CALME: A Cognitive Loop for Ethical Deliberation During Clinical Action

Nina Cadeau Comte

doi:10.1111/jep.70633

CALME: A Cognitive Loop for Ethical Deliberation During Clinical Action | ResearchHub

ABSTRACT Rationale, Aims and Objectives Most established approaches to clinical ethics support deliberation before or after care, through processes such as informed consent, institutional guidance, ethics consultation and retrospective case review. Yet ethically significant decisions often arise during clinical action, when clinicians must respond under time pressure, manage competing technical demands and navigate asymmetries of knowledge and power. Although the literature on everyday ethics shows that routine practice is ethically dense, it does not provide a compact reasoning structure designed for use as care unfolds. This article develops such a structure. Method (Conceptual) The framework was developed through conceptual analysis of the temporal and cognitive conditions of decision‐making during clinical action. Five bodies of scholarship informed its design: reflective practice, the logic of care, everyday ethics, cognitive load theory, and naturalistic decision‐making. Three hypothetical clinical cases were used to examine its internal coherence and illustrate how it could be applied. Results CALME is a five‐component cognitive loop: Context, Appraisal, Limits, Margin of manoeuvre and Evaluation. Its compact structure is designed to limit the effort required to search among possible actions, with the aim of preserving working memory for ethical attention. The Limits component makes competence, ethical justification, the patient's wishes and institutional constraints explicit. Margin of manoeuvre narrows the available actions to four categories: continue, adapt, defer or stop. Evaluation then returns the clinician to Context, allowing the loop to be repeated as action changes the situation. Conclusions In a form simple enough to remember and practical enough to use at the bedside, CALME gives explicit structure to ethical decision‐making during clinical encounters. It offers clinicians what the everyday‐ethics literature has not yet provided: not simply another account of the ethical density of routine practice, but a usable format for the reasoning that such density requires.

External reference records

Unresolved referenced work

2019

The Tyranny of Principles

10.2307/3560542 · 1981

A Critique of Principlism

10.1093/jmp/15.2.219 · 1990

Unresolved referenced work

2015

10.1007/s10730-017-9325-4

10.1186/s12910-018-0325-y

Unresolved referenced work

2009

A Surgical Safety Checklist to Reduce Morbidity and Mortality in a Global Population

10.1056/nejmsa0810119 · 2009

Unresolved referenced work

1998

Naturalistic Decision Making

10.1518/001872008x288385 · 2008

10.1215/9780822379782-004

10.1002/hast.413

What Is Everyday Ethics? A Review and a Proposal for an Integrative Concept

10.1086/jce2016272117 · 2016

10.1097/00012272-200701000-00009

10.1186/1747-5341-5-6

10.22454/fammed.2018.821666

Ethics, Reflexivity, and “Ethically Important Moments” in Research

10.1177/1077800403262360 · 2004

10.1097/acm.0000000000000709

10.2522/ptj.20090379

10.1097/phm.0b013e318292309b

10.1177/0969733016646155

Unresolved referenced work

1983

10.4324/9780203927076

10.4324/9780203927076 · 2008

10.1097/00000446-198412000-00027

10.1097/00000446-198412000-00027 · 1984

Schon Shock: A Case for Refraining Reflection‐In‐Action?

10.1080/1354060950010102 · 1995

10.1136/practneurol-2017-001740

10.1007/s11019-016-9749-7

Moral Distress, Moral Residue, and the Crescendo Effect

10.1086/jce200920406 · 2009

10.1177/0969733017724354

Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning

10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4 · 1988

Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design

10.1023/a:1022193728205 · 1998

10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03498.x

10.4103/jehp.jehp_643_19

Unresolved referenced work

2011

10.1007/s10459-009-9182-2

10.1097/acm.0000000000001421

Taking Stock of Naturalistic Decision Making

10.1002/bdm.381 · 2001

Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems

10.1518/001872095779049543 · 1995

Organizing and the Process of Sensemaking

10.1287/orsc.1050.0133 · 2005

10.1093/intqhc/mzv063

Additional external references

Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ): A 32‐Item Checklist for Interviews and Focus Groups

10.1093/intqhc/mzm042 · doi-reference

Recommendations for End‐of‐Life Care in the Intensive Care Unit: A Consensus Statement by the American College of Critical Care Medicine

10.1097/ccm.0b013e3181659096 · doi-reference

10.1007/s11606-010-1292-2

10.1007/s11606-010-1292-2 · doi-reference

10.1093/oso/9780195123333.001.0001

10.1093/oso/9780195123333.001.0001 · doi-reference

10.1016/j.pec.2005.06.010

10.1016/j.pec.2005.06.010 · doi-reference

10.1136/bmj.j4891

10.1136/bmj.j4891 · doi-reference

10.1007/s11606-012-2077-6

10.1007/s11606-012-2077-6 · doi-reference

10.1111/nup.12231

10.1111/nup.12231 · doi-reference

10.1111/medu.15108

10.1111/medu.15108 · doi-reference

10.1093/oseo/instance.00258622

10.1093/oseo/instance.00258622 · doi-reference

10.1080/0142159x.2018.1484898

10.1080/0142159x.2018.1484898 · doi-reference

10.1016/j.cppeds.2015.10.001

CALME: A Cognitive Loop for Ethical Deliberation During Clinical Action

Referenced works

Cited by

External reference records

Additional external references