Abstract
Taking treatments from bench to bedside, or bench to community, requires a viable pathway connecting molecular science to global need through public and private research funding, clinical development, drug marketing, and policy making. In this paper, the authors present a systematic analysis of the effectiveness of translating basic science into reduced global burden of disease as a proxy for systemic public health impact. They pose a compound research question: Is the current drug development pipeline aligned with current and future global burden of disease, and, if not, where do the disconnections occur?