Abstract
ABSTRACT
Discrimination in healthcare is conventionally framed as a matter of patient experience or individual clinician bias. What is notably absent from the theoretical and empirical landscape of nursing is a systematic engagement with nurses' own witnessing of discrimination—not as neutral observers, but as professionals embedded within organisational structures that impose, encourage, or normalise discriminatory practices. This article argues that this absence is not a mere oversight but an epistemological pattern: nursing knowledge has historically privileged individualistic, depoliticised, and clinically neutral frameworks, thereby indirectly marginalising and rendering structural inequality less visible. Situating this argument within the ongoing critical conversation on epistemic silence and silencing in nursing, the paper articulates how the erasure of nurses' own perceptions of discrimination contributes to the reproduction of systemic inequity. Drawing on critical nursing epistemology, this paper constructs a critical dialogue among three theoretical traditions—Bourdieu's social capital, organisational justice theory, and Foucauldian–Habermasian critical thought—to demonstrate how the production of professional knowledge itself may be complicit in sustaining discrimination. Rather than offering a prescriptive model, the Nursing Justice Reflexivity Framework (NJRF) is introduced as a conceptual intervention aimed at challenging disciplinary silences and redirecting nursing research and practice toward structural reflexivity, power literacy, and justice‐oriented praxis. This paper contributes to global debates on health equity by reframing nurses' perceived discrimination not merely as a clinical or ethical issue, but as an epistemological crisis with deep roots in the politics of nursing knowledge.