
datacite
Confidence 0%
10.1177/10497323261417232 · 2026
'Imposter participants' in online qualitative research, a new and increasing threat to data integrity?
10.1111/hex.13724 · 2023
No additional external references are available.