Abstract
Co‐ordination is seen as a key element in UK disaster‐response planning,
although the term is used synonymously with co‐operation and liaison by
both the Home Office and the organizations involved. This lack of
clarity shows the ad hoc nature of both the legislation and management
practices governing the response. Argues that, as a result,
co‐ordination may be an inappropriate goal; co‐operation may be
preferable and more accessible. Highlights key elements influencing
current trends, together with practical and theoretical issues from the
move towards a simplified response. Concludes that co‐ordination by
feedback will continue to dominate because it is in accord with past
practice. This will ensure that co‐ordination is both confined to
specific functions and used as a general exhortation, even though
co‐operation may be a more accurate description of the key element in UK
disaster response.