Abstract
Curated scientific databases catalogue and amplify research findings to maximize their reach. Authors should write their papers with this in mind, ensuring that data are accurate, easy to extract, and presented in standardized formats.
Alexander Holmes, Denise Carvalho-Silva, Zbyslaw Sondka, Madiha Ahmed, Joanna Argasinska, Rachel Lyne, Amaia Sangrador-Vegas, Sari Ward
Abstract
Authors
Institutions
No ROR-resolved institution is linked to this work yet.
Provenance
No local reference links have been materialized yet.
No local citing links have been materialized yet.
The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship.
10.1038/sdata.2016.18 · 2016
Toward interoperable bioscience data
10.1038/ng.1054 · 2012
impact report: The value of EMBL-EBI data resources
2021
Quality Matters: Biocuration Experts on the Impact of Duplication and Other Data Quality Issues in Biological Databases
10.1016/j.gpb.2018.11.006 · 2020
Expert curation in UniProtKB: a case study on dealing with conflicting and erroneous data.
2014
Big data: The future of biocuration
10.1038/455047a · 2008
The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy.
2009
Unresolved referenced work
2011
Disappearing repositories—taking an infrastructure perspective on the long-term availability of research data.
2023
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
The Minimal Dataset for Cancer of the 1+Million Genomes Initiative.
crossref
Confidence 100%
pubmed
Confidence 98%
europepmc
Confidence 96%
unpaywall
Confidence 95%
doaj
Confidence 92%
datacite
Confidence 0%
2023
The Alliance of Genome Resources: Building a Modern Data Ecosystem for Model Organism Databases
10.1534/genetics.119.302523 · 2019
Data sharing practices and data availability upon request differ across scientific disciplines.
10.1038/s41597-021-00981-0 · 2021
Many researchers were not compliant with their published data sharing statement: a mixed-methods study.
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.05.019 · 2022
No additional external references are available.