Abstract
ABSTRACT
Suicide‐focused nursing often depends on the language of risk, crisis, symptoms, and safety. These languages are necessary, yet they do not fully explain how a life can become narratively organized around only one plausible ending. This conceptual paper develops narrative foreclosure as a structural account of suicidal meaning and uses genre as a heuristic for examining the architecture of expectation within a person's story‐world. Drawing from narrative identity, autobiographical memory, self‐continuity, suicidology, relational theories of selfhood, and genre theory, the paper distinguishes four illustrative foreclosure logics: tragic finality, horrific inescapability, exhausted futility, and exilic non‐belonging. The argument is not that people experiencing suicidality belong to genres. Rather, genre helps describe how self‐position, relational meaning, temporality, affect, and anticipated endings can become mutually reinforcing and increasingly closed. The paper then develops narrative possibility as the counter‐concept: structural openness that permits more than one self‐position, relational interpretation, and future without requiring optimism or denying pain. For nursing inquiry, the contribution is disciplinary rather than procedural. It asks how nurses can recognize narrative closure while preserving interpretive humility, cultural responsiveness, safety, and the person's authority over meaning.