Abstract
ABSTRACT
Aim
We aimed to evaluate an innovative dose–response approach to assess the metaboreflex with control of intramuscular metabolic perturbation (concept of metaboreflex gain). We also investigated potential sex differences in the metaboreflex using this new approach.
Methods
Thirty participants (15 females) completed one familiarization and two experimental visits to evaluate the method and assess its reproducibility. Each visit involved four consecutive bouts of sustained isometric knee extension at 20% of maximal voluntary force interspersed with 2 min of post‐exercise circulatory occlusion (PECO). Intramuscular metabolic perturbation was quantified indirectly via changes in quadriceps twitch force evoked by electrical stimulation of the femoral nerve (∆Q
TW
). Metaboreflex gain was calculated as the ratio of ∆mean arterial pressure (∆MAP) during PECO to ∆Q
TW
.
Results
We found a gradual increase in ∆MAP (
p
TW
(
p
r
2
= 0.93;
p
= 0.037). Bland–Altman analysis showed a mean bias of 0.3 ± 0.5 for metaboreflex gain. Males exhibited greater metaboreflex to PECO than females when assessed “classically” with no control of ∆Q
TW
(∆MAP; 49.1% ± 17.9% vs. 36.5% ± 8.7%;
p
= 0.020), whereas there was no sex difference when assessed using the metaboreflex gain (∆MAP/∆Q
TW
; 1.3 ± 0.6 vs. 1.8 ± 1.3;
p
= 0.325). The metaboreflex gain was not consistent across exercise bouts, showing that contrasting conclusions might emerge between two single assessments performed at different levels of metaboreflex activation.
Conclusion
This study highlights the critical need for using a dose–response relationship while accounting for neuromuscular fatigue as a proxy for the metabolic stimulus when assessing the muscle metaboreflex in humans.
Trial Registration
Clinical trials registration number: NCT06775119