Abstract
Oliver Vij, Henry Calver, Nikki Myall, Mrinalini Dey, Koushan Kouranloo
Abstract
Authors
Institutions
No ROR-resolved institution is linked to this work yet.
Provenance
crossref
Confidence 100%
pubmed
Confidence 98%
europepmc
Confidence 96%
unpaywall
Confidence 95%
doaj
Confidence 92%
datacite
Confidence 0%
No local reference links have been materialized yet.
No local citing links have been materialized yet.
Performance of ChatGPT on USMLE: Potential for AI-assisted medical education using large language models
10.1371/journal.pdig.0000198 · 2023
Artificial intelligence in medical imaging
10.1016/j.mri.2019.12.006 · 2020
How to develop machine learning models for healthcare
10.1038/s41563-019-0345-0 · 2019
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
The rise of ChatGPT: Exploring its potential in medical education
2023
Enhancing clinical reasoning with Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer: a practical guide
2023
Using ChatGPT in Medical Research: Current Status and Future Directions
10.2147/jmdh.s413470 · 2023
ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education?
2023
Parralel Recurrent Convolutional Neural Network for Abnormal Heart Sound Classification
2023
Application of Recurrent Neural Network Algorithm in Intelligent Detection of Clinical Ultrasound Images of Human Lungs
2022
Long short-term memory artificial neural network model for prediction of prostate cancer survival outcomes according to initial treatment strategy: development of an online decision-making support system
10.1007/s00345-020-03080-8 · 2020
Monitoring ICU Mortality Risk with A Long Short-Term Memory Recurrent Neural Network
2020
Attention Is All You Need
2023
Large language models in medicine
10.1038/s41591-023-02448-8 · 2023
AI bot ChatGPT writes smart essays — should professors worry?
2022
ChatGPT: the future of discharge summaries?
10.1016/s2589-7500(23)00021-3 · 2023
A Cross Sectional Study of ChatGPT in Translation: Magnitude of Use, Attitudes, and Uncertainties
10.1007/s10936-023-10031-y · 2023
Empowering beginners in bioinformatics with ChatGPT
10.15302/j-qb-023-0327 · 2023
This too shall pass: the performance of ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4 and New Bing in an Australian medical licensing examination
10.5694/mja2.52061 · 2023
How does ChatGPT-4 preform on non-English national medical licensing examination? An evaluation in Chinese language
10.1371/journal.pdig.0000397 · 2023
ChatGPT in Iranian medical licensing examination: evaluating the diagnostic accuracy and decision-making capabilities of an AI-based model
10.1136/bmjhci-2023-100815 · 2023
Performance of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 on the Japanese Medical Licensing Examination: Comparison Study
10.2196/48002 · 2023
GPT-4 can pass the Korean National Licensing Examination for Korean Medicine Doctors
10.1371/journal.pdig.0000416 · 2023
Performance of ChatGPT, Bard, Claude, and Bing on the Peruvian National Licensing Medical Examination: a cross-sectional study
10.3352/jeehp.2023.20.30 · 2023
ChatGPT Conquers the Saudi Medical Licensing Exam: Exploring the Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Knowledge Assessment and Implications for Modern Medical Education
Kept as external metadata until matched
Evaluating the performance of ChatGPT-4 on the United Kingdom Medical Licensing Assessment
10.3389/fmed.2023.1240915 · 2023
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
ChatGPT-4: An assessment of an upgraded artificial intelligence chatbot in the United States Medical Licensing Examination
2023
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Reliability of the MRCP(UK) Part I Examination, 1984–2001
10.1046/j.1365-2923.2003.01568.x · 2003
Graduates of different UK medical schools show substantial differences in performance on MRCP(UK) Part 1, Part 2 and PACES examinations
10.1186/1741-7015-6-5 · 2008
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews
10.1136/bmj.n160 · 2021
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
ChatGPT’s Response Consistency: A Study on Repeated Queries of Medical Examination Questions
2024
Capabilities of GPT-4 on Medical Challenge Problems
2023
Could ChatGPT Pass the UK Radiology Fellowship Examinations?
2023
Performance of ChatGPT on a primary FRCA multiple choice question bank
10.1016/j.bja.2023.04.025 · 2023
Performance of ChatGPT and Bard on the official part 1 FRCOphth practice questions
2023
ChatGPT outscored human candidates in a virtual objective structured clinical examination in obstetrics and gynecology
2023
Diagnostic reasoning prompts reveal the potential for large language model interpretability in medicine
10.1038/s41746-024-01010-1 · doi-reference
ChatGPT Utility in Healthcare Education, Research, and Practice: Systematic Review on the Promising Perspectives and Valid Concerns
10.3390/healthcare11060887 · doi-reference
Fabrication and errors in the bibliographic citations generated by ChatGPT
10.1038/s41598-023-41032-5 · doi-reference
ChatGPT: these are not hallucinations – they’re fabrications and falsifications
10.1038/s41537-023-00379-4 · doi-reference
GPT-4 in Nuclear Medicine Education: Does It Outperform GPT-3.5?
10.2967/jnmt.123.266485 · doi-reference
ChatGPT in medicine: an overview of its applications, advantages, limitations, future prospects, and ethical considerations
10.3389/frai.2023.1169595 · doi-reference
PLAB and UK graduates’ performance on MRCP(UK) and MRCGP examinations: data linkage study
10.1136/bmj.g2621 · doi-reference
Evaluation of Large language model performance on the Multi-Specialty Recruitment Assessment (MSRA) exam
10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107794 · doi-reference
Evaluating the limits of AI in medical specialisation: ChatGPT’s performance on the UK Neurology Specialty Certificate Examination
10.1136/bmjno-2023-000451 · doi-reference
Artificial intelligence and anaesthesia examinations: exploring ChatGPT as a prelude to the future
10.1016/j.bja.2023.04.033 · doi-reference
Comparative analysis of large language models in the Royal College of Ophthalmologists fellowship exams
10.1038/s41433-023-02563-3 · doi-reference
Assessing ChatGPT’s ability to pass the FRCS orthopaedic part A exam: A critical analysis
10.1016/j.surge.2023.07.001 · doi-reference