Abstract
ABSTRACT
Nursing ethics has long taken the bedside encounter as the moral center of practice. Yet this focus becomes incomplete when the material conditions of care are treated as ethically external to nursing itself. Ordinary clinical supplies such as gloves, masks, gowns, syringes, drapes, and linens are commonly understood as neutral instruments of safe and competent care. This paper argues that such neutrality is philosophically misleading. The materials through which nursing is enacted are embedded in global systems of labor, extraction, manufacture, circulation, use, and disposal that may involve exploitation, ecological degradation, and unequal distributions of risk. Using gloves and personal protective equipment as an entry point, this paper asks:
To what extent are nurses ethically responsible for challenging the use of clinical supplies produced through labor exploitation or environmental injustice?
Drawing on feminist political economy, care ethics, and materiality‐oriented perspectives, I argue that care is not only an interpersonal act but also a relational, material, and politically organized practice. From this standpoint, procurement is part of nursing's moral field rather than a merely managerial concern. The paper advances a bounded account of professional responsibility grounded in epistemic attentiveness, discursive engagement, advocacy, and collective political action. A nursing philosophy of procurement justice enlarges, rather than dilutes, the meaning of care, responsibility, and advocacy. If nursing remains committed to dignity, justice, and the reduction of harm, it cannot regard the workers and communities who materially sustain care as ethically invisible. Nursing ethics must therefore extend beyond the bedside into the hidden infrastructures through which care becomes possible.