Abstract
Background
These data compare the efficacy and safety of highly purified human-derived follicle-stimulating hormone (Bravelle) and recombinant follitropin-beta (Follistim) in women undergoing in vitro fertilization.Methods
This report describes the pooled data from two, nearly identical, randomized, controlled, parallel-group, multicenter studies conducted in a total of 19 academic and private IVF-ET centers in the United States. Infertile premenopausal women underwent pituitary down-regulation using leuprolide acetate followed by a maximum of 12 days of subcutaneous Bravelle (n = 120) or Follistim (n = 118), followed by administration of human chorionic gonadotropin, oocyte retrieval and embryo transfer. The primary efficacy measure was the mean number of oocytes retrieved; secondary efficacy measures included the total dose and duration of gonadotropin treatment; peak serum estradion levels; embryo transfer and implantation rates; chemical, clinical and continuing pregnancies; and live birth rates. All adverse events were recorded and injection site pain was recorded daily using a patient, self-assessment diary.Results
Similar efficacy responses were observed for all outcome parameters in the two treatment groups. Although patients receiving Bravelle consistently reported a greater number of chemical, clinical and continuing pregnancies, as well as an increased rate of live birth, the data did not attain statistical significance (P > 0.05). The overall incidence of adverse events was similar in both groups, but compared to Follistim, injections of Bravelle were reported by patients to be significantly less painful (P Conclusions
Bravelle and Follistim had comparable efficacy in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in women undergoing IVF-ET. There were no differences in the nature or number of adverse events between the treatment groups although Bravelle injections were reported to be significantly less painful.