Abstract
Contact and support
Need help, have a question, or want to contact the ResearchHub team?
© 2026 ResearchHub. Built for responsible scholarly connection.
Ana S Iltis, Carmen Harrell, Haley Tyrell, Amaya Williams
Abstract
Authors
Institutions
No ROR-resolved institution is linked to this work yet.
Provenance
crossref
Confidence 100%
pubmed
Confidence 98%
europepmc
Confidence 96%
unpaywall
Confidence 95%
datacite
Confidence 0%
No local reference links have been materialized yet.
No local citing links have been materialized yet.
Why we can’t really say what post-persons are
10.1136/medethics-2011-100239 · 2012
Still afraid of needy post-persons
10.1136/medethics-2012-101095 · 2013
Why is it possible to enhance moral status and why doing so is wrong?
10.1136/medethics-2012-100597 · 2013
A question about defining moral bioenhancement
10.1136/medethics-2012-101153 · 2014
Unresolved referenced work
2014
Moral bioenhancement and the Utilitarian catastrophe
10.1017/s0963180114000280 · 2015
Moral bioenhancement is dangerous
10.1136/medethics-2013-101325 · 2015
Commentary: The implementation ethics of moral enhancement
10.1017/s0963180118000385 · 2019
Moral enhancement should target self-interest and cognitive capacity
10.1007/s12152-017-9331-x · 2017
Moral enhancement frameworks and narrative identity
2021
Human gene therapy: Why draw a line?
10.1093/jmp/14.6.681 · 1989
Moral enhancement and those left behind
10.1111/bioe.12251 · 2016
Are we obliged to enhance for moral perfection?
10.1093/jmp/jhy017 · 2018
Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework
10.1080/1364557032000119616 · 2005
Should we biochemically enhance sexual fidelity?
10.1017/s1358246118000462 · 2018
Human enhancement: A new issue in philosophical agenda
2013
The misfortunes of moral enhancement
10.1093/jmp/jhw016 · 2016
Public reason and moral bioenhancement
2014
Neuromodulation in the service of moral enhancement
10.1007/s10548-012-0273-7 · 2014
Moral enhancement, gnosticism, and some philosophical paradoxes
10.1017/s0963180114000322 · 2015
State neutrality and the ethics of human enhancement technologies
2010
Identity, virtue theory, and the death of moral enhancement
2021
Cognitive self-enhancement as a duty to oneself: A Kantian perspective
10.1111/sjp.12267 · 2018
Are we unfit for the future?
10.1136/medethics-2013-101728 · 2015
Conceptual and practical problems of moral enhancement
10.1111/bioe.12090 · 2015
Moral frankensteins
2012
Doing good, choosing freely: How moral enhancement can be compatible with individual freedom
10.1017/s096318011800018x · 2018
Moral enhancement where it would make the most difference
2021
Bioconservatism, bioenhancement and backfiring
10.1080/03057240.2019.1576125 · 2020
Two internal critiques for theists who oppose moral enhancement on a process virtue basis
10.1111/bioe.12985 · 2022
The ambivalence of moral psychology
2011
Moral enhancement and mental freedom
10.1111/japp.12108 · 2016
Moral status and human enhancement
10.1111/j.1088-4963.2009.01166.x · 2009
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199587810.001.0001
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199587810.001.0001 · 2011
Still unconvinced, but still tentative: A reply to DeGrazia
10.1136/medethics-2011-100314 · 2012
What drives public attitudes towards moral bioenhancement and why it matters: An exploratory study
10.1186/s12910-021-00732-1 · 2021
The new ethics of neuroethics
10.1017/s0963180118000087 · 2018
Can moral enhancement address our environmental crisis? A call for collective virtue-oriented action
2021
The limits of direct modulation of emotion for moral enhancement
10.1111/bioe.12800 · 2021
On cognitive and moral enhancement: A reply to Savulescu and Persson
10.1111/bioe.12076 · 2015
‘The thorny and arduous path of moral progress’: Moral psychology and moral enhancement
10.1007/s12152-012-9166-4 · doi-reference
Covert moral bioenhancement, public health, and autonomy
10.1111/bioe.12567 · doi-reference
How would we know if moral enhancement had occurred?
10.5325/jspecphil.32.4.0587 · doi-reference
Performance-enhancing technologies and moral responsibility in the military
10.1080/15265160802014969 · doi-reference
The sins of moral enhancement discourse
10.1017/s1358246118000280 · doi-reference
Would we even know moral bioenhancement if we saw it?
10.1017/s0963180116001067 · doi-reference
Moral enhancement — ‘Hard’ and ‘soft’ forms
10.1080/15265161.2014.889247 · doi-reference
Persons, post-persons, and thresholds
10.1136/medethics-2011-100243 · doi-reference
Egalitarianism and successful moral bioenhancement
10.1080/15265161.2014.889250 · doi-reference
Kantian challenges for the bioenhancement of moral autonomy
10.1017/s1358246118000322 · doi-reference
When bad people do good things: Will moral enhancement make the world a better place?
10.1136/medethics-2012-101094 · doi-reference
Devoured by our own children: The possibility and peril of moral status enhancement
10.1136/medethics-2012-100843 · doi-reference
Moral enhancement and the good life
10.1007/s11019-018-9868-4 · doi-reference
Amoral enhancement
10.1136/medethics-2015-103317 · doi-reference
Enhancing beyond what ought to be the case - A conceptual clarification
10.1111/bioe.12241 · doi-reference
Moral enhancement, instrumentalism, and integrative ethical education
10.1017/s1358246118000401 · doi-reference
Prevention and management of unprofessional behaviour among adults in the workplace: A scoping review
10.1371/journal.pone.0201187 · doi-reference
Moral enhancement and agential risks: Good and bad outcomes
10.1111/bioe.12389 · doi-reference
‘My child will never initiate Ultimate Harm’: An argument against moral enhancement
10.1136/medethics-2013-101855 · doi-reference
Good parents would not fulfil their obligation to genetically enhance their unborn children
10.1136/jme.2010.041210 · doi-reference
Moral enhancement in Russia: Lessons from the past
10.1017/s0963180117000858 · doi-reference
The experimental psychology of moral enhancement: We should if we could, but we can’t
10.1017/s1358246118000413 · doi-reference
Moral transhumanism: The next step
10.1093/jmp/jhs024 · doi-reference
‘Unnatural’ thoughts? On moral enhancement of the human animal
10.1007/s11019-017-9758-1 · doi-reference
Forensic practitioners’ views on stimulating moral development and moral growth in forensic psychiatric care
10.1007/s12152-018-9363-x · doi-reference
Public attitudes towards moral enhancement: Evidence that means matter morally
10.1007/s12152-017-9340-9 · doi-reference
Imagining moral bioenhancement practices: Drawing inspiration from moral education, public health ethics, and forensic psychiatry
10.1017/s0963180116001080 · doi-reference
The ethical desirability of moral bioenhancement: A review of reasons
10.1186/1472-6939-15-67 · doi-reference
Egalitarianism and moral bioenhancement
10.1080/15265161.2014.889241 · doi-reference
Better living through chemistry? A reply to Savulescu and Persson on ‘moral enhancement’
10.1111/japp.12038 · doi-reference
The perils of post-persons
10.1136/medethics-2012-100834 · doi-reference
From goodness to good looks: Changing images of human germline genetic modification
10.1111/bioe.12913 · doi-reference
Moral enhancement and the human condition
10.1017/s1358246118000310 · doi-reference
Bioethics and moral agency: On autonomy and moral responsibility
10.1093/jmp/jhw022 · doi-reference
Intention and moral enhancement
10.1111/bioe.12284 · doi-reference
Is moral enhancement a right, or a threat to rights?
10.1017/s135824611800036x · doi-reference
The right to bodily integrity and the rehabilitation of offenders through medical interventions: A reply to Thomas Douglas
10.1007/s12152-016-9277-4 · doi-reference
Retributivism and the moral enhancement of criminals through brain interventions
10.1017/s1358246118000383 · doi-reference
Neuroenhancing public health
10.1136/medethics-2012-101300 · doi-reference
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: Elaboration and explanation
10.1136/bmj.g7647 · doi-reference