Sustainability indicators for gastrointestinal endoscopy: a framework proposed by the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology and the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Ripple effect: safety, cost, and environmental concerns of using sterile water in endoscopy

10.1016/j.gastha.2025.100625 · doi-reference

Impact of power consumption and power saving for GI endoscopy (power on study) on reducing CO(2) emissions

10.1136/gutjnl-2023-331867 · doi-reference

Economic efficiency of implementation of lighting control in public buildings

10.33383/2021-026 · doi-reference

A low cost, highly scalable wireless sensor network solution to achieve smart LED light control for green buildings

10.1109/jsen.2014.2383996 · doi-reference

Energy consumption analysis and characterization of healthcare facilities in the United States

10.3390/en12193775 · doi-reference

Telemedicine for management of inflammatory bowel disease (myIBDcoach): a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial

10.1016/s0140-6736(17)31327-2 · doi-reference

Sustainable practice in gastroenterology: travel-related CO2 emissions for gastroenterology clinic appointments in Canada

10.1093/jcag/gwae049 · doi-reference

Association of virtual care expansion with environmental sustainability and reduced patient costs during the COVID-19 pandemic in Ontario, Canada

10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.37545 · doi-reference

TU 1001. The environmental benefits of telemedicine consult: an assessment of carbon emission saved

10.1016/s0016-5085(24)03245-1 · doi-reference

Targeted intervention to achieve waste reduction in gastrointestinal endoscopy

10.1136/gutjnl-2022-327005 · doi-reference

The carbon footprint of waste streams in a UK hospital

10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125446 · doi-reference

Healthcare waste-a serious problem for global health

10.3390/healthcare11020242 · doi-reference

Practical steps to green your endoscopy unit: appropriate management of endoscopic waste

10.1016/j.gie.2024.06.031 · doi-reference

Microplastics and nanoplastics in atheromas and cardiovascular events

10.1056/nejmoa2309822 · doi-reference

Analysis of microplastics in human feces reveals a correlation between fecal microplastics and inflammatory bowel disease status

10.1021/acs.est.1c03924 · doi-reference

Plastics and health risks

10.1146/annurev.publhealth.012809.103714 · doi-reference

Environmentally sustainable gastroenterology practice: review of current state and future goals

10.1111/den.14688 · doi-reference

Environmental impact of endoscopy: “scope” of the problem

10.14309/ajg.0000000000001005 · doi-reference

Costs associated with the management of waste from healthcare facilities: an analysis at national and site level

10.1177/0734242x17739968 · doi-reference

Transforming gastroenterology care with telemedicine

10.1053/j.gastro.2017.01.048 · doi-reference

Endoscopy’s current carbon footprint

10.1016/j.tige.2021.06.005 · doi-reference

Estimating the environmental impact of endoscopic activity at a tertiary center: a pilot study

10.1097/meg.0000000000002667 · doi-reference

Environmental footprint and material composition comparison of single-use and reusable duodenoscopes

10.1055/a-2364-1654 · doi-reference

Environmental and health outcomes of single-use versus reusable duodenoscopes

10.1016/j.gie.2022.06.014 · doi-reference

Environmental considerations in the selection of isolation gowns: a life cycle assessment of reusable and disposable alternatives

10.1016/j.ajic.2018.02.002 · doi-reference

Disposable versus reusable medical gowns: a performance comparison

10.1016/j.ajic.2020.10.013 · doi-reference

An environmental analysis of reusable and disposable surgical gowns

10.1002/aorn.12885 · doi-reference

The environmental footprint of single-use versus reusable cloths for clinical surface decontamination: a life cycle approach

10.1016/j.jhin.2022.09.006 · doi-reference

Sustainable purchasing practices: a comparison of single-use and reusable pulse oximeters in the emergency department

10.5811/westjem.58258 · doi-reference

Environmental and economic comparison of reusable and disposable blood pressure cuffs in multiple clinical settings

10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104643 · doi-reference

Single-use accessories and endoscopes in the era of sustainability and climate change―a balancing act

10.1111/jgh.16380 · doi-reference

Life cycle assessment and costing methods for device procurement: comparing reusable and single-use disposable laryngoscopes

10.1213/ane.0000000000002683 · doi-reference

The impact of switching from single-use to reusable healthcare products: a transparency checklist and systematic review of life-cycle assessments

10.1093/eurpub/ckac174 · doi-reference

i-CLIMATE: a “clinical climate informatics” action framework to reduce environmental pollution from healthcare

10.1093/jamia/ocac137 · doi-reference

Endoscopic electronic medical record systems

10.1016/j.gie.2015.09.036 · doi-reference

Use of electronic health records can improve the health care industry’s environmental footprint

10.1377/hlthaff.2010.1215 · doi-reference

Non-sterile examination gloves and sterile surgical gloves: which are more sustainable?

10.1016/j.jhin.2021.10.001 · doi-reference

Cold versus hot snare resection with or without submucosal injection of 6- to 15-mm colorectal polyps: a randomized controlled trial

10.1016/j.gie.2022.03.006 · doi-reference

Digestive findings that do not require endoscopic surveillance – reducing the burden of care: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement

10.1055/a-1137-4721 · doi-reference

Spotlight: US Multi-Society Task Force on colorectal cancer recommendations for endoscopic removal of colorectal lesions

10.1053/j.gastro.2020.02.015 · doi-reference