Abstract
Bersu Bedirhandede, Beyza Güney, Dilan Gizem Doğan, Barış Erkut Türk
Abstract
Authors
Institutions
No ROR-resolved institution is linked to this work yet.
Provenance
crossref
Confidence 100%
pubmed
Confidence 98%
europepmc
Confidence 96%
unpaywall
Confidence 95%
datacite
Confidence 0%
No local reference links have been materialized yet.
No local citing links have been materialized yet.
Occlusion and biomechanical risk factors in implant‐supported full‐arch fixed dental prostheses: a narrative review
10.3390/jpm15020065 · 2025
Biomechanical evaluation of conventional, zygomatic, zygomatic bone‐anchored subperiosteal and maxilla‐anchored subperiosteal implants in the totally edentulous maxilla: a finite element stress analysis
10.1186/s12903-025-06387-3 · 2025
Number and localization of implants for fixed prosthetic reconstructions: strain in the anterior maxillary region
10.1016/j.medengphy.2015.02.004 · 2015
Finite element analysis of the biomechanical effects of titanium and CFR‐PEEK additively manufactured subperiosteal jaw implants on the maxilla
10.1016/j.jormas.2022.09.011 · 2022
Custom‐made subperiosteal implants: a finite element analysis of monoblock and dual implant systems in the atrophic maxilla
10.7150/ijms.89411 · 2023
PEEK with reinforced materials and modifications for dental implant applications
10.3390/dj5040035 · 2017
Finite element analysis of the biomechanical effects of PEEK dental implants on peri‐implant bone
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.11.017 · 2015
Evaluation of stress distribution in CFR‐PEEK dental implants by three‐dimensional finite element analysis
10.1007/s10856-010-4084-7 · 2010
Stress shielding and fatigue limits of polyetheretherketone dental implants
2012
Finite element analysis of carbon fiber‐reinforced polyetheretherketone dental implants in implant‐supported fixed dentures
10.1016/j.jormas.2024.101902 · 2024
Biomechanical effects of digitally constructed titanium, modified polyetheretherketone, and polyetherketoneketone subperiosteal implants on the atrophied maxilla: a finite element analysis
10.1186/s12903-025-06426-z · 2025
Biomechanical evaluation of prosthetic framework materials in subperiosteal implants: a finite element analysis
10.1186/s12903-025-07391-3 · 2025
Accuracy of three intraoral scanners in recording impressions for full‐arch implant‐supported prostheses: an in vitro study
10.12659/msm.946624 · 2024
Assessment of buccal bone thickness of the aesthetic maxillary region: a cone‐beam computed tomography study
10.5051/jpis.2015.45.5.162 · 2015
Evaluation of alveolar bone dimensions and root positioning of anterior teeth in the maxilla
10.11607/prd.5512 · 2023
CBCT assessment of bone thickness in maxillary and mandibular teeth: an anatomic study
10.1590/1678-7757-2019-0148 · 2020
Evaluation of stresses on mandible bone and prosthetic parts in fixed prostheses using CFR‐PEEK, PEKK, and PEEK frameworks
10.1038/s41598-023-38288-2 · 2023
Improvement of an additively manufactured subperiosteal implant structure design by finite elements based topological optimization
10.1038/s41598-021-94980-1 · 2021
A preliminary report of maximum voluntary bite force in a young Indian population
10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1021_23 · 2024
Measurement of maximum bite force in natural dentition using a gnathodynamometer
10.18044/medinform.201412.70 · 2014
Influence of different clinical scenarios on the biomechanical behavior of a maxillary central incisor: a finite element analysis study
10.1186/s12903-025-06157-1 · 2025
Influence of occlusal forces on teeth with altered periodontal support: a three‐dimensional finite element analysis
10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_785_20 · 2021
Maximum voluntary molar and incisor bite force and morphological variables in different vertical skeletal patterns
10.1177/03015742211044856 · 2022
Influence of off‐axis loading of an anterior maxillary implant: a three‐dimensional finite element analysis
2007
Evaluation of stress on bone‐level and tissue‐level short implants: a finite element analysis study
10.1016/j.jormas.2022.09.019 · 2023
Effect of implant distribution on functional and patient‐reported outcomes of mandibular overdentures retained by four mini implants
10.1111/joor.14024 · 2025
Influence of functional forces on the biomechanics of implant‐supported prostheses: a review
10.1016/s0300-5712(02)00065-9 · 2002
Finite element analysis of the effect of anterior cantilever in implant‐supported overdentures
1998
Prosthetic considerations in implant‐supported prostheses: a review
2017
Effect of implant scan body type, intraoral scanner, and scan strategy on the accuracy and scanning time of complete‐arch implant scans: an in vitro study
10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105782 · 2025
Comparison of screws with different diameters in subperiosteal implant applications using finite element analysis
10.7150/ijms.93225 · 2024
Evaluation of clinical success of 3D‐printed custom‐made subperiosteal implants
10.1097/scs.0000000000010148 · 2024
Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: a review
10.1067/mpr.2001.115251 · 2001
Shock absorption capacity of restorative materials for implant prostheses: an in vitro study
10.11607/ijp.3241 · 2013
CF‐PEEK vs titanium dental implants: stress distribution and fatigue performance in variable bone qualities
10.3390/biomimetics10090619 · 2025
The anterior cantilever in the implant‐supported screw‐retained mandibular prosthesis
10.1067/mpr.2003.43 · 2003
Occlusal considerations in implant therapy: clinical guidelines with biomechanical rationale
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01067.x · 2005
No additional external references are available.