Abstract
Contact and support
Need help, have a question, or want to contact the ResearchHub team?
© 2026 ResearchHub. Built for responsible scholarly connection.
Yasmeen Razvi, Simonne L. Horwitz, Celine Cressman, Daniel E. Wang, Randi Zlotnik Shaul, Avram Denburg
Abstract
Authors
Institutions
No ROR-resolved institution is linked to this work yet.
Provenance
crossref
Confidence 100%
pubmed
Confidence 98%
europepmc
Confidence 96%
unpaywall
Confidence 95%
doaj
Confidence 92%
datacite
Confidence 0%
No local reference links have been materialized yet.
No local citing links have been materialized yet.
Public drug policy for children in Canada.
10.1503/cmaj.170380 · 2017
Which criteria are considered in healthcare decisions? Insights from an international survey of policy and clinical decision makers
10.1017/s0266462313000573 · 2013
Scientific and social value judgments for orphan drugs in health technology assessment.
10.1017/s0266462316000416 · 2016
Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) for evaluating new medicines in Health Technology Assessment and beyond: The Advance Value Framework.
10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.06.024 · 2017
Using health technology assessment to assess the value of new medicines: results of a systematic review and expert consultation across eight European countries.
10.1007/s10198-017-0871-0 · 2018
An evidence framework for off-patent pharmaceutical review for Health Technology Assessment in emerging markets.
10.1016/j.vhri.2018.01.003 · 2018
Application of a value framework based on Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis in the context of health technology assessment: A series of case studies with decision makers across European countries.
10.1016/j.jval.2016.09.080 · 2016
Recommendations from the European working group for value assessment and funding processes in rare diseases (ORPH-VAL).
10.1186/s13023-017-0601-9 · 2017
What is driving HTA decision-making? Evidence from cancer drug reimbursement decisions from 6 European countries.
10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.11.003 · 2019
Accountable and Reasonable processes for coverage decision-making for rare disease and regenerative therapies–Which criteria should be considered and why?
10.1016/j.jval.2018.04.437 · 2018
Ethics and economics: does programme budgeting and marginal analysis contribute to fair priority setting?
10.1258/135581906775094280 · 2006
Prioritisation of specialist health care services; not NICE, not easy but it can be done.
10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.06.007 · 2017
6-STEPPPs: A modular tool to facilitate clinician participation in fair decisions for funding new cancer drugs
10.1200/jop.0812001 · 2008
“The problem is small enough, the problem is big enough”: A qualitative study of health technology assessment and public policy on drug funding decisions for children.
10.1186/s12939-020-01164-w · 2020
PIH83 Health Technology Assessment in Child Health
10.1016/j.jval.2012.03.1115 · 2012
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Canadian trends and projections in prescription drug purchases: 2001–2023
2021
Management of hospital formularies in Ontario: Challenges within a Local Health Integration Network
2016
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis.
10.1080/2159676x.2019.1628806 · 2019
Thematic analysis.
2019
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis for HTA across four EU Member States: Piloting the Advance Value Framework.
2020
Variation in Health Technology Assessment and Reimbursement Processes in Europe.
10.1016/j.jval.2016.08.725 · 2017
Addressing the affordability of cancer drugs: Using deliberative public engagement to inform health policy
10.1186/s12961-019-0411-8 · 2019
Implementing reflective multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) to assess orphan drugs value in the Catalan Health Service (CatSalut).
10.1186/s13023-019-1121-6 · 2019
Action Guide for Addressing Ethical Challenges of Resource Allocation within Community-Based Healthcare Organizations.
10.1086/jce2018292124 · 2018
NICE and Fair? Health Technology Assessment Policy Under the UK’s National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, 1999–2018
10.1007/s10728-019-00381-x · 2020
Oncology drugs for orphan indications: how are HTA processes evolving for this specific drug category?
10.2147/ceor.s134230 · 2017
Stakeholder views on criteria and processes for priority setting in Norway: a qualitative study.
10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.04.005 · 2017
Review: Rare diseases under different levels of economic analysis: current activities, challenges and perspectives.
10.1136/rmdopen-2018-000794 · 2018
Community views on factors affecting medicines resource allocation: cross-sectional survey of 3080 adults in Australia.
10.1071/ah16209 · 2019
Development of the WHO-INTEGRATE evidence-to-decision framework: An overview of systematic reviews of decision criteria for health decision-making
10.1186/s12962-020-0203-6 · 2020
Priority setting in hospitals: fairness, inclusiveness, and the problem of institutional power differences.
10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.04.037 · 2005
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195149364.001.0001
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195149364.001.0001 · 2002
Patient empowerment and access to medicines: Insights from a scientist-patient suffering from erythropoietic protoporphyria
2019
Governments need better guidance to maximise value for money: The case of Australia’s pharmaceutical benefits advisory committee.
10.1007/s40258-015-0220-3 · 2016
Generating Health Technology Assessment evidence for rare diseases.
10.1017/s0266462314000464 · doi-reference