Abstract
Olga Rook, Hub Zwart, Marileen Dogterom
Abstract
Authors
Institutions
No ROR-resolved institution is linked to this work yet.
Provenance
crossref
Confidence 100%
pubmed
Confidence 98%
europepmc
Confidence 96%
unpaywall
Confidence 95%
doaj
Confidence 92%
datacite
Confidence 0%
No local reference links have been materialized yet.
No local citing links have been materialized yet.
10.1007/978-1-62703-625-2
10.1007/978-1-62703-625-2 · 2013
Synthetic biology
10.1038/nrg1637 · 2005
Piecing together a puzzle: an exposition of synthetic biology
10.1038/embor.2009.76 · 2009
Principles of synthetic biology
10.1042/ebc20200059 · 2021
Engineering life through synthetic biology
10.3233/isb-00253 · 2006
Present and future of synthetic cell development
10.1038/s41580-023-00686-9 · 2004
10.1007/978-981-19-7911-8_2
10.1007/978-981-19-7911-8_2 · 2023
Whole genome engineering by synthesis
10.1007/s11427-018-9403-y · 2018
Creation of a bacterial cell controlled by a chemically synthesized genome
10.1126/science.1190719 · 2010
Mastering complexity: towards bottom-up construction of multifunctional eukaryotic synthetic cells
10.1016/j.tibtech.2018.03.008 · 2018
How simple could life be?
10.1002/anie.201700665 · 2017
Social and ethical issues concerning protocells.
10.7551/mitpress/7590.003.0035 · 2008
Social and ethical checkpoints for bottom-up synthetic biology, or protocells
10.1007/s11693-009-9039-2 · 2009
Fake cells and the aura of life: a philosophical diagnostic of synthetic life
10.1016/j.endeavour.2022.100845 · 2022
Synthetic cells in biomedical applications
10.1002/wnan.1761 · 2022
Light-powered CO2 fixation in a chloroplast mimic with natural and synthetic parts
10.1126/science.aaz6802 · 2020
Can bottom-up synthetic biology generate advanced drug-delivery systems?
10.1016/j.tibtech.2020.08.002 · 2021
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Unresolved referenced work
2022
Why the synthetic cell needs democratic governance
10.1016/j.tibtech.2020.11.006 · 2021
Synthetic biology applied in the agrifood sector: public perceptions, attitudes and implications for future studies
10.1016/j.tifs.2019.07.025 · 2019
Unresolved referenced work
2012
Public understanding of synthetic biology
10.1525/bio.2013.63.2.4 · 2013
Unresolved referenced work
2013
The synthetic biology puzzle: a qualitative study on public reflections towards a governance framework
10.1007/s11693-015-9182-x · 2015
Image of synthetic biology and nanotechnology: a survey among university students
10.3389/fgene.2017.00122 · 2017
Unresolved referenced work
2017
Perception of synthetic biology application for biodiversity conservation among life science students in Institut Teknologi Bandung, Indonesia
10.13057/nusbiosci/n100105 · 2018
Framing synthetic biology: evolutionary distance, conceptions of nature, and the unnaturalness objection
10.1177/1075547012470707 · 2013
Review of quantitative and qualitative studies on US public perceptions of synthetic biology
10.1007/s11693-009-9035-6 · 2009
Playing God and tampering with nature: popular labels for real concerns in synthetic biology
10.1007/s11248-021-00233-2 · 2021
Public perceptions of synthetic biology solutions for environmental problems
10.3389/fenvs.2022.928732 · 2022
Chinese public perceptions of food applications based on synthetic biology
10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.104950 · 2023
Synthetic cells synthesize therapeutic proteins inside tumors
10.1002/adhm.201701163 · 2018
Muconic acid production using engineered Pseudomonas putida KT2440 and a guaiacol-rich fraction derived from kraft lignin
10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c00933 · 2021
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Unresolved referenced work
2020
Unresolved referenced work
Kept as external metadata until matched
Unresolved referenced work
2005
Evaluating human behaviour in response to AI recommendations for judgemental forecasting
10.1016/j.ejor.2022.03.017 · 2022
Implicit consumer preferences and their influence on product choice
10.1002/mar.20126 · doi-reference
When and why do implicit measures predict behaviour? Empirical evidence for the moderating role of opportunity, motivation, and process reliance
10.1080/10463280802556958 · doi-reference
Scientific progress, normative discussions, and the pragmatic account of definitions of life
10.1007/s11229-023-04085-7 · doi-reference
On the “Life-Likeness” of synthetic cells
10.3389/fbioe.2020.00953 · doi-reference
Cell mimicry: bottom-up engineering of life
10.1098/rsfs.2023.0034 · doi-reference
What it means to be alive: a synthetic cell perspective
10.1098/rsfs.2023.0036 · doi-reference
Generating minimal living systems from non-living materials and increasing their evolutionary abilities
10.1098/rstb.2015.0440 · doi-reference
European and American perspectives on the meaning of natural
10.1016/j.appet.2012.06.001 · doi-reference
Actually, natural is neutral
10.1038/s41562-020-0891-0 · doi-reference
Making life: a comment on ‘Playing God in Frankenstein’s footsteps: synthetic biology and the meaning of life’by Henk van den Belt (2009)
10.1007/s11569-010-0091-x · doi-reference
A shift towards biotechnology: social opinion in the EU
10.1016/j.tibtech.2020.08.001 · doi-reference
Controversial medical and agri-food biotechnology: a cultivationanalysis
10.1088/0963-6625/11/2/301 · doi-reference
Public views on gene editing and its uses
10.1038/nbt.3958 · doi-reference
Playing god? Synthetic biology as a theological and ethical challenge
10.1007/s11693-009-9028-5 · doi-reference
Nano-ethics as NEST-ethics: patterns of moral argumentation about new and emerging science and technology
10.1007/s11569-007-0005-8 · doi-reference
The commodification of emergence: systems biology, synthetic biology and intellectual property
10.1017/s1745855208006303 · doi-reference
Synthetic biology ethics: a deontological assessment
10.1111/bioe.12052 · doi-reference
Playing god and the intrinsic value of life: moral problems for synthetic biology?
10.1007/s11948-012-9353-z · doi-reference
Playing god in Frankenstein’s footsteps: synthetic biology and the meaning of life
10.1007/s11569-009-0079-6 · doi-reference
Playing god or just unnatural? Religious beliefs and approval of synthetic biology
10.1177/0963662512445011 · doi-reference
Who is skeptical about scientific innovation? Examining worldview predictors of artificial intelligence, nanotechnology, and human gene editing attitudes
10.1177/10755470231184203 · doi-reference
Dynamics of problem setting and framing in citizen discussions on synthetic biology
10.1177/0963662517712207 · doi-reference
(Re‐) designing nature? An overview and outlook on the ethical and societal challenges in synthetic biology
10.1002/adbi.201800326 · doi-reference
10.1007/978-3-319-21088-9_2
10.1007/978-3-319-21088-9_2 · doi-reference
Synthetic biology: recent progress, biosafety and biosecurity concerns, and possible solutions
10.1016/j.jobb.2018.12.003 · doi-reference
10.1007/978-94-024-2086-9
10.1007/978-94-024-2086-9 · doi-reference
Using topic modeling methods for short-text data: a comparative analysis
10.3389/frai.2020.00042 · doi-reference
Performance analysis of the CHAID algorithm for accuracy
10.3390/math11112558 · doi-reference
The forest or the trees? Tackling Simpson’s paradox with classification trees
10.1111/poms.12819 · doi-reference
Big data: New tricks for econometrics
10.1257/jep.28.2.3 · doi-reference