Abstract
No public abstract is available from the verified source records.
Periklis Giannakis, Jashvant Poeran, Alejandro Gonzalez Della Valle
Abstract
Authors
Institutions
No ROR-resolved institution is linked to this work yet.
Provenance
crossref
Confidence 100%
pubmed
Confidence 98%
unpaywall
Confidence 95%
datacite
Confidence 0%
No local reference links have been materialized yet.
No local citing links have been materialized yet.
Discrimination and calibration of clinical prediction models: users’ guides to the medical literature
10.1001/jama.2017.12126 · 2017
EQUATOR: reporting guidelines for health research
2008
Events per variable (EPV) and the relative performance of different strategies for estimating the out-of-sample validity of logistic regression models
10.1177/0962280214558972 · 2017
Clinical prediction models for patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty: an external validation based on a systematic review and the Dutch Arthroplasty Register
10.2340/17453674.2024.42449 · 2024
Variability in the definition and perceived causes of delayed unions and nonunions: a cross-sectional, multinational survey of orthopaedic surgeons
10.2106/jbjs.k.01344 · 2012
Methodological guidance for the evaluation and updating of clinical prediction models: a systematic review
10.1186/s12874-022-01801-8 · 2022
Standards required for the development of CDC evidence-based guidelines
10.15585/mmwr.su7101a1 · 2022
Fracture risk assessment: an update
10.2106/jbjs.20.01071 · 2021
Predictive capacity of fracture risk assessment tools: overview of systematic reviews
10.1007/s00198-025-07642-7 · 2025
A nonparametric updating method to correct clinical prediction model drift
10.1093/jamia/ocz127 · 2019
A new framework to enhance the interpretation of external validation studies of clinical prediction models
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.06.018 · 2015
Avoiding systematic bias in orthopedics research through informed variable selection: a discussion of confounders, mediators, and colliders
10.1016/j.arth.2022.05.027 · 2022
Model transparency and validation: a report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force-7
10.1177/0272989x12454579 · 2012
Model transparency and validation: a report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force--7
10.1016/j.jval.2012.04.012 · 2012
Development and validation of a Hospital Frailty Risk Score focusing on older people in acute care settings using electronic hospital records: an observational study
10.1016/s0140-6736(18)30668-8 · 2018
Can machine learning methods produce accurate and easy-to-use prediction models of 30-day complications and mortality after knee or hip arthroplasty?
10.1097/corr.0000000000000601 · 2019
Readmission, complication, and disposition calculators in total joint arthroplasty: a systemic review
10.1016/j.arth.2020.10.052 · 2021
Risk factors for secondary meniscus tears can be accurately predicted through machine learning, creating a resource for patient education and intervention
10.1007/s00167-022-07117-w · 2023
Assessing the clinical impact of risk prediction models with decision curves: guidance for correct interpretation and appropriate use
10.1200/jco.2015.65.5654 · 2016
Development and internal validation of machine learning algorithms for predicting hyponatremia after TJA
10.2106/jbjs.21.00718 · 2022
Editorial: Opposites attract at CORR®-machine learning and qualitative research
10.1097/corr.0000000000001466 · 2020
Comparison between various fracture risk assessment tools
10.1007/s00198-013-2409-3 · 2014
Development and evaluation of a risk calculator for fracture-related infection after open reduction and internal fixation: a multi-institutional study
10.1186/s12891-025-09127-4 · 2025
A machine learning algorithm to identify patients with tibial shaft fractures at risk for infection after operative treatment
10.2106/jbjs.20.00903 · 2021
Implant-positioning and patient factors associated with acromial and scapular spine fractures after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a study by the ASES Complications of RSA Multicenter Research Group
10.2106/jbjs.23.01203 · 2024
Wide range of applications for machine-learning prediction models in orthopedic surgical outcome: a systematic review
10.1080/17453674.2021.1932928 · 2021
Greater risks of complications, infections, and revisions in the obese versus non-obese total hip arthroplasty population of 2,190,824 patients: a meta-analysis and systematic review
10.1016/j.joca.2019.10.005 · 2020
Award for Best Oral Presentation 2023: Up to 8 mm of glenoid-sided lateralization does not increase the risk of acromial or scapular spine stress fracture following reverse shoulder arthroplasty with a 135° inlay humeral component
10.1016/j.jse.2023.11.018 · 2024
A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis
10.1016/s0895-4356(96)00236-3 · 1996
Trends in comorbidities and complications among patients undergoing elective total hip and knee arthroplasty in the USA
10.1111/anae.16529 · 2025
Minimum sample size for external validation of a clinical prediction model with a binary outcome
10.1002/sim.9025 · 2021
External validation of clinical prediction models: simulation-based sample size calculations were more reliable than rules-of-thumb
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.02.011 · 2021
Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: potential and pitfalls
10.1136/bmj.b2393 · 2009
Internal validation of predictive models: efficiency of some procedures for logistic regression analysis
10.1016/s0895-4356(01)00341-9 · 2001
Predicting nonroutine discharge after elective spine surgery: external validation of machine learning algorithms
10.3171/2019.5.spine1987 · 2019
How accurate are the Surgical Risk Preoperative Assessment System (SURPAS) universal calculators in total joint arthroplasty?
10.1097/corr.0000000000001078 · 2020
A nomogram to predict major complications after hip and knee arthroplasty
10.1016/j.arth.2013.09.007 · 2014
Creation of a total hip arthroplasty patient-specific dislocation risk calculator
10.2106/jbjs.21.01171 · 2022
Predicting the probability of recurrence based on individualized risk factors after primary lateral patellar dislocation treated nonoperatively
10.1016/j.arthro.2023.10.028 · 2024
No additional external references are available.