Abstract
Responds to George Tavlas’ comments in “More on the Chicago tradition”, in this issue, and once again assesses the contribution of individuals to “the Chicago tradition” of the 1930s.
Contact and support
Need help, have a question, or want to contact the ResearchHub team?
© 2026 ResearchHub. Built for responsible scholarly connection.
Privacy-aware community infrastructureDavid Laidler
Abstract
Authors
Institutions
No ROR-resolved institution is linked to this work yet.
Provenance
crossref
Confidence 100%
unpaywall
Confidence 95%
datacite
Confidence 0%
No local citing links have been materialized yet.
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
10.1086/261915
10.1086/261915
10.1108/01443589810195589
10.1108/01443589810195589
10.1215/00182702-28-4-607
10.1215/00182702-28-4-607
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
10.2307/1991527
10.2307/1991527
10.1086/262069
10.1086/262069
10.1108/01443589810368163
10.1108/01443589810368163
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
No additional external references are available.