Abstract
In disaster management, relocation/resettlement is more often seen
as the worst option as it gives the impression that nothing else can be
done about the hazard and people have to be moved. Relocation is
unpopular, as plans to relocate entire communities are costly, mainly
because of the need to acquire alternative locations and the provision
of housing for those resettled. More significantly, at least on the part
of those being relocated, it provokes social disruption and upheaval
when people are bundled into an alien environment. Notwithstanding the
influence of structural/societal forces, people are also reluctant to be
relocated far from relatives, friends and their place of work (or
schools in the case of children). Examines the effectiveness of
government‐run permanent relocation schemes as a response to flood
hazards in Malaysia.