Abstract
No public abstract is available from the verified source records.
Contact and support
Need help, have a question, or want to contact the ResearchHub team?
© 2026 ResearchHub. Built for responsible scholarly connection.
Privacy-aware community infrastructureLauren M. Boden, William Sheppard, Taylor Paziuk
Abstract
Authors
Institutions
No ROR-resolved institution is linked to this work yet.
Provenance
crossref
Confidence 100%
pubmed
Confidence 98%
unpaywall
Confidence 95%
datacite
Confidence 0%
No local reference links have been materialized yet.
No local citing links have been materialized yet.
Guideline summary review: an evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis
10.1016/j.spinee.2015.11.055 · 2016
Decompression with or without fusion in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis
10.1056/nejmoa2100990 · 2021
Decompression alone versus decompression and instrumented fusion for the treatment of isthmic spondylolisthesis: a randomized controlled trial
10.3171/2021.1.spine201958 · 2021
Addition of TLIF does not improve outcome over standard posterior instrumented fusion: 5-10 years long-term follow-up
10.1007/s00586-016-4592-3 · 2017
Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion alone in the treatment of grade 1 degenerative spondylolisthesis
10.1227/neu.0000000000002402 · 2023
A comparison of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and decompression alone for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis
10.3171/2019.2.focus18722 · 2019
Posterolateral fusion (PLF) versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
10.1016/j.spinee.2018.01.028 · 2018
Posterolateral fusion with interbody for lumbar spondylolisthesis is associated with less repeat surgery than posterolateral fusion alone
10.1016/j.clineuro.2015.08.014 · 2015
Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in lumbar spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
10.1016/j.spinee.2017.06.018 · 2017
A perioperative cost analysis comparing single-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
10.1016/j.spinee.2013.10.053 · 2014
Surgical treatments for lumbar spine diseases (TLIF vs. other surgical techniques): a systematic review and meta-analysis
10.3389/fsurg.2022.829469 · 2022
One-level lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis and posterior approach: Is transforaminal lateral interbody fusion mandatory? A randomized controlled trial with 2-year follow-up
10.1097/brs.0000000000001857 · 2017
Posterolateral lumbar arthrodesis with and without interbody arthrodesis for L4-L5 degenerative spondylolisthesis: a comparative value analysis
10.1097/brs.0000000000000856 · 2015
Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) versus posterolateral instrumented fusion (PLF) in degenerative lumbar disorders: a randomized clinical trial with 2-year follow-up
10.1007/s00586-013-2760-2 · 2013
Surgical treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: effect of TLIF and slip reduction on sagittal alignment
10.1016/j.otsr.2022.103541 · 2023
Does transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion induce lordosis or kyphosis? Radiographic evaluation with a minimum 2-year follow-up
10.3171/2020.12.spine201665 · 2021
Posterolateral versus transforaminal interbody L4/5 fusion: Correlation with subsequent surgery
10.1097/bsd.0000000000000733 · 2019
Which approach leads to more reoperations in single-level, open, posterior lumbar fusion: transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion or posterolateral fusion alone?
10.14444/8424 · 2023
No additional external references are available.